Search

Notices

MEC Alert

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2019 | 02:13 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
We got three tranches of stock options. The only one worth anything was the first one and you had to have sold that almost immediately upon it becoming vested. (There was a year vesting period for each tranche iirc. And each tranche was a year apart). The second two tranches were never worth a thing.

Sooooooo did you exercise them at 100+ a share? If you did, just like esop preferred shares at $72, they went to zero in the bankruptcy. They were worthless.

Denny
Ya forgot the 3 allocations...i think the lucky ones exited the first at the high around $130.

Options are always a gamble. Sometimes a lot....and sometimes 0.

The esop issue was really the stick in the eye. Sold as a lbo poison pill help out with a guaranteed value.....sound familiar?

We should only engage in tangible financial transactions with our employer.
Reply
Old 07-16-2019 | 02:38 PM
  #52  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 304
Default

Originally Posted by Denny Crane
Ya know I find this a bit hypocritical and I’ll tell you why. You want stock options but don’t want some type of retirement plan improvement. Based on history you shouldn’t want either one. The last time we got stock options they turned out to be basically be worthless........kinda like the pension plan.



Denny
Denny my friend, I'm a huge supporter of retirement plan improvement. As long as the improvements are in our name, in our control, and equally distributed amongst the pilot group.

Now as far as stock options yes there are risks to investing with your employer but you have to look at the big picture to evaluate if there are forces in play that mitigate the risk. There is a gigantic difference between the old Delta and the behemoth we work for today. Delta is a very strong cashflowing business with a wide moat. Warren Buffet would not touch any of the old airlines, let alone Delta. He's now the largest shareholder in Delta. Delta made more money in the 2nd quarter than Delta's FULL YEAR Profit in 85 out of 90 years of business. Delta is an oligopoly just like the Telecoms (Verizon/AT&T etc).

The only thing stopping the Delta machine is an Epic Black Swan(Nuclear War, Zombie Apocalypse etc).

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Last edited by Trip7; 07-16-2019 at 02:48 PM.
Reply
Old 07-16-2019 | 02:50 PM
  #53  
Denny Crane's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,971
Likes: 0
From: Kickin’ Back
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Denny my friend, I'm a huge supporter of retirement plan improvement. As long as the improvements are in our name, in our control, and equally distributed amongst the pilot group

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Ok. My bad. I will say I don’t think all of your requirements can possibly be met...

Denny
Reply
Old 07-16-2019 | 02:59 PM
  #54  
Der Meister's Avatar
Line Holder
15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 941
Likes: 30
From: 320A
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
It's a Brave New World we are in. A350 Captains hitting 7 figures and Delta still bringing in over 5 Bills a year. We seriously need to look into stock options.
Give me the max 401k company contribution, and then another 10k in stock options a year. I'll call that a quality retirement option...

Best part is it's all tax deferred.. hold the stock for a year and then sell then pay a much lower tax rate then the DSP cash is taxed at. And it's also in our name. Win win
Reply
Old 07-16-2019 | 03:04 PM
  #55  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 304
Default

Originally Posted by Der Meister
Give me the max 401k company contribution, and then another 10k in stock options a year. I'll call that a quality retirement option...



Best part is it's all tax deferred.. hold the stock for a year and then sell then pay a much lower tax rate then the DSP cash is taxed at. And it's also in our name. Win win
Agree 100%. This would a good grassroots movement to get started with our LEC Reps

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 07-16-2019 | 03:12 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Default

No no no....we must turn our money over to management for a promise to pay us back.

We simply do not have the capacity to be entrusted with our own money and financial well being.

Lets hope like alpa fdx we arent wasting money and negotiating capital on a bust.
Reply
Old 07-16-2019 | 03:28 PM
  #57  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Der Meister
Give me the max 401k company contribution, and then another 10k in stock options a year. I'll call that a quality retirement option...

Best part is it's all tax deferred.. hold the stock for a year and then sell then pay a much lower tax rate then the DSP cash is taxed at. And it's also in our name. Win win
I’ll all for stock options. If done right, it’s a great way to build and diversify wealth. Granted there’s a risk, but there’s a risk in everything. We’re going to ask for bigger DC contributions only to see them cut in the next recession.
Reply
Old 07-16-2019 | 03:35 PM
  #58  
Der Meister's Avatar
Line Holder
15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 941
Likes: 30
From: 320A
Default

Originally Posted by flyboy2181
I’ll all for stock options. If done right, it’s a great way to build and diversify wealth. Granted there’s a risk, but there’s a risk in everything. We’re going to ask for bigger DC contributions only to see them cut in the next recession.
The way I see it if stock options are good for upper management then they are good for us. You could base it of longevity, and do a true up for the guys that have been here longer. While it might not equate to the 60% retirement it would be light years better then anything I have seen the union propos as of yet. And then for us newer guys we would get x amount each year on longevity.

Look at the late Steve jobs from apple yearly income $1... stock options a few million.... talk about a huge tax break...
Reply
Old 07-16-2019 | 04:41 PM
  #59  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 887
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Flat out stock awards maybe. Why would you want a vesting schedule and an option price? It worked for the merger.
Reply
Old 07-16-2019 | 04:46 PM
  #60  
Der Meister's Avatar
Line Holder
15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 941
Likes: 30
From: 320A
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Flat out stock awards maybe. Why would you want a vesting schedule and an option price? It worked for the merger.
I'm not say a vesting schedule at all I was just saying at x years you get x amount of stock. So say just like our current vacation policy. Years 1-5 you get 5k, 5-10 you get 8.5k ect... and you get that amount each year. As to the exact amount for x longevity that would have to be negotiated. My example above is just that an example. I not saying that's how much we should get or at what rate of longevity.

Also mind you this would be above the max company 401k limit. So lump sum company contribution each year for each pilot then an additional stock amount for each year of longevity.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
Pinchanickled
Regional
33
12-17-2010 06:58 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
113
11-07-2010 01:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices