MOU 25-05
#421
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
If they would have some sort of sick time cash out at the end of the year it would probably cut down on 75% of fraudulent sick calls. Like maybe 50% of your total bank or something. It would still give guys enough time to call off for actually being sick without pressuring guys monetarily to fly sick
#422
On Reserve
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 56
Likes: 12
If they would have some sort of sick time cash out at the end of the year it would probably cut down on 75% of fraudulent sick calls. Like maybe 50% of your total bank or something. It would still give guys enough time to call off for actually being sick without pressuring guys monetarily to fly sick
#423
I would say yes. Since a GFB is not allowed to be triggered solely based on frequency or duration of occurrences, in practice this meant CPOs were using them when people were calling out sick next to vacation days, APDs, holidays, etc. These instances often happen to be the most innopportune time to try to get a sick note. Say, on a vacation in a remote/foreign area, maybe with spotty or zero wifi or over the holidays when places are closed. Admittedly, this MOU radically improves some of the logistical issues with GFB, but for extensive travellers like myself who make full use of the flight benefits, I've been in many sick situations where I was praying a GFB wouldn't happen and I can see that still being the case now. And if this example is too niche, I will posit that the biggest issue of all is just being hassled to get one while ill. It's the last thing I'd want to be doing while sick. Third, CPOs were using GFBs at different rates. It is well known (or at least was) that if you are a NYC based pilot the likelihood of getting a GFB was higher, and the implication was that the more junior and probationary folk of our ranks were going to be easy targets of harassment. I don't think this is right. And regarding just the regular 120hr verification, a lot of my points above still stand, although to a lesser degree.
With so many online options, it's just not that hard to get a note. My Dr scheduled me within a day for a telehealth visit over the holiday season. Is it a pain and a bit ridiculous, yes, but worth switching to an accumulation model over, absolutely not. Not for something that you MAY have to do a few times in a 30-40 year career. Some seem to be making the GFB a much bigger boogeyman than reality.
As far as the standard sick lookback requirements, if you're out enough to trigger that, you're likely already going to the Dr. In that case, a note isn't hard to get. Half the time the Dr asks if I need a work note before I even ask.
I say all this as someone who used to be adamantly against the note idea. But the more I see other models, the less it bothers me. When you have the ability to call in sick, potentially up to 150 hours without a note, or up to 4 months of the year, I just don't see it as a bridge too far to get a note. Would it be great if they went away, sure. But I can't see blowing capital on it when it's such a rare occurrence in the grand scheme of things.
#424
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 12
#425
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 87
From: Road construction signholder
If they would have some sort of sick time cash out at the end of the year it would probably cut down on 75% of fraudulent sick calls. Like maybe 50% of your total bank or something. It would still give guys enough time to call off for actually being sick without pressuring guys monetarily to fly sick
There are two types of sick leave systems out there. Delta's which gives us a generous annual allotment, but of course doesn't carry over, followed by a new allotment every June 1, and everyone else's, which gives you a much smaller allotment each year, but also allows a carryover.
I think in the grand scheme of things, the total costs to the companies is a wash. Depending on the individual pilot, and countless factors over the course of a hopefully long career, one system will be better than the other--and the opposite will hold true for others.
But we don't get our system, AND get some sort of carryover as well. The best we can do (and that is only since two contract cycles ago) is the Enhanced Disability Bank. That is a very, VERY slow method of accruing extra sick leave hours (sort of) as a secondary "reward" for having low sick leave usage years. The problem with it is that if you retire with a positive balance there, all you get is a pat on the back. I would like to see some way of converting those hours to pay, extra vacation days, or at least a payout at retirement! Our reps are aware.
#426
#427
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,363
Likes: 904
#428
If they would have some sort of sick time cash out at the end of the year it would probably cut down on 75% of fraudulent sick calls. Like maybe 50% of your total bank or something. It would still give guys enough time to call off for actually being sick without pressuring guys monetarily to fly sick
#429
#430
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 208
Likes: 12
If they would have some sort of sick time cash out at the end of the year it would probably cut down on 75% of fraudulent sick calls. Like maybe 50% of your total bank or something. It would still give guys enough time to call off for actually being sick without pressuring guys monetarily to fly sick
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



