JCBA timeline extension
#701
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
I'm not "dilusional" [sic]. And I'm not going to be happy sticking it to the man. I was just explaining to you how things work in the real business world by giving you a specific example.
#702
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,434
Likes: 124
From: Window seat
1. I think some people are over estimating the value of the company not wanting to go into arbitration.
2. The total lost pay is about 5% over the next six years. Yes, it's real money but it's not the end of the world.
3. There's a VERY SLIGHT chance that percentage will get reduced if DL/UA sign an agreement prior to 1/1/2016. It will still be a loss but the amount will be reduced.
2. The total lost pay is about 5% over the next six years. Yes, it's real money but it's not the end of the world.
3. There's a VERY SLIGHT chance that percentage will get reduced if DL/UA sign an agreement prior to 1/1/2016. It will still be a loss but the amount will be reduced.
#704
Banned
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: A320 F/O
Real business world? You think a highly paid sports figure's contract is the same as the hundreds of millions of others working in a corporate environment? Hell most people don't even have a contract.
A great example is how everyone is up in arms about having to go to work ONCE IN THREE MONTHS to do some bounces at night. What a joke!
Yep, definitely delusional.
#705
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
So...lemme get this straight. The process that was overwhelmingly voted for, to obtain the pay average of the highest paying competitors, is not only not "good enough" but is so bad that people are going to drag their feet for half a DECADE to show how upset they are by getting EXACTLY what they voted for in the first place?
This has to be a twilight zone epispode.
I honestly don't think pilots could survive in a normal corporate world.
This has to be a twilight zone epispode.
I honestly don't think pilots could survive in a normal corporate world.

What MANY are saying is that they are PERFECTLY ready to accept what they voted for in the first place. Yet, you are here repeatedly arguing against that (taking what's offered) and now concurrently criticizing them for NOT doing that (accepting what we agreed to) ?
Totally illogical, unless..........
Look, Doug CAN have a Delta competitor for less then Delta pilots compensation (as a package) and the APA is willing to give him that, because lets face it we're not going to get that (as a package NOW), but that's not good enough for Doug. Doug wants MORE and he wants to do so convincing us we should be happy we are giving him Delta for even less then the inferior compensation we are willing to accept then Delta pilots do it for. Many senior Easties don't care and just want their drug, but I'm sorry, this ISN'T US Airways, it's AA. The "old" AA for sure, but if Doug wanted to really change this carrier like he promised and reneged on, he'd have not done this to us in this way. So, we take what WE agreed to and Doug gets the old AA which must be clearly what he's prepared to accept.
Let's get on with arbitration and MOVE ON !
Last edited by eaglefly; 11-20-2014 at 08:05 AM.
#706
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Think like Parker does. He does not think like you do. Parker does not believe that a motivated pilot group is necessary to his plan to become a leading carrier. He does not believe that a POed pilot group will create a LCC. Here is what he thinks. "You're hissed off? So what? Your problem. Shut that door there. Sit in your seat up there and fly this airplane safety to point B over there. There. Now, good pilot."
Everyone will at least then be on the same page and that's a good thing !
We ALL wanted positive change here as that was the PRIMARY reason APA thought Parker was the better bet. Obviously that was a mistake, so it appears the future is set and I see no differences then in the past and the past was a failure.
Last edited by eaglefly; 11-20-2014 at 08:08 AM.
#707
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
EF, I'm not talking about anyone specifically. But just browsing through here and C&R, I've seen a number of posts stating "the only way I'm voting yes is if we have (insert ILC language)". That's what I'm speaking about, and I'm just stating that there's no way we're going to see any of that before 2020. That's just the reality.
Most of us exist somewhere in the middle of the bell.
#708
Banned
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Just sayin..........
#709
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
If you don't listen to anything else that I say, know that the one thing that I have gleaned from being a "beaten down" US pilot is that if it ain't in very specific writing Parker will make your life miserable.
At the very moment that Parker got AA to throw Horton out, the employees became nothing but red ink- forever. Parker is never ever going to look at labor any other way. Shareholders like it. The board likes it. He's doing his job. At this point, I don't care which way this goes but at least know who you are dealing with. He is not offering you early money for nothin. You are not a human being. You are red ink and he will get it somewhere else.
#710
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
And it is totally absurd for the vast majority of us. Those who could leave would have done so already and those who could leave but haven't still think that their lives will be different- and hopefully it will.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



