Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
35 Large RJs coming back? >

35 Large RJs coming back?

Search
Notices

35 Large RJs coming back?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2021, 09:41 AM
  #521  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,987
Default

If Delta wants to start a flow at 9E or anywhere, I have no problem with that at all. It doesn't make any difference to me where Delta new hires come from. BUT the 35 RJs are good leverage for DALPA to have. Let's see what we're offered. I'd be most happy with a flow AND keeping those 35 RJs parked...but that's probably a pipe dream.
m3113n1a1 is offline  
Old 05-20-2021, 09:55 AM
  #522  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 309
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1 View Post
If Delta wants to start a flow at 9E or anywhere, I have no problem with that at all. It doesn't make any difference to me where Delta new hires come from. BUT the 35 RJs are good leverage for DALPA to have. Let's see what we're offered. I'd be most happy with a flow AND keeping those 35 RJs parked...but that's probably a pipe dream.

​​​​​​That may be possible, because I don't know of anything in the language of the flow we're being offered that makes any reference to the 35 RJs. On our end the only thing I know it's tied to is an extension of our current contract. I could see an arbiter saying that the 35RJs have to stay parked, but the flow as offered to us is not within the dispute before the arbiter. We'll see...
flyingfiddler is offline  
Old 05-20-2021, 10:14 AM
  #523  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
Posts: 1,982
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1 View Post
If Delta wants to start a flow at 9E or anywhere, I have no problem with that at all. It doesn't make any difference to me where Delta new hires come from. BUT the 35 RJs are good leverage for DALPA to have. Let's see what we're offered. I'd be most happy with a flow AND keeping those 35 RJs parked...but that's probably a pipe dream.
Agreed. None of my business how/where delta gets new hires.

LOA 9 died with Compass. MEC letter pretty well summed it up.

If they want the 35 back, they need to pay dearly for it.
Drum is offline  
Old 05-20-2021, 03:31 PM
  #524  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,033
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano View Post
Do you really think that flying 10 knots below the placard speed is not inefficient? What’s the point? Do you really think a 737 is going to fall out of the sky because you don’t have Flaps 5 in the terminal environment? I routinely wait until 10 knots above the min speed before selecting the next flap setting. All it takes is a gust to put you into the clacker. And a flap overspeed is a lot bigger deal than exceeding Mmo in cruise.

As far as the WDR analysis is concerned, I’m onboard with independent and silent analysis. And since you raised the issue I’m happy to see the fleet leadership has toned down the “dwell time,” admonishments and emphasized slow and careful analysis prior to taxi — as evidenced in a recent fleet newsletter.
FYI I have had to pull over and redo the numbers twice now for 0 TW limited when ATL is reporting 050@2 right as we pull onto the runway. Low tail wind numbers now for the weight issue will bite you.
notEnuf is online now  
Old 05-20-2021, 04:01 PM
  #525  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 1,793
Default

Originally Posted by block30 View Post
I realize what the 9E pilots did or did not want matters not to upper management.

I sort of wonder about 9E ALPA pushing for flow up, and where were they in DL pilots' moment of need when, some three thousand of us were initially projected to go to the street? (Then ultimately became nearly 2,000).


I just think it's poopy and further illustrates this does nothing for current DL pilots (as far as I can tell).

And-again-I think agreements should not be one sided.

There is no need for me to search my feelings if there is nothing objective gained in this "agreement."
Our mec chairman actually said in an all pilot call something to the effect of, we would be open to helping furloughed delta pilots with a soft landing or flow down but it would have to be the right circumstances and we would have to get proportional improvements on our end. We were not opposed at the mec level to this. If I remember correctly that stupid apc survey got started right after that call because it came up.

He did not say, and it did not sound like, we were approached about that. But that's speculation
Casualinterest is offline  
Old 05-20-2021, 04:04 PM
  #526  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CGfalconHerc's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: DAL A320 CA
Posts: 558
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf View Post
FYI I have had to pull over and redo the numbers twice now for 0 TW limited when ATL is reporting 050@2 right as we pull onto the runway. Low tail wind numbers now for the weight issue will bite you.
I think as long as the WDR template has at least a 5 knot headwind component based on input from Ops, all of the data will show TW00. If you request a new TOPR with less favorable winds, you'll get more accurate TW options. Seemed to work on my last trip, but just gouge.. good luck!

CG

Last edited by CGfalconHerc; 05-20-2021 at 04:18 PM.
CGfalconHerc is online now  
Old 05-20-2021, 04:18 PM
  #527  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,033
Default

Originally Posted by CGfalconHerc View Post
I think as long as the WDR template has at least a 5 knot headwind component based on input from Ops, all of the data will show TW00. If you request a new TOPR with less favorable winds, you'll get more accurate TW options. JMHO...CG
You will need new numbers and all the procedural verification and checklists. ATL assumes we can always take a 10 knot tailwind so as they clear you into position or for takeoff they give you a wind report if it’s a tailwind (requirement for ATC) and you better have your ears on and x wind calculator handy. 0 tailwind allowed is exactly what it says. Check your WDR TW column and listen up. 3 of 4 flights today were 0TW for me.
notEnuf is online now  
Old 05-20-2021, 04:25 PM
  #528  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf View Post
You will need new numbers and all the procedural verification and checklists. ATL assumes we can always take a 10 knot tailwind so as they clear you into position or for takeoff they give you a wind report if it’s a tailwind (requirement for ATC) and you better have your ears on and x wind calculator handy. 0 tailwind allowed is exactly what it says. Check your WDR TW column and listen up. 3 of 4 flights today were 0TW for me.
Is this a problem? It's not really anything new. Any TW listed on the WDR has always been a limit as has a HW (required for TO)
JamesBond is offline  
Old 05-20-2021, 04:34 PM
  #529  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CGfalconHerc's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: DAL A320 CA
Posts: 558
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf View Post
You will need new numbers and all the procedural verification and checklists. ATL assumes we can always take a 10 knot tailwind so as they clear you into position or for takeoff they give you a wind report if it’s a tailwind (requirement for ATC) and you better have your ears on and x wind calculator handy. 0 tailwind allowed is exactly what it says. Check your WDR TW column and listen up. 3 of 4 flights today were 0TW for me.
Got it...I'm just saying if winds are light and inconsistent, a TOPR with a direct 10 kt tailwind should give you limiting weights up to a 10 kt tail..if available..then you'll be covered at the runway if tower gives you less favorable winds than when you got the original WDR with TW00 for every thrust setting. Again, just gouge, and a definite pain..ymmv. CG

Last edited by CGfalconHerc; 05-20-2021 at 04:45 PM.
CGfalconHerc is online now  
Old 05-21-2021, 05:06 AM
  #530  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,033
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond View Post
Is this a problem? It's not really anything new. Any TW listed on the WDR has always been a limit as has a HW (required for TO)
10 TW was the norm or at least high enough to exceed any tail component. The new procedure only gives you 5 knots max and many times 0.
notEnuf is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ayecarumba
Pilot Health
7
03-27-2013 03:45 PM
EdwardNorth
Career Questions
4
09-27-2011 01:58 AM
1morguy
Major
20
12-05-2007 10:20 AM
joel payne
Hangar Talk
4
04-27-2007 04:49 PM
Turbinebound
Regional
20
02-22-2007 03:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices