Search

Notices

Retro Pay Resolution

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2022 | 09:48 AM
  #141  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,223
Likes: 670
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by Scooter432
Yes, retro is emotional. By my numbers on my earnings I’m due close to 100k.

Just raising the question here, before I get trampled on. Do we expect the company to pay out 1.5B in retro on top of contract by all estimates will be 2B or so? I think we need to get realistic here. Yes, retro holds the company accountable for dragging this out, but if folks think they are all going to be getting 100-150k checks plus rates from mid 20s/30% (on top of contractual gains) are going to be very disappointed.

In light of the impending economic environment that could get ugly fast , turning down a solid win contract over retro will cost us in the long run. Saying it here now on record. At some point time value money ( can’t believe I’m saying a Moak term) does come into effect.

We need to see the whole contract holistically and see how much the bonus/retro ends up being under that lens.
3.5 billion by your numbers for improvements delayed 3 years, 1.2B per year of PWA. That’s reasonable. Plus escalator raises of course. And acceptable QOL and SCOPE improvements.
Reply
Old 10-26-2022 | 09:51 AM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,128
Likes: 91
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
If only we had opened for near the numbers many are now claiming as reasonable. We would not need retro because we likely would have completed the deal. What about DC retro?
The company had twice as many section 23 change proposals as we did…and our negotiators were following the lead of their constituents who have stated they wanted a comprehensive PWA scrub this round.

I know you honestly think we could have reached a quick deal with the company’s junior varsity negotiators in 2019 because you say it so frequently. But I am honestly curious if you have ever spoken with another human being who thinks the company would have signed an expeditious deal that pilots would have ratified?
Reply
Old 10-26-2022 | 09:54 AM
  #143  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,128
Likes: 91
Default

Originally Posted by Scooter432

Just raising the question here, before I get trampled on. Do we expect the company to pay out 1.5B in retro on top of contract by all estimates will be 2B or so?
Yes.

filler
Reply
Old 10-26-2022 | 09:57 AM
  #144  
Line Holder
10 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 921
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by interceptorpilo
I won’t be unhappy. I fully expect to be brought an AIP that falls well short or we just get parked. Either way it is part of the process. Drawing this out will get worse and worse for Delta.
Serious question, drawing it out is worse for whom? The company or the pilots?
Reply
Old 10-26-2022 | 09:59 AM
  #145  
Line Holder
10 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 921
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
3.5 billion by your numbers for improvements delayed 3 years 1.2B per year of PWA. That’s reasonable. Plus escalator raises of course. BTW those pay % increases were completely affordable for FAs.
Sweet! Another no vote.
Reply
Old 10-26-2022 | 10:05 AM
  #146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 187
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
The company had twice as many section 23 change proposals as we did…and our negotiators were following the lead of their constituents who have stated they wanted a comprehensive PWA scrub this round.

I know you honestly think we could have reached a quick deal with the company’s junior varsity negotiators in 2019 because you say it so frequently. But I am honestly curious if you have ever spoken with another human being who thinks the company would have signed an expeditious deal that pilots would have ratified?
The MEC set the expectations. Had they started with setting reasonable expectations and stated why they were reasonable yes I think a ratifiable contract by the amendable date was possible. I posted back when our conceptually opener was published it meant we were not going to see a TA for many years and when we did it would be for what we could have had upfront anyway. Turns out it’s going to be worse than that. Expectations sure have dropped like a stone in the last 6 months. I once posted I expected about 1 billion a year in contractual improvements. Looks like we will be lucky to get even that and will have lost a entire 3 year contract cycle. What a disaster for the pilot group going forward.
Reply
Old 10-26-2022 | 10:17 AM
  #147  
JamesBond's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
the mec set the expectations. Had they started with setting reasonable expectations and stated why they were reasonable yes i think a ratifiable contract by the amendable date was possible. I posted back when our conceptually opener was published it meant we were not going to see a ta for many years and when we did it would be for what we could have had upfront anyway. Turns out it’s going to be worse than that. Expectations sure have dropped like a stone in the last 6 months. I once posted i expected about 1 billion a year in contractual improvements. Looks like we will be lucky to get even that and will have lost a entire 3 year contract cycle. What a disaster for the pilot group going forward.
incoming!!!!!!
Reply
Old 10-26-2022 | 10:20 AM
  #148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 187
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond
incoming!!!!!!
The truth hurts. When you ignore even what the professionals you hire tell you is plausible a good result is not likely.
Reply
Old 10-26-2022 | 10:42 AM
  #149  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,223
Likes: 670
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The truth hurts. When you ignore even what the professionals you hire tell you is plausible a good result is not likely.
The opener was conceptual. Just recently have we started discussing real $. Management has stalled internationally.
Reply
Old 10-26-2022 | 10:59 AM
  #150  
Starcheck102's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: ATL 330 A
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
The opener was conceptual. Just recently have we started discussing real $. Management has stalled internationally.
The Opener wasn’t costed by ALPA EF&A; our full table position and its attendant costs were unknown until the end of the Protocol Agreement in December of 2019. In the meantime, Bastian said “no early deals” while Schnitzler said “time is on our side.” Jim Graham took one look at the price tag, was immediately certain that he had nothing to fear from the NMB, and here we are almost three years later.

I think we’re gonna get parked in January.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gzsg
Delta
138
10-08-2022 05:50 AM
Clearedtopush
Delta
241
07-27-2016 06:10 PM
Albief15
FedEx
161
10-02-2015 03:11 PM
CAL EWR
United
44
11-26-2012 01:29 PM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices