Search

Notices

LEC Election Pandering

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2013 | 04:32 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
Biased in what way? How do you pick out 7,000+ pilots that are spread from top to bottom of the Seniority List, flying under the same contract, and treat them with bias?

More conspiracy theory...
Easily!! You find traits that are common to that group and exploit them. For instance, the LUAL group has more Longevity. Policy's could be changed (jumpseating) from a Senority based system to a Longevity based system that would overly favor the LUAL group. The LUAL pilots will not be flying the 787 for a couple of years, policy's could be adopted to harm that group. ETC..... We will not be singing kumbaya anytime soon.
Reply
Old 09-17-2013 | 05:33 AM
  #12  
LAX Pilot's Avatar
Peace Love Understanding
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
Easily!! You find traits that are common to that group and exploit them. For instance, the LUAL group has more Longevity. Policy's could be changed (jumpseating) from a Senority based system to a Longevity based system that would overly favor the LUAL group. The LUAL pilots will not be flying the 787 for a couple of years, policy's could be adopted to harm that group. ETC..... We will not be singing kumbaya anytime soon.
The United FOM states that pilot DOH is to be used in jumpseat. We have to change the FOM to how CAL wants it to make that happen.

Its funny you look at being screwed by the other pilot group because that's probably how you think a CAL dominated MEC would treat L-UAL pilots, of course, we already know what L-CAL pilots tried to do with SLI and the last three years, so there really isn't any doubt there.
Reply
Old 09-17-2013 | 06:31 AM
  #13  
UalHvy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
Easily!! You find traits that are common to that group and exploit them. For instance, the LUAL group has more Longevity. Policy's could be changed (jumpseating) from a Senority based system to a Longevity based system that would overly favor the LUAL group. The LUAL pilots will not be flying the 787 for a couple of years, policy's could be adopted to harm that group. ETC..... We will not be singing kumbaya anytime soon.
Just because you and your screwed up MEC think that way doesn't mean that the UAL side does. Get the chip off of your shoulder.
Reply
Old 09-17-2013 | 06:36 AM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Default

They only way I can see it is a vote for Tony is a vote for division. The new Council #5 will have a CAL Captain Rep but it doesn't have to be one that's promoting division before giving the system a chance to work. We've seen what JP did for the past 3 years. If you can't vote for the other guy, don't vote for Tony. Instead, vote for none of the above.
Reply
Old 09-17-2013 | 06:55 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
Default

Originally Posted by UalHvy
Just because you and your screwed up MEC think that way doesn't mean that the UAL side does. Get the chip off of your shoulder.
So far I know of one issue that awaits the combined MEC. It was put forth by LUAL. It is the jumpseat issue, that is definitely tilted to the LUAL side. I know not all think this way but the is a vocal group that has it out for CAL pilots. Be it because they believe we held up the process, are a scab airline, did not earn our dues, stole all the growth, tried to staple 3000 to the bottom, etc.... They defiantly have it out for us.
Reply
Old 09-17-2013 | 06:59 AM
  #16  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
So far I know of one issue that awaits the combined MEC. It was put forth by LUAL. It is the jumpseat issue, that is definitely tilted to the LUAL side. I know not all think this way but the is a vocal group that has it out for CAL pilots. Be it because they believe we held up the process, are a scab airline, did not earn our dues, stole all the growth, tried to staple 3000 to the bottom, etc.... They defiantly have it out for us.
If you hadn't done all that you wouldn't be so paranoid. Try to do the right thing going forward and it'll be alright.
Reply
Old 09-17-2013 | 07:07 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
Default

Originally Posted by JohnHale
If you hadn't done all that you wouldn't be so paranoid. Try to do the right thing going forward and it'll be alright.
Lol, I did not do any of it, and do not agree that the CAL MEC is responsible or at fault for all of it. Regardless, different view points will remain for quite sometime and a CAL perspective is something that cal pilots would be wise in pursuing.
Reply
Old 09-17-2013 | 07:34 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: 737 fo
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
The United FOM states that pilot DOH is to be used in jumpseat. We have to change the FOM to how CAL wants it to make that happen.
What happens when two guys from the same class hired the same day, show up at the same time for the jumpseat at LUAL? Is it not the SENIOR of the two that gets the seat? It is a Senority based system at LUAL, it just so happens that Senority and DOH have been the same.
Reply
Old 09-17-2013 | 08:06 AM
  #19  
Toddnel's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: EWR 777 FO
Default

Originally Posted by LAX Pilot
The United FOM states that pilot DOH is to be used in jumpseat. We have to change the FOM to how CAL wants it to make that happen.
Please show me where it says that in your FOM. I downloaded the FOM and is specifically states the following:


10.20.3
Flight Deck Access
Jumpseat Authorization

MULTIPLE JUMPSEATERS
When there are multiple jumpseaters, the following guidelines are used to determine
the preferential priority (in order):
• Highest boarding priority in the Jumpseat Priority Table
Use relative seniority for United Employees
• Use time of check in for Non United Employees
Reply
Old 09-17-2013 | 08:09 AM
  #20  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves
Lol, I did not do any of it, and do not agree that the CAL MEC is responsible or at fault for all of it. Regardless, different view points will remain for quite sometime and a CAL perspective is something that cal pilots would be wise in pursuing.
Part of the healing process is taking responsibility for your actions and the actions of those that represented you. Whether you condoned their actions or stood by hoping to benefit from their misguided deeds, you are responsible. Having said that, the UAL pilot group has been known as the Boy Scouts of the airline industry.(as characterized by the PanAm guy that got the first recorded MIG kill in Vietnam). You can go back to the Capital Merger and come forward to the CAL merger and tell/show me where the UAL pilots have dumped on ANY pilot group. Without question, the only group you'll find is the collective SCABS and that will not change.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jetrecruiter
Regional
32
10-03-2009 06:47 AM
Micro
Cargo
0
11-20-2008 05:29 AM
CAL EWR
Union Talk
1
11-10-2008 02:26 PM
Micro
Cargo
3
10-03-2007 11:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices