Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Leave and Early Out Numbers >

Leave and Early Out Numbers

Search

Notices

Leave and Early Out Numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2020 | 02:43 PM
  #131  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by greatlake
I think the single fleet makes us very attractive to Southwest.
And what would they do with Horizon?
Reply
Old 09-12-2020 | 03:06 PM
  #132  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ELAC321
And what would they do with Horizon?
Sell to Skywest or spin it off as it's own company and have them do the inter-Alaska flying.
Reply
Old 09-12-2020 | 03:35 PM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 936
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by greatlake
I think the single fleet makes us very attractive to Southwest.

Pops some popcorn for landings on contaminated runways in the state of Alaska 40 knots over ref.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 09-12-2020 | 05:50 PM
  #134  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 57
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by 9mikemike
With the airline business essentially”dead in the water” growth is no longer part of anyone’s plan. Labor Day 2024 will likely see the airline business back to 2019 levels. We will likely be single-fleet by that time. Paying down debt will be the focus so that we can survive the follow-on recession that will show up in 2026. Could be another lost decade in the making
thats a bit draconian... 2024.. why not just say 2065. Nobody knows. Keep in kind we don’t need to get to 2019 levels. Within 25% of 2019, and we hit 45% sept 4. My guess is 65% by next summer if not better. Long and slow but steady.
Reply
Old 09-12-2020 | 06:07 PM
  #135  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by Elismcpikle
thats a bit draconian... 2024.. why not just say 2065. Nobody knows. Keep in kind we don’t need to get to 2019 levels. Within 25% of 2019, and we hit 45% sept 4. My guess is 65% by next summer if not better. Long and slow but steady.
Heard the flows for AA wholly owned is going to be 50 years. Came from a friend of a friend’s FA mechanic lover’s cousin three times removed.
Reply
Old 09-12-2020 | 10:21 PM
  #136  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Elismcpikle
thats a bit draconian... 2024.. why not just say 2065. Nobody knows. Keep in kind we don’t need to get to 2019 levels. Within 25% of 2019, and we hit 45% sept 4. My guess is 65% by next summer if not better. Long and slow but steady.
Hmmm....45% this year, 50-65% next year, 75-80% in 2023 which would put us at 100% in 2024. It is the math that the Anglers are using to formulate their business plan. It certainly was not my idea. They are saying 12-20 months after a vaccination/ therapy protocol to get leisure travel back and another 18-24 months beyond that for business travel....Draconian would be furloughing 500 pilots in the fall of 2021
Reply
Old 09-13-2020 | 07:03 AM
  #137  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,923
Likes: 697
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by LonesomeSky
The pilots will be begging for a Bay Area 737 co-base soon: SFO, SJC, Oak, and SFO... If you keep your camper truck parked on a side street in Fruitvale you should be able to make that 2 hour reserve call out no matter which airport they send you to.
You'd need a 6-hour callout.
Reply
Old 09-13-2020 | 12:03 PM
  #138  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Default

Not really. Reserves only cover the primary airport in a co-terminal.
Reply
Old 09-13-2020 | 09:29 PM
  #139  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rmcbear08
Any insight as to why? On the webcast today they kept talking about “recapturing the California market.” Seems counterintuitive to then close a base in a major California city. Why not just keep it with 73s? Closing SFO is the biggest head-scratcher to me, but then again I don’t have access to all the information.
CA is important to AS, it is vital to our OneWorld strategy. SFO is tricky, simply put many small bases have a significant cost in staffing. Small bases in particular have huge cost in over manning and RSV coverage. We want to have the most productive pilot group in the industry, they feel we get there with fewer bases.
Reply
Old 09-13-2020 | 09:33 PM
  #140  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ELAC321
And what would they do with Horizon?
Way to early to tell. LUV, most likely would pay the penalty to Skywest and turn out the lights at QX. An Alaska Blue merger, my guess is management would like to modify JetBlue scope and keep the EJets running seats.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mikea72580
Delta
5
05-30-2020 11:07 AM
gzsg
Delta
192
05-16-2020 06:23 PM
racer847
Military
7
04-10-2018 02:02 PM
Albief15
Cargo
17
08-31-2014 05:45 AM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices