Search

Notices

Furlough Estimates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2020 | 04:26 PM
  #621  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Bus drivins’ harder on ur head than on ur feet
Default

I can’t believe no one’s brought up not negotiating in public?
Reply
Old 07-27-2020 | 07:13 PM
  #622  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by riel39
I can’t believe no one’s brought up not negotiating in public?
As if it even matters? It's like rearranging the chairs on the Titanic at this point.
Reply
Old 07-28-2020 | 04:56 AM
  #623  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 316
Default

Originally Posted by Andrew_VT
I'd like to add one more vote for

Fewer hours = possibly good idea if it stops furloughs

Lower pay rate/benefits/rigs = Hard no
This is how it goes down. Fewer hours, no furloughs. A few months come by, company comes back after paying everyone fewer hours and says we need to furlough again or we need more from the pilot group.

This isn't just an American problem. All the legacies are reading from the same playbook.
Reply
Old 07-28-2020 | 07:05 AM
  #624  
New Hire
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

Spoiler
 
  • 
Reply
Old 07-28-2020 | 07:37 AM
  #625  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
This is how it goes down. Fewer hours, no furloughs. A few months come by, company comes back after paying everyone fewer hours and says we need to furlough again or we need more from the pilot group.

This isn't just an American problem. All the legacies are reading from the same playbook.
I agree with you. I think all the carriers are going to try to level us down a bit
Reply
Old 07-28-2020 | 07:58 AM
  #626  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Default

FWIW, the ORD CA rep on the zoom call last night seemed to be of the opinion that reduced ALVs is pretty much the same thing as VSTLOAs. Therefore, he doesn't want to support it. I personally disagree with that view.

Reduced ALVs would give pilots greater flexibility with their schedules. Those who want to fly more are able to pick up open time and/or trade into higher time trips. As flying picks up over the next year, ALVs will have to increase organically to keep up with demand. So it's basically letting our line values fluctuate with market forces, all the while not forcing anyone to fly 80+ hours a month if they don't want to.

Not to mention the cost savings to the company, and therefore the possibility of avoiding furloughs. If anyone else agrees I suggest sending soundoffs and an email to the negotiating committee expressing your view points.
Reply
Old 07-28-2020 | 08:32 PM
  #627  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FetaCheese
FWIW, the ORD CA rep on the zoom call last night seemed to be of the opinion that reduced ALVs is pretty much the same thing as VSTLOAs. Therefore, he doesn't want to support it. I personally disagree with that view.

Reduced ALVs would give pilots greater flexibility with their schedules. Those who want to fly more are able to pick up open time and/or trade into higher time trips. As flying picks up over the next year, ALVs will have to increase organically to keep up with demand. So it's basically letting our line values fluctuate with market forces, all the while not forcing anyone to fly 80+ hours a month if they don't want to.

Not to mention the cost savings to the company, and therefore the possibility of avoiding furloughs. If anyone else agrees I suggest sending soundoffs and an email to the negotiating committee expressing your view points.
Yeah but don't forget the company still has to pay for health insurance for the average family of 4, plus 401k, etc. Having reduced line values but keeping more pilots on payroll just makes each pilot more expensive on a per hour flown basis.

Gary Kelly was quoted today that he doesn't expect the industry to recover for 5 to 10 years. At that duration, unfortunately, it doesn't make sense not to furlough.
Reply
Old 07-28-2020 | 09:26 PM
  #628  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FullThrust
Gary Kelly was quoted today that he doesn't expect the industry to recover for 5 to 10 years. At that duration, unfortunately, it doesn't make sense not to furlough.
The fact of the matter is, nobody, not even an airline CEO should play Nostradamus with “predictions”. We live in an era where last month was completely different from this month, and next month may bring better news (or worse). There is no way Gary Kelly can predict 5-10 years aside from a crapshoot.

The only way I see us preventing furloughs has very little to do with the NC and everything to do with congress extending the CARES act and bailout funds for the airlines an addtl. 6 months, hoping that by March 2021 things start picking back up after a vaccine comes out (hopefully) by the end of the year or shortly thereafter.
Reply
Old 07-29-2020 | 03:26 AM
  #629  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by Da40Pilot
The fact of the matter is, nobody, not even an airline CEO should play Nostradamus with “predictions”. We live in an era where last month was completely different from this month, and next month may bring better news (or worse). There is no way Gary Kelly can predict 5-10 years aside from a crapshoot.

The only way I see us preventing furloughs has very little to do with the NC and everything to do with congress extending the CARES act and bailout funds for the airlines an addtl. 6 months, hoping that by March 2021 things start picking back up after a vaccine comes out (hopefully) by the end of the year or shortly thereafter.
Recovery isn’t projected to begin until 8-12 months after a vaccine is available. Without a government lifeline this whole industry very well may collapse.
Reply
Old 07-29-2020 | 05:10 AM
  #630  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by FullThrust
Yeah but don't forget the company still has to pay for health insurance for the average family of 4, plus 401k, etc. Having reduced line values but keeping more pilots on payroll just makes each pilot more expensive on a per hour flown basis.

Gary Kelly was quoted today that he doesn't expect the industry to recover for 5 to 10 years. At that duration, unfortunately, it doesn't make sense not to furlough.
His quote on that 5-10 year timeline was in regards to business travel.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
3raser
Cargo
21
12-22-2012 10:01 AM
DirectLawOnly
United
45
12-05-2012 05:39 AM
brownie
Cargo
201
03-05-2009 07:55 PM
E1Out
Major
41
09-20-2008 08:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices