Jan. AE

Reply Subscribe

Page 33 of 75

« First

Last »

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

01-18-2020 | 11:48 AM

#321

dbrownie

Line Holder

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 513

Likes: 20

From: NYC 330

Quote:

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1

Pay banding or seniority based pay is the smart choice. But there's so much push back from pilots here I doubt it'll ever happen. Also, why do we get international pay? It's not any harder than a 5 leg 717 day.

It’s not harder but it is more expensive.

01-18-2020 | 11:57 AM

#322

crewdawg

Moderator

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 7,415

Likes: 413

Quote:

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1

I don't disagree with you about the pushback on banding/longevity. Wrt to international pay...why do big planes pay more? Why do we get per diem? I guess becuase that's the way it's always been done. Though, I'm definitely not going to argue against a form of more pay.

01-18-2020 | 12:22 PM

#323

forgot to bid

veut gagner à la loterie

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 23,286

Likes: 0

From: Light Chop

Quote:

Originally Posted by crewdawg

How far into europe can a 321NEO get from BOS or JFK? Maybe just a much larger international pay?

01-18-2020 | 01:13 PM

#324

RockyBoy

Doesn't Get Weekends Off

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 2,599

Likes: 2

Quote:

Originally Posted by forgot to bid

UAL and JetBlue both have this model ordered. Can’t imagine we won’t do the same. ER rates need to be the minimum for the NEO.

01-18-2020 | 01:28 PM

#325

marcal

Line Holder

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 1,383

Likes: 121

Quote:

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1

International pilots already take on currency risk via per diem being paid in US Dollars. This at the very least helps mitigate some of that risk. Most international airlines pay their crews per diem or allowances in the local currency in which they are laying over. Why should crewmembers take currency risk? They should not.

01-18-2020 | 01:29 PM

#326

4fans

Line Holder

Joined: Feb 2011

Posts: 806

Likes: 6

If the 321 neo starts taking over 757 routes it makes me wonder what the 7er bid package will start to look like. Especially in Atlanta where they seem to be sending them all and adding to the category.

01-18-2020 | 02:43 PM

#327

crewdawg

Moderator

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 7,415

Likes: 413

Quote:

Originally Posted by forgot to bid

Well, on the plus side, we may start flying to the 'burgs and 'villes in Europe again.

01-18-2020 | 03:27 PM

#328

Express pilot

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 762

Likes: 0

Can the 350 fly SYD out of LAX or they going to DH ATL777 to fly SYD?

any idea of the trips the 330 would fly out of SLC?

01-18-2020 | 03:50 PM

#329

TurbineDriver

Line Holder

Joined: Mar 2012

Posts: 458

Likes: 1

From: 320B

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockyBoy

First 5 cities to HNL in the NEO are planned to be LAX, SFO, PDX, SEA, and SLC. Have also heard we will eventually do HNL from every city that Alaska and Southwest have service. That’s lots of cities to HNL.

source?? I sure hope this is true!

01-18-2020 | 04:16 PM

#330

saturn

Line Holder

Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 1,147

Likes: 41

From: Supreme Allied Commander

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockyBoy

UAL and JetBlue both have this model ordered. Can’t imagine we won’t do the same. ER rates need to be the minimum for the NEO.

AA also ordered 50 of the 321XLR. Miami-South America, PHL/JFK/BOS?-TATL.

For what it's worth, Glen Hauenstein said in a investor call recently that he wasn't seeing the 321XLR for our TATL network. He explained his doubts that it's the solution, mentioned pilot wages being a factor, and reiterated the desire for a NMA solution. I'm assuming by wages, he means its affect on CASM.