Allegiant Air
#1571
Banned
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
From: 7th green
Alaska was in BLI (QX) before Allegiant even opened their doors.
#1572
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: Back in school.
Alaska doesn't want you. They especially don't want 67 MDs, an aircraft they phased out years ago...you're flying some of their old jets. And they don't want either the Airbus or the 757 either.
Alaska is perfectly happy flying BLI to Hawaii with their jets and everywhere else using Horizon to connect to the rest of the system. If Allegiant disappeared from BLI, Alaska would ramp up with big jets. Why would they take you to get into an airport they're already in AND pioneered for YOU?
Alaska is perfectly happy flying BLI to Hawaii with their jets and everywhere else using Horizon to connect to the rest of the system. If Allegiant disappeared from BLI, Alaska would ramp up with big jets. Why would they take you to get into an airport they're already in AND pioneered for YOU?
#1575
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Alaska doesn't want you. They especially don't want 67 MDs, an aircraft they phased out years ago...you're flying some of their old jets. And they don't want either the Airbus or the 757 either.
Alaska is perfectly happy flying BLI to Hawaii with their jets and everywhere else using Horizon and Lots of Skywest(because the old guys that left and got plenty of theirs, left No Scope whatsoever)to connect to the rest of the system. If Allegiant disappeared from BLI, Alaska would ramp up with big jets. Why would they take you to get into an airport they're already in AND pioneered for YOU?
Alaska is perfectly happy flying BLI to Hawaii with their jets and everywhere else using Horizon and Lots of Skywest(because the old guys that left and got plenty of theirs, left No Scope whatsoever)to connect to the rest of the system. If Allegiant disappeared from BLI, Alaska would ramp up with big jets. Why would they take you to get into an airport they're already in AND pioneered for YOU?
Last edited by Xbone; 01-23-2015 at 09:21 AM.
#1576
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
I don't want to get into a "my airline is better than your airline" ****ing match. It's juvenile and plays into management's hands. I have nothing against Alaska and we have several of our fine pilots who went to fly for them. Packrat obviously has some deep-seeded hatred for all things Allegiant. I don't know why and a really don't care. Fellow AAY pilots, let's ignore this noise that is distracting us from whats really important: a new contract and a safe, reputable operation.
#1577
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
If you are now at NJ, I’ll tell you who doesn’t want you. The oracle. If buffet could get away with flushing NJ down the toilet tomorrow, he would. Why do you think he allows a boy ceo to run the place? Hansell’s last job before taking the reigns at NJ, was working in his daddy’s law firm, which specializes in union busting. Good luck with that. Hansell is there to wring out every last dime.
#1578
Banned
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: Da Bus
Alaska doesn't want you. They especially don't want 67 MDs, an aircraft they phased out years ago...you're flying some of their old jets. And they don't want either the Airbus or the 757 either.
Alaska is perfectly happy flying BLI to Hawaii with their jets and everywhere else using Horizon to connect to the rest of the system. If Allegiant disappeared from BLI, Alaska would ramp up with big jets. Why would they take you to get into an airport they're already in AND pioneered for YOU?
Alaska is perfectly happy flying BLI to Hawaii with their jets and everywhere else using Horizon to connect to the rest of the system. If Allegiant disappeared from BLI, Alaska would ramp up with big jets. Why would they take you to get into an airport they're already in AND pioneered for YOU?
#1579
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Ok boys and girls, looks like VA be getting some love from Branson. And VA hasn’t been half as profitable as this cash cow. W T F over!
Yep.
Effective 4-1-15:
Capt
160
166
168
171
173
175
178
180
182
185
187
189
FO
52
85
98
104
109
113
116
118
120
123
124
125
Increase in 401k to 12% total.
First 7.5% is 125% matching on pilot's 6% contribution.
Remaining 4.5% is automatic and doesn't require pilot contribution (so if you contribute 0 you still get 4.5%). And, the 4.5% doesn't count toward IRS limits, so it's more like a DCP but within the existing 401k.
Profit sharing formula now based on pure earnings, no algebraic formula based on earnings + longevity (that they capped at 3 years last year).
Won't stop the upcoming(?) card drive, but may reduce some numbers.
I don't think anyone expected this!
Effective 4-1-15:
Capt
160
166
168
171
173
175
178
180
182
185
187
189
FO
52
85
98
104
109
113
116
118
120
123
124
125
Increase in 401k to 12% total.
First 7.5% is 125% matching on pilot's 6% contribution.
Remaining 4.5% is automatic and doesn't require pilot contribution (so if you contribute 0 you still get 4.5%). And, the 4.5% doesn't count toward IRS limits, so it's more like a DCP but within the existing 401k.
Profit sharing formula now based on pure earnings, no algebraic formula based on earnings + longevity (that they capped at 3 years last year).
Won't stop the upcoming(?) card drive, but may reduce some numbers.
I don't think anyone expected this!
#1580
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



