S3A
#31
#32
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
If added into your contract, it would only be for retired pilots.
#33
True but mainline is not their metal. Let me ask you this: Should compass, GoJet, Republic, and Skywest all go ahead of our retirees for vacation travel? Or just you guys? Our retirees gave a lot for this profession.
#34
Banned
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Gave a lot, like scope? Haha. Sorry. I couldn't help myself.
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 15
From: Hoping for any position
Based on the arguments, yes, they are active employees.
#37
On Reserve
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 137
Likes: 2
Yes they did, which is why Delta still gives them the ability to travel the world for free.
#38
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 934
Likes: 59
From: NBC
Totally don’t buy the “Endeavor employee NON-REVVING to work” argument. In that case, an Endeavor employee non-revving to WORK should have priority over an S2, right?
The jumpseat is for commuting. Non-reving is a benefit of employment (active or retired). Not eligible for the jumpseat? Then commuting to work at Endeavor is dicey career choice. Got bumped from the jumpseat? Commuter clause.
Endeavor is a wholly owned. They are not Delta employees. Their benefits should not undermine Delta employee benefits (active or retired).
I’m almost convinced this is a false flag move to force us to expend negotiating capital on a benefit we already had.
Signed,
Former ASA Mainline Pilot
The jumpseat is for commuting. Non-reving is a benefit of employment (active or retired). Not eligible for the jumpseat? Then commuting to work at Endeavor is dicey career choice. Got bumped from the jumpseat? Commuter clause.
Endeavor is a wholly owned. They are not Delta employees. Their benefits should not undermine Delta employee benefits (active or retired).
I’m almost convinced this is a false flag move to force us to expend negotiating capital on a benefit we already had.
Signed,
Former ASA Mainline Pilot
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 15
From: Hoping for any position
Totally don’t buy the “Endeavor employee NON-REVVING to work” argument. In that case, an Endeavor employee non-revving to WORK should have priority over an S2, right?
The jumpseat is for commuting. Non-reving is a benefit of employment (active or retired). Not eligible for the jumpseat? Then commuting to work at Endeavor is dicey career choice. Got bumped from the jumpseat? Commuter clause.
Endeavor is a wholly owned. They are not Delta employees. Their benefits should not undermine Delta employee benefits (active or retired).
I’m almost convinced this is a false flag move to force us to expend negotiating capital on a benefit we already had.
The jumpseat is for commuting. Non-reving is a benefit of employment (active or retired). Not eligible for the jumpseat? Then commuting to work at Endeavor is dicey career choice. Got bumped from the jumpseat? Commuter clause.
Endeavor is a wholly owned. They are not Delta employees. Their benefits should not undermine Delta employee benefits (active or retired).
I’m almost convinced this is a false flag move to force us to expend negotiating capital on a benefit we already had.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Totally don’t buy the “Endeavor employee NON-REVVING to work” argument. In that case, an Endeavor employee non-revving to WORK should have priority over an S2, right?
The jumpseat is for commuting. Non-reving is a benefit of employment (active or retired). Not eligible for the jumpseat? Then commuting to work at Endeavor is dicey career choice. Got bumped from the jumpseat? Commuter clause.
The jumpseat is for commuting. Non-reving is a benefit of employment (active or retired). Not eligible for the jumpseat? Then commuting to work at Endeavor is dicey career choice. Got bumped from the jumpseat? Commuter clause.

So only 1-2 people per flight can commute to work? lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



