Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2 >

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest about Delta?" Part 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2026 | 08:47 PM
  #11731  
PilotJ3's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,845
Likes: 92
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
counterpoint, we flew approximately the same number of block hours in 2025 as we did in 2019 with almost 3,000 more pilots. When it takes 12 minutes to move to the next pilot, and there are dozens of pilots who have no intention of actually flying said slip, and you must do that before using reserves to cover the trip, no amount of staffing will solve that.

im not saying we give this up for nothing, but 2 step trip coverage + WS before reserves absolutely creates a problem no level of staffing would solve.
Considering 2019 was a S…Show, we were probably 1500-2000 pilots short that year. Remember at the end of the year “we are never going to do that again”???
Reply
Old 03-08-2026 | 03:50 AM
  #11732  
Viper25's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 284
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
counterpoint, we flew approximately the same number of block hours in 2025 as we did in 2019 with almost 3,000 more pilots. When it takes 12 minutes to move to the next pilot, and there are dozens of pilots who have no intention of actually flying said slip, and you must do that before using reserves to cover the trip, no amount of staffing will solve that.

im not saying we give this up for nothing, but 2 step trip coverage + WS before reserves absolutely creates a problem no level of staffing would solve.
WS before reserves is huge for both line holders and reserves. No way should that be changed.
Reply
Old 03-08-2026 | 06:13 AM
  #11733  
Abouttime2fish's Avatar
Line Holder
Veteran: Marine Corp
10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 161
From: MD88
Default

Originally Posted by PilotJ3
Considering 2019 was a S…Show, we were probably 1500-2000 pilots short that year. Remember at the end of the year “we are never going to do that again”???
The difference being the pilot group was willing to get ‘er done for premium pay. Then flight ops destroyed the delta difference.

What’s a SIL
the optimizer
LCA trip releases
PB days
reliability letters
sick call witch hunts
And more….

Focus of effort…. Everyone at an airline works to support the pilots. We are the focus of effort. Without pilots, nothing happens. Until they realize that again, the airline will continue to slowly circle…

And before those of you that don’t understand focus of effort get all ****y, go look it up. 20 years as a USMC pilot, how often where we the focus of effort? Exactly zero. Doesn’t mean your job isn’t important, just identifies a potential singular point of failure.
Reply
Old 03-08-2026 | 07:42 AM
  #11734  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 306
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
counterpoint, we flew approximately the same number of block hours in 2025 as we did in 2019 with almost 3,000 more pilots. When it takes 12 minutes to move to the next pilot, and there are dozens of pilots who have no intention of actually flying said slip, and you must do that before using reserves to cover the trip, no amount of staffing will solve that.

im not saying we give this up for nothing, but 2 step trip coverage + WS before reserves absolutely creates a problem no level of staffing would solve.
I can see a viewpoint that blames auto-accept for 23M7 usage, but now that QS are a thing, I don't see how auto-accept can be blamed when there are NO TAKERS for a QS.

Literally any eligible pilot with a QS in can raise their hand for a QS trip. When nobody does, auto-accept had nothing to do with it.

If anything, QS are shining a bright light on the fact that auto-accept was never the fundamental problem.
Reply
Old 03-08-2026 | 07:49 AM
  #11735  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 2,235
Likes: 352
Default

Originally Posted by Verdell
I can see a viewpoint that blames auto-accept for 23M7 usage, but now that QS are a thing, I don't see how auto-accept can be blamed when there are NO TAKERS for a QS.

Literally any eligible pilot with a QS in can raise their hand for a QS trip. When nobody does, auto-accept had nothing to do with it.

If anything, QS are shining a bright light on the fact that auto-accept was never the fundamental problem.
with respect, i think its too early to tell. The qs that have been going out have been low time. I declined trying to hold out.

auto accept is definitely a core part of poor trip coverage imo.

however: since the company stole money from the pb process…..for the first time in a decade of service, im ……… not enthusiastic
Reply
Old 03-08-2026 | 07:50 AM
  #11736  
Abouttime2fish's Avatar
Line Holder
Veteran: Marine Corp
10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 161
From: MD88
Default

Originally Posted by Verdell
I can see a viewpoint that blames auto-accept for 23M7 usage, but now that QS are a thing, I don't see how auto-accept can be blamed when there are NO TAKERS for a QS.

Literally any eligible pilot with a QS in can raise their hand for a QS trip. When nobody does, auto-accept had nothing to do with it.

If anything, QS are shining a bright light on the fact that auto-accept was never the fundamental problem.
ATL 73NA…. They’ve covered 1 and only 1 trip since the 0700 PCS run. And that was P coded. I’ll save you looking it up 😁. 23k greater than original.
Reply
Old 03-08-2026 | 07:54 AM
  #11737  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 316
Default

Originally Posted by Verdell
I can see a viewpoint that blames auto-accept for 23M7 usage, but now that QS are a thing, I don't see how auto-accept can be blamed when there are NO TAKERS for a QS.

Literally any eligible pilot with a QS in can raise their hand for a QS trip. When nobody does, auto-accept had nothing to do with it.

If anything, QS are shining a bright light on the fact that auto-accept was never the fundamental problem.
Auto accept is a problem. Not enough trained schedulers is another enormous problems. They probably need to triple or quadruple the size of the scheduling department. It’s just stupid at this point.
Reply
Old 03-08-2026 | 07:59 AM
  #11738  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 51
Likes: 37
Default

The average time a trip sat in open time before CS starts coverage for the year is 18 minutes according to the ALPA pod cast. It is taking 8-12 hours to make its way through the WS steps due to auto accept if not longer. This is from alpa not the company. This is not sustainable. We can argue all we want about how we got here and whose fault it is but we are here. Both sides need to fix it.
Reply
Old 03-08-2026 | 08:15 AM
  #11739  
Line Holder
25M+ Airline Miles
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 890
Likes: 238
Default

I'd be willing to talk about solutions during section 6 in exchange for them restoring the traditional method of handling PB days.
Reply
Old 03-08-2026 | 08:26 AM
  #11740  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 1,079
Default

Originally Posted by PowderPilot2016
The average time a trip sat in open time before CS starts coverage for the year is 18 minutes according to the ALPA pod cast. It is taking 8-12 hours to make its way through the WS steps due to auto accept if not longer. This is from alpa not the company. This is not sustainable. We can argue all we want about how we got here and whose fault it is but we are here. Both sides need to fix it.
It’s perplexing that anyone is still saying “both sides need to fix it”, especially in light of management’s recent attack on PB days.

This is solely management’s problem to fix. Either they open their wallets enough to fix it in section 6, or status quo prevails and they continue paying 300%+ for coverage. Either way, it’s not the pilot group’s problem — particularly with QS.

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boog123
Delta
6
07-14-2016 11:26 AM
iahflyr
Major
27
09-30-2014 09:04 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices