Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Leave and Early Out Numbers >

Leave and Early Out Numbers

Search

Notices

Leave and Early Out Numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2020 | 11:03 AM
  #91  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 9mikemike
Going to have to agree to disagree with ya Kotz. Not sure when we get done sliding down the icy scree that we will have dug in enough that we wont slip into the crevasse. By the way, are you joining me for a 24 month EIL as you promised. Still think the Anglers will panic and pull the plug on the EIL program....We are only safe from furlough on a 90 day rolling calendar
My vacation starts 10-1... Not near as noble as taking a leave with no pay, to save a life. 190k a year for nothing and total freedom, seems more on the selfish end of spectrum to me, I would like to think I did it to save a job.
Reply
Old 08-31-2020 | 03:28 PM
  #92  
Ted Striker's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 849
Likes: 15
From: B6
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
I have heard no new talk of furlough, AS management seems very happy with our current program. Our numbers are slowly coming in line with expectations, although slightly behind. I keep hearing CASH-Z by Q1 attainable. I have seen summer 2022 fleet projected 214, 227, and 252. Optimism is starting to build a little, I think many feel December will surprise. I know DP is in almost weekly contact with BT, having made multiple visits to Angle Lake. I was never a fan of DP, until I met him. I don’t know if this pandemic has humbled him, I would describe him as a gentleman, a really neat individual. I think there is a lot of potential there for us. I think a form of CARES 2 will happen. My personal opinion is the second 25 billion allocated for loans will become grants. I am pretty sure SFO is toast. I still don’t totally understand why, and have advocated for us keeping it. I still think single fleet will not happen tell 2024-25, unless we end up well bellow the expected recovery level. New enhanced lines for November will be tough to swallow for commuters, a non event for those who live in base. I still have to believe something is a foot with JetBlue... My guess would be next fall something drops.
What makes you think the AS/B6 connection?
Reply
Old 08-31-2020 | 08:54 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
My vacation starts 10-1... Not near as noble as taking a leave with no pay, to save a life. 190k a year for nothing and total freedom, seems more on the selfish end of spectrum to me, I would like to think I did it to save a job.
Agreed, however, last time-you remember. Was hoping with your influence you could get a higher percentage of senior people to take those EIL’s...Having given 1080 days last time with no benefit other then saving an FO’s job I am somewhat skeptical about Brad’s logic paying me to go away...Anyway, enjoy your vacation.
Reply
Old 09-06-2020 | 09:58 PM
  #94  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Can they do both? Furlough juniors, and keep seniors on EIL?
Rick, as far as I can tell, they almost have to. I’m pretty sure I read in the LOA that they can’t call back incentive lines early if there is anyone furloughed, which would indicate it’s a possibility to have both EILs and furloughs simultaneously. If they needed to furlough, it wouldn’t make sense to recall a bunch of Captains and senior FOs (let’s call that the expensive end of the list) just so they can chop off even more of the bottom of the list (the least expensive pilots) to attain the correct staffing numbers.
Reply
Old 09-07-2020 | 07:19 AM
  #95  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PBone
Rick, as far as I can tell, they almost have to. I’m pretty sure I read in the LOA that they can’t call back incentive lines early if there is anyone furloughed, which would indicate it’s a possibility to have both EILs and furloughs simultaneously. If they needed to furlough, it wouldn’t make sense to recall a bunch of Captains and senior FOs (let’s call that the expensive end of the list) just so they can chop off even more of the bottom of the list (the least expensive pilots) to attain the correct staffing numbers.
I think the furlough threat is extremely low for the next year or so. The company web site says the cash burn rate is down to 2.6 million a day and that's before any of the staff reductions that are taking place Oct 1. They could theoretically furlough with people on EIL if 2021 turns out to be a bust but would more likely negotiate with the union for other mitigation like another round of EILs, EIL extensions, or reduced bid blocks. Will be interesting to see the next bid that supposedly will be effective Jan 31.
Reply
Old 09-07-2020 | 08:56 PM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Default

The view from the top is now a long, slow, very sporadic trip back to where we once were...at least 2 years of significant overcapacity. They do not see the vaccine as a game changer. The entire premise of the EIL was to preserve capacity for a recovery in 2021. That target is steadily moving to the spring of 2024. I don’t think anyone in the bottom 1/3rd should get comfortable. And those of us with only the pension should not get comfortable either. Alaska Airlines does not care for the pilots, mechs, csa’s, f/a’s etc....Anyone that works in a union. The possibility that we right-size back to 2014 is not out of the question. EIL’s will all be recalled if that happens. The EIL program is causing a lot of heartburn with the top of the executive ranks right now.
Reply
Old 09-07-2020 | 09:11 PM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 936
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by 9mikemike
The view from the top is now a long, slow, very sporadic trip back to where we once were...at least 2 years of significant overcapacity. They do not see the vaccine as a game changer. The entire premise of the EIL was to preserve capacity for a recovery in 2021. That target is steadily moving to the spring of 2024. I don’t think anyone in the bottom 1/3rd should get comfortable. And those of us with only the pension should not get comfortable either. Alaska Airlines does not care for the pilots, mechs, csa’s, f/a’s etc....Anyone that works in a union. The possibility that we right-size back to 2014 is not out of the question. EIL’s will all be recalled if that happens. The EIL program is causing a lot of heartburn with the top of the executive ranks right now.
Too bad they did a half assed version of SWA program and left 12% on the table. SWA pilots got up to a 5 year option. We only got 2 years and in my base I was over 500 seniority numbers away from holding even 6 months.

The program would have been a lot more effective if management didn't choose a weak version of a program meant to keep an airline viable but ready to quickly seize market share. If you pick a weak version you don't get either option.

The jr pilots will get to pay the price for it.
Reply
Old 09-08-2020 | 09:10 AM
  #98  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 579
Likes: 30
Default

Originally Posted by 9mikemike
The view from the top is now a long, slow, very sporadic trip back to where we once were...at least 2 years of significant overcapacity. They do not see the vaccine as a game changer. The entire premise of the EIL was to preserve capacity for a recovery in 2021. That target is steadily moving to the spring of 2024. I don’t think anyone in the bottom 1/3rd should get comfortable. And those of us with only the pension should not get comfortable either. Alaska Airlines does not care for the pilots, mechs, csa’s, f/a’s etc....Anyone that works in a union. The possibility that we right-size back to 2014 is not out of the question. EIL’s will all be recalled if that happens. The EIL program is causing a lot of heartburn with the top of the executive ranks right now.
I agree, I’m still guessing that ultimately around 30% will be furloughed. The people that run this airline will not tolerate losing money by way of paying pilots to stay home for very long.
Reply
Old 09-08-2020 | 10:37 AM
  #99  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,874
Likes: 671
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by flysnoopy76
I agree, I’m still guessing that ultimately around 30% will be furloughed. The people that run this airline will not tolerate losing money by way of paying pilots to stay home for very long.
They're probably torn between the agony of paying pilots to stay home and the very real possibility of SWA (or maybe even ULCC) swooping in and eating their lunch during a recovery. Nobody knows how quickly or steeply a recovery might occur. My guess is that any airline which can actually afford to will wait a few months and see how the vaccine thing plays out. Somewhat a game of chicken right now.
Reply
Old 09-08-2020 | 07:25 PM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
They're probably torn between the agony of paying pilots to stay home and the very real possibility of SWA (or maybe even ULCC) swooping in and eating their lunch during a recovery. Nobody knows how quickly or steeply a recovery might occur. My guess is that any airline which can actually afford to will wait a few months and see how the vaccine thing plays out. Somewhat a game of chicken right now.
Where the strength of the PNW and Alaska play a huge role. Reducing the exposure of California will likely pay big in the end. The Anglers are not worried about someone else swooping in on them. They have always taken the “ long distance runner”approach. They will shrink back, pay off debt, return to a Boeing fleet.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mikea72580
Delta
5
05-30-2020 11:07 AM
gzsg
Delta
192
05-16-2020 06:23 PM
racer847
Military
7
04-10-2018 02:02 PM
Albief15
Cargo
17
08-31-2014 05:45 AM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices