Search

Notices

Plan for the 11 787p's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2025 | 09:30 AM
  #81  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 587
Likes: 53
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by MinimumEffort
Yes or at the very least a 1 for 1 replacement.
They are investing money in the 777s to keep them going longer and the rest of the 787s will all be here in within the next 5 years. You think they will shrink the fleet in 10 years when between now and then they will have to find flying for the planes we have, the ones they are getting and the 777s they are keeping? That would be growth and then contraction if they shrunk the large WB fleet in 10 years.
I hope you're right. The 777X would be sweet. From what I've seen of Isom I would expect him just to order a few more 787s and more XLRs. Shrink the total Group IV airframes and increase the 321XLR fleet to pick up the slack. Then they could offload whatever they can't fly to JV partners. We don't have eny scope requiring growth flying to be done by AA.
Reply
Old 07-09-2025 | 09:36 AM
  #82  
JulesWinfield's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 276
Default

Originally Posted by MinimumEffort
Given the current order books it will, 767s don't count.
Delta will have 145 large widebodies (330s, 350s) when their entire order book is delivered and AA will have 156 (787s, 777s).
The 1:1 replacement you referenced in a later post negates these numbers, right? We have 777s from the Clinton administration still flying. At some point, it won’t make sense to keep them operating. We’ve retreated in a lot of international markets.

I hope you’re right, but I’ll believe it when I see it.
Reply
Old 07-09-2025 | 10:06 AM
  #83  
CRJJ's Avatar
Line Holder
5 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 188
From: B747 FO
Default

My guess? Eventually more 787s and more XLRs, that’s about it.
Reply
Old 07-09-2025 | 10:45 AM
  #84  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 241
Likes: 18
Default

a350 is my guess, It's the perfect 777 replacement.
Reply
Old 07-09-2025 | 10:48 AM
  #85  
CRJJ's Avatar
Line Holder
5 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 188
From: B747 FO
Default

Originally Posted by MinimumEffort
a350 is my guess, It's the perfect 777 replacement.
“Perfect” and “logical” don’t usually apply to us. We had the orders and the SIM in place, and they let it go. Why would they bring all that back when they can save $0.50 if they order more 787s?. They don’t care about logic
Reply
Old 07-09-2025 | 10:48 AM
  #86  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 157
Likes: 67
Default

The doomerism amongst our pilot group is staggering sometimes.
Reply
Old 07-09-2025 | 10:52 AM
  #87  
CRJJ's Avatar
Line Holder
5 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 188
From: B747 FO
Default

Originally Posted by 8802
The doomerism amongst our pilot group is staggering sometimes.
Where’s the doomerism? Isn’t a fact we had those orders and a SIM already in place?
Reply
Old 07-09-2025 | 11:08 AM
  #88  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 157
Likes: 67
Default

Originally Posted by CRJJ
Where’s the doomerism? Isn’t a fact we had those orders and a SIM already in place?
The entire thread above?

Of course it's a fact that they canned the 350 orders and program. I remember the sim sitting in GSW training the initial cadre.

But everyone still acts like that happened yesterday and that they didn't fire the guy who led the charge to make that call. Vasu did that in 2018 and was fired last year. He did damage to our airline that will take at least a decade to repair.

Will they order 350's? More 78's? 77X? Who knows, but everyone acts like it is a certainty that we're going to shrink the widebody fleet with absolutely zero evidence to support it other than a gut feeling.

We fawn over DAL and UAL while the bulk of their widebody fleets are 25+ years old too.
Reply
Old 07-09-2025 | 11:29 AM
  #89  
Ripinpeace's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 456
Likes: 53
Default

Originally Posted by MinimumEffort
Given the current order books it will, 767s don't count.
Delta will have 145 large widebodies (330s, 350s) when their entire order book is delivered and AA will have 156 (787s, 777s).
“..when their entire order book is delivered”. Delta notoriously doesn’t order many years out - in fact the wide-body order book extends just to 2028. The 20 options from the 35K is assuredly going to exercised soon as well per DL’s historical ordering practices. No US carrier will order the 777X (simply too big) and you say AA will 1:1 the 777’s for more WB’s but refuse to think DL will do the same to their 763 WB’s?

Existing 330’s are replacing 763’s - what’s replacing those pulled 330’s? (787 possibly 2029-2030 or more 330 orders). Delta hasn’t made those orders yet - DL is a WB Airbus carrier and the tariffs will shake things up on timetables/potentially going to Boeing.

United’s order book extends into deep 2030’s (~240 WB’s with all 787+777-300ER when it’s done) and American’s until 2029. If you add DL’s 764+350+330 fleet in addition to existing WB orders and options it equates to 186 WB aircraft by 2028.

Other factors:
1) Delta’s new Global Scope which will force Delta to grow 1:1 WB hours with all partners.. IndiGo & Riyadh set to be Delta partners - Asiana merging into Skyteam. VS, LATAM, AM, WS, SK, MU, CI are all growing in WB’s - DL has too match each one.
2) Delta’s desire for WB’s TATL vs. NB (no desire for XLR).
3) AMS/CDG/ICN much more room to accommodate TPAC/TATL growth vs. LHR/HND/MAD
4) AA is retreating in JFK, giving AS its west-coast flying/no AA west-coast hub, its European partners incentivize (due to be so close to Atlantic side) no AA-overflying of LHR/MAD. DL has three strong TATL gateways (BOS, ATL, JFK) and two TPAC (LAX, SEA). [Two WB categories added less than a year apart BOS330/SEA350 and SLC350 becoming more likely soon with JFK350 becoming more of a reality after the 35K arrival].
5) AA has no scope protection and weaker financial footing at the moment vs. Delta whom is focusing on intl. growth

I expect by mid 2030’s UA will have around 240 pay-scale WB’s, AA at 180, and DL at 220 give or take. AA can absolutely turn it all around and acutely start growing intl. at some point, but quit trying to downplay Delta’s current game plan. The days of “DL shipping WB’s to JV’s” are assuredly over with the Scope addition - more JV’s/partner’s now = more DL WB flying.

https://d2r1lrrqctgamh.cloudfront.ne...A/NN-23-03.pdf
Reply
Old 07-09-2025 | 11:42 AM
  #90  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 969
Likes: 261
Default

Originally Posted by Ripinpeace
“..when their entire order book is delivered”. Delta notoriously doesn’t order many years out - in fact the wide-body order book extends just to 2028. The 20 options from the 35K is assuredly going to exercised soon as well per DL’s historical ordering practices. No US carrier will order the 777X (simply too big) and you say AA will 1:1 the 777’s for more WB’s but refuse to think DL will do the same to their 763 WB’s?

Existing 330’s are replacing 763’s - what’s replacing those pulled 330’s? (787 possibly 2029-2030 or more 330 orders). Delta hasn’t made those orders yet - DL is a WB Airbus carrier and the tariffs will shake things up on timetables/potentially going to Boeing.

United’s order book extends into deep 2030’s (~240 WB’s with all 787+777-300ER when it’s done) and American’s until 2029. If you add DL’s 764+350+330 fleet in addition to existing WB orders and options it equates to 186 WB aircraft by 2028.

Other factors:
1) Delta’s new Global Scope which will force Delta to grow 1:1 WB hours with all partners.. IndiGo & Riyadh set to be Delta partners - Asiana merging into Skyteam. VS, LATAM, AM, WS, SK, MU, CI are all growing in WB’s - DL has too match each one.
2) Delta’s desire for WB’s TATL vs. NB (no desire for XLR).
3) AMS/CDG/ICN much more room to accommodate TPAC/TATL growth vs. LHR/HND/MAD
4) AA is retreating in JFK, giving AS its west-coast flying/no AA west-coast hub, its European partners incentivize (due to be so close to Atlantic side) no AA-overflying of LHR/MAD. DL has three strong TATL gateways (BOS, ATL, JFK) and two TPAC (LAX, SEA). [Two WB categories added less than a year apart BOS330/SEA350 and SLC350 becoming more likely soon with JFK350 becoming more of a reality after the 35K arrival].
5) AA has no scope protection and weaker financial footing at the moment vs. Delta whom is focusing on intl. growth

I expect by mid 2030’s UA will have around 240 pay-scale WB’s, AA at 180, and DL at 220 give or take. AA can absolutely turn it all around and acutely start growing intl. at some point, but quit trying to downplay Delta’s current game plan. The days of “DL shipping WB’s to JV’s” are assuredly over with the Scope addition - more JV’s/partner’s now = more DL WB flying.

https://d2r1lrrqctgamh.cloudfront.ne...A/NN-23-03.pdf
Oh look, the one no one cares about has thoughts…
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kronan
FedEx
241
07-12-2021 10:46 AM
ApachePhil
Delta
1474
07-19-2020 03:12 AM
Flaps50
FedEx
129
12-17-2017 05:09 PM
Sir James
Money Talk
2
09-30-2005 06:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices