‘moad’ 2020
05-14-2020 | 12:48 PM
#161
Lineholder
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: Death by Powerpoint
[QUOTE=msprj2;3055938]
The difference is that if the furlough is deep enough to furlough “VP of flight ops RG”, then every 76 seat jet must be turned into a 70 seat jet to remain scope compliant (so long as DALPA can enforce that provision). So it doesn’t matter if it’s a 175SC or a 175, if RG is furloughed they both should be reduced to 70 seat aircraft.
As too which 76 seat aircraft need to be parked because of the flow down language; DALPA will try and attach it to the “heavy” 175s, but the language points to the number of “76 seat jets”.
The difference is that if the furlough is deep enough to furlough “VP of flight ops RG”, then every 76 seat jet must be turned into a 70 seat jet to remain scope compliant (so long as DALPA can enforce that provision). So it doesn’t matter if it’s a 175SC or a 175, if RG is furloughed they both should be reduced to 70 seat aircraft.
As too which 76 seat aircraft need to be parked because of the flow down language; DALPA will try and attach it to the “heavy” 175s, but the language points to the number of “76 seat jets”.
05-14-2020 | 03:03 PM
#162
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
[QUOTE=web500sjc;3055946]
The difference is that if the furlough is deep enough to furlough “VP of flight ops RG”, then every 76 seat jet must be turned into a 70 seat jet to remain scope compliant (so long as DALPA can enforce that provision). So it doesn’t matter if it’s a 175SC or a 175, if RG is furloughed they both should be reduced to 70 seat aircraft.
As too which 76 seat aircraft need to be parked because of the flow down language; DALPA will try and attach it to the “heavy” 175s, but the language points to the number of “76 seat jets”.
Then if for some reason they can wiggle out of the weight issue for them, we should at least press for max certifiable seating. Make them recertify them. There can be no quarter for large RJ scope violations.
The difference is that if the furlough is deep enough to furlough “VP of flight ops RG”, then every 76 seat jet must be turned into a 70 seat jet to remain scope compliant (so long as DALPA can enforce that provision). So it doesn’t matter if it’s a 175SC or a 175, if RG is furloughed they both should be reduced to 70 seat aircraft.
As too which 76 seat aircraft need to be parked because of the flow down language; DALPA will try and attach it to the “heavy” 175s, but the language points to the number of “76 seat jets”.
05-14-2020 | 04:17 PM
#165
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 177
05-14-2020 | 05:16 PM
#166
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,543
Likes: 509
05-14-2020 | 05:22 PM
#167
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
05-14-2020 | 05:31 PM
#168
seeing the country...
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,004
Likes: 36
From: 73N A
05-14-2020 | 05:42 PM
#169
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,543
Likes: 509
Many will bid to the 350. Some commuters may go to SEA 330. The LAX 777 closure was expected for quite some time, so most have been considering displacement plans for a while. A few of the Bs will displace to the left seat of ???
05-14-2020 | 05:44 PM
#170
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 0
From: Power top
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
