Search

Notices

Union Dues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2020 | 07:23 PM
  #531  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Default

750-1000.....Classic Angle Lake fear-mongering.Likely to help boost stock prices they fully intend to furlough what ever number Wall St thinks is appropriate. Put the leave numbers unrealistically high and when we come up short they furlough 3-400.....Broken effin record from the Anglers.....In the end they look like heroes....We busted our humps last time to save the day and got kicked in the face....
Reply
Old 06-25-2020 | 07:56 PM
  #532  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 449
Likes: 39
From: Precarious
Default

Originally Posted by AK22
I’m an advocate of incentive lines, and I will bid the longest duration possible. But, these numbers don’t make sense. How does a 20% reduction in block hours next summer equal 750-1000?
They were predicting a really dismal fall and winter though, so if a bunch took the 6 to 9 month options they would still be in better shape this fall and still staffed for next summer.
Reply
Old 06-25-2020 | 08:23 PM
  #533  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 131
Likes: 9
Default

If I’m not mistaken we have around 940 on some kind of leave this month, so again I can’t see 750-1000 being a realistic number for anything longer than 6 months (although we are also lightening schedules with RBB). But, reserve utilization is rather heavy right now.

I’m not sure I buy the wall st fear-mongering either. Maybe, they’re just trying to paint a glum picture so more take it.

With all that said the best outcome would be max participation, keep people off the street. One thing we haven’t heard is, what is the plan if we don’t get enough. Reduced guarantee? I think that prospect might tip the scales for some folks. If guarantee is reduced to 65 hours a senior captain who stays could be working a full schedule for an additional 3.4 hours of pay per month. Incentive line guarantee 50 hours + (40 days vacation @ 3.5 credit/12 months)=61.6 Hours. Why wouldn’t you take this deal?
Reply
Old 06-25-2020 | 09:41 PM
  #534  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 683
Likes: 16
Default

Originally Posted by flysnoopy76
The chief pilot said today on a base call in LA they need 750-1000 to take the early outs or incentive lines, if that’s true it’s seems his furlough number prediction may have been on the low side anyhow.
Someone else can do the real math but just for illustrative purposes... doesn't paying 1000 people 50hrs/month over a given time period very roughly equate to paying 666.66 (repeating of course) people the full 75? Hence ~333 people saved from furlough?
Reply
Old 06-25-2020 | 10:56 PM
  #535  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Default

Forecasting how much of Sec 23 gets used is just a guess. EIL, REIL and VELOA bidding will be closed and awarded long before the furlough mitigation in Sec 23 would be activated. They have no plans to open up EIL bidding again if they miss the “magic number”. You bid it and take it.
Reply
Old 06-26-2020 | 03:14 PM
  #536  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 131
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by 9mikemike
Forecasting how much of Sec 23 gets used is just a guess. EIL, REIL and VELOA bidding will be closed and awarded long before the furlough mitigation in Sec 23 would be activated. They have no plans to open up EIL bidding again if they miss the “magic number”. You bid it and take it.
I agree, but it would be a false assumption to believe if you don’t take an EIL or REIL that you are guaranteed to continue getting 75 hours.
Reply
Old 06-27-2020 | 09:03 AM
  #537  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
Hot off the press... LAX A320 closes January 2021
Looks like he was right again
Reply
Old 06-27-2020 | 09:54 AM
  #538  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 936
Likes: 1
Default

The broken clock in my garage was right 2X today


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 06-27-2020 | 10:39 AM
  #539  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,348
Likes: 331
Default

Originally Posted by pipewrench
Looks like he was right again
So will SFO 320 since SEA is the only 320 base.


The only question that remains is if Boeing becomes a SFO base. With the schedule cutbacks and ERJ170s doing more and more flying in CA, I’m not hopeful. The real problem it’s gonna create is where senior VX guys go. Their seniority takes a huge hit in PDX/SEA because they don’t show up in the top 400. If you close 2 Bus bases back to back, there can only be so many openings in LAX to absorb them. I can definitely see massive displacements in LAX Boeing if they do not open up a SFO Boeing base.
Reply
Old 06-27-2020 | 10:44 AM
  #540  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
So will SFO 320 since SEA is the only 320 base.


The only question that remains is if Boeing becomes a SFO base. With the schedule cutbacks and ERJ170s doing more and more flying in CA, I’m not hopeful. The real problem it’s gonna create is where senior VX guys go. Their seniority takes a huge hit in PDX/SEA because they don’t show up in the top 400. If you close 2 Bus bases back to back, there can only be so many openings in LAX to absorb them. I can definitely see massive displacements in LAX Boeing if they do not open up a SFO Boeing base.
For a commuter unfriendly company, this is very unfortunate. I can see SFO turning into SAN
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
beech1980
Part 135
1191
06-19-2022 05:02 PM
Want2BAtlasAv8r
Hiring News
121
06-15-2018 07:26 PM
astroglydenn
Flexjet
6
05-16-2018 03:49 AM
Fegelein
Cargo
22
05-04-2015 01:03 PM
BoilerUP
Regional
9
09-01-2007 04:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices