Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
American interviews and class dates >

American interviews and class dates

Search

Notices

American interviews and class dates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2017 | 07:21 AM
  #5641  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Laker24
Very few items in the contract affect all pilots. If I'm senior then I don't care about reserve rules, minimum day, domestic hotels, etc. why waste negotiating leverage on the 10% of junior reserves? Or if you are junior and above 50 why do you care about GIV pay or work rules? Many contract provisions deal with minority interests. The issue is whether or not AA pilots deserve an industry standard contract. LOS is industry standard. I think it's particularly irritating for an ex TWA pilot to hear a 30-something third lister hired 20 years later and senior complaining about LOS. Lots of the LOS pilots have been getting thrown under the bus for literally decades.
I assume you are referring to me when you mention a “30-something third lister hired 20 years later.” Trust me you know nothing about me. I agree it is about an industry standard contract and a better LOS is industry standard and we should have that. The issue is why are we throwing the baby out with the bath water? Are we really willing to sacrifice numerous other gains at the expense of this single gain that affects only 10% of the group? Sure calandra day doesn’t affect everyone. But colander day and pilot only profit sharing and better retirement healthcare and better work rules do affect everyone. ALL of those, and many others, are now NOT open for discussion because our negotiating committee is under a union imposed obligation to negotiate NOTHING unless LOS is resolved first. Sorry but your argument doesn’t pass the smell test.
Reply
Old 11-12-2017 | 01:24 PM
  #5642  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mainlineAF
This LOS crusade has gotten out of control. It better not have a negative effect on section 6 openers.
If the LOS NOW folks (NOW!!) want to get new hires on their side, they need to tie in true LOS that this company is industry lagging in as well.

Meaning date of hire = date of pay. AFAIK we are the only airline where your pay bump starts after training and not on your date of hire anniversary. With our lagging training dept, that means 3 months difference on average, which is around $15k lost for each new hire.
Reply
Old 11-12-2017 | 01:26 PM
  #5643  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Laker24
Very few items in the contract affect all pilots. If I'm senior then I don't care about reserve rules, minimum day, domestic hotels, etc. why waste negotiating leverage on the 10% of junior reserves? Or if you are junior and above 50 why do you care about GIV pay or work rules? Many contract provisions deal with minority interests. The issue is whether or not AA pilots deserve an industry standard contract. LOS is industry standard. I think it's particularly irritating for an ex TWA pilot to hear a 30-something third lister hired 20 years later and senior complaining about LOS. Lots of the LOS pilots have been getting thrown under the bus for literally decades.
Was TWA not a dying (Dead) airline?
Reply
Old 11-12-2017 | 03:41 PM
  #5644  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by Mover
Was TWA not a dying (Dead) airline?
It was flying right up until the day it became AA branded. Most of the problem that drove TWA into the arms of AA was the corporate radar, Carl Icahn.

It was recovering and looked like it was going to make it (I was good friends with one of the chief financial guys, grew up two houses from him). Then Icahn came in, and he sold off all the Heathrow landing slots (and other profitable pieces) and paid the money to himself as primary shareholder, instead of reinvesting it. These cash cows were paying for fleet replacement and other improvements. His actions stopped that dead in its tracks.

Further, as part of his exit, he set up a complicated ticket structure so every profitable ticket on major routes was sold by Icahn doing business as TWA’s ticket reseller. He then paid the real TWA much less than what it cost to operate those flights. The higher load factor TWA had, the more money they lost and the more profits Icahn retained as a ticket reseller. If TWA reduced the number of flights to a city, they made more money and Icahn made less money. Consumers were paying fair ticket prices, which if went solely to the airline, would have shown a profit. With Icahn’s set up, it was impossible to show a profit. (Even if Spirit and Frontier were charging legacy fares, if they had Icahn, they could not have made money.)

Not to ask for sympathy (it is what it is), but the experienced finance people saw TWA was going to pull out of the dive and grow, if it were not for Icahn. He literally drove/forced TWA into the arms of AA, instead of reorganizing and continuing long term. At least, at that point, if it were to occur, an AA-TWA merger would have been of two equals, with both having similar leverage in negotiations.

Of course 9/11 did not help.
Reply
Old 11-12-2017 | 03:51 PM
  #5645  
ItnStln's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld
It was flying right up until the day it became AA branded. Most of the problem that drove TWA into the arms of AA was the corporate radar, Carl Icahn.

It was recovering and looked like it was going to make it (I was good friends with one of the chief financial guys, grew up two houses from him). Then Icahn came in, and he sold off all the Heathrow landing slots (and other profitable pieces) and paid the money to himself as primary shareholder, instead of reinvesting it. These cash cows were paying for fleet replacement and other improvements. His actions stopped that dead in its tracks.

Further, as part of his exit, he set up a complicated ticket structure so every profitable ticket on major routes was sold by Icahn doing business as TWA’s ticket reseller. He then paid the real TWA much less than what it cost to operate those flights. The higher load factor TWA had, the more money they lost and the more profits Icahn retained as a ticket reseller. If TWA reduced the number of flights to a city, they made more money and Icahn made less money. Consumers were paying fair ticket prices, which if went solely to the airline, would have shown a profit. With Icahn’s set up, it was impossible to show a profit. (Even if Spirit and Frontier were charging legacy fares, if they had Icahn, they could not have made money.)

Not to ask for sympathy (it is what it is), but the experienced finance people saw TWA was going to pull out of the dive and grow, if it were not for Icahn. He literally drove/forced TWA into the arms of AA, instead of reorganizing and continuing long term. At least, at that point, if it were to occur, an AA-TWA merger would have been of two equals, with both having similar leverage in negotiations.

Of course 9/11 did not help.
How did Carl Icahn get by with that?
Reply
Old 11-12-2017 | 04:02 PM
  #5646  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by ItnStln
How did Carl Icahn get by with that?
He bought the majority share of the company. A majority vote of shareholders (him) can vote to sell anything and any part of the company. That is not against the law.

After all, if he had voted his majority shares to sell all the planes and start selling turnips as the sole business of TWA, he would have been legally permitted to do it.

He did have to do some fancy footwork to avoid the “self-dealing” laws for the ticketing arrangement.

Almost every TWA employee has a visceral hate for Icahn, even to this day.

If you talk to the former TWA employees (both current AA and retirees) you will find a tremendous sense of pride as it (and Pan Am) were the face of the United States passenger aviation around the world.

But hey, it is what it is, current employees move on. Suck it up, too much of an adult to be a snowflake.
Reply
Old 11-12-2017 | 04:10 PM
  #5647  
ItnStln's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld
He bought the majority share of the company. A majority vote of shareholders (him) can vote to sell anything and any part of the company. That is not against the law.

After all, if he had voted his majority shares to sell all the planes and start selling turnips as the sole business of TWA, he would have been legally permitted to do it.

He did have to do some fancy footwork to avoid the “self-dealing” laws for the ticketing arrangement.

Almost every TWA employee has a visceral hate for Icahn, even to this day.

If you talk to the former TWA employees (both current AA and retirees) you will find a tremendous sense of pride as it (and Pan Am) were the face of the United States passenger aviation around the world.

But hey, it is what it is, current employees move on. Suck it up, too much of an adult to be a snowflake.
I didn't know Icahn was the majority shareholder. What ever happened to the TWA name? Does AA still own it?
Reply
Old 11-12-2017 | 04:35 PM
  #5648  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

Originally Posted by ItnStln
I didn't know Icahn was the majority shareholder. What ever happened to the TWA name? Does AA still own it?
I think it evaporated. Left in the contrails someplace. (Likely AA still owns it on paper to avoid someone restarting a ‘new’ TWA, a la Frontier and Eastern.)

If you ever are in Kansas City and have time on your hands, there are two museums I can recommend, at the old MKC, downtown airport (like landing and taking off in a teacup. Cliffs a mile north of the runway, skyscrapers of downtown a mile south of the runway. In 1972 they moved all commercial flights to MCI, 12 miles to the north. Now nothing but fields on the long approaches.)

There is a TWA museum and an old aircraft museum. My favorite there is a Super Connie. You can go in and look around. All restored by TWA retirees.

I can also recommend the nations only WWI museum at the Liberty Memorial spire/eternal flame and the Country Club Plaza shopping area Christmas lights (Thanksgiving to New Year’s).

And yes, I grew up there.
Reply
Old 11-12-2017 | 04:37 PM
  #5649  
TransWorld's Avatar
Gets Everyday Off
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 1
From: Fully Retired
Default

We now return you to the topic of this thread.
Reply
Old 11-13-2017 | 12:28 PM
  #5650  
ItnStln's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld
I think it evaporated. Left in the contrails someplace. (Likely AA still owns it on paper to avoid someone restarting a ‘new’ TWA, a la Frontier and Eastern.)

If you ever are in Kansas City and have time on your hands, there are two museums I can recommend, at the old MKC, downtown airport (like landing and taking off in a teacup. Cliffs a mile north of the runway, skyscrapers of downtown a mile south of the runway. In 1972 they moved all commercial flights to MCI, 12 miles to the north. Now nothing but fields on the long approaches.)

There is a TWA museum and an old aircraft museum. My favorite there is a Super Connie. You can go in and look around. All restored by TWA retirees.

I can also recommend the nations only WWI museum at the Liberty Memorial spire/eternal flame and the Country Club Plaza shopping area Christmas lights (Thanksgiving to New Year’s).

And yes, I grew up there.
Thanks TransWorld I'll check them out if I'm ever in Kansas City since I enjoy both aviation and museums. The Super Connie is a nice looking aircraft and I like the one that the Breitling team has. I assumed AA is keeping the TWA name on paper and I'd say the same for the US Air/US Airways name.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
easyflyer
FedEx
1248
05-24-2016 09:38 AM
heading180
Regional
6398
08-18-2014 01:11 PM
ERJ135
American
26
02-26-2013 05:54 PM
B1900YX
Regional
67
07-22-2011 07:46 AM
F9forME
Frontier
4
11-04-2006 01:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices