S3A
08-18-2019 | 02:54 PM
#21
Banned
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
It's not the Endeavor employee's fault the retiree's peers gave up the scope up allow them to exist in the first place. Maybe it's a little just deserts for them?
08-18-2019 | 02:55 PM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
So explain to me why a Delta employee is S3 on an ENDEAVOR flight meanwhile an ENDEAVOR employee is also S3. If we want to go with your idea, Delta employees should be below Endeavor employees on their airplanes. What do you think about that? Oh I get it, because those airplanes are owned by DELTA. Is it starting to make a little more sense?
08-18-2019 | 02:56 PM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 281
From: Sitting SC at the Five Towns
How many "okay, but what abouts" do you have to use to differentiate your own importance from Endeavor?
It's not the Endeavor employee's fault the retiree's peers gave up the scope up allow them to exist in the first place. Maybe it's a little just deserts for them?
It's not the Endeavor employee's fault the retiree's peers gave up the scope up allow them to exist in the first place. Maybe it's a little just deserts for them?
08-18-2019 | 02:57 PM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 281
From: Sitting SC at the Five Towns
So explain to me why a Delta employee is S3 on an ENDEAVOR flight meanwhile an ENDEAVOR employee is also S3. If we want to go with your idea, Delta employees should be below Endeavor employees on their airplanes. What do you think about that? Oh I get it, because those airplanes are owned by DELTA. Is it starting to make a little more sense?
08-18-2019 | 02:59 PM
#26
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
08-18-2019 | 03:07 PM
#29
On Guard!
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
So an employee of a company should go ahead of a retiree?
Therefore a Endeavor employee, who only operates aircraft owned by Delta Air Lines should go ahead of a retiree who is not an active employee?
I think we agree here. It's almost like they came up with a system to put the subsidiary employee ahead of a retiree while maintaining the integrity of all the active employees yet giving the retirees a continued benefit for free.
Every thought about pursuing important things like the outstanding JV scope violations that are actually hurting you?
Therefore a Endeavor employee, who only operates aircraft owned by Delta Air Lines should go ahead of a retiree who is not an active employee?
I think we agree here. It's almost like they came up with a system to put the subsidiary employee ahead of a retiree while maintaining the integrity of all the active employees yet giving the retirees a continued benefit for free.
Every thought about pursuing important things like the outstanding JV scope violations that are actually hurting you?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
