![]() |
|
Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
(Post 1272694)
Which less effective MEC's? Never mind the old evil APA. Delivering results that are not reflective of the will of the pilot group flies in the face of a democratic organization. Gerrymandering the vote and process until you get the democratic result you desire is not leadership, nor lint picking. Fascism, communism, and feudalism have all delivered positive results at one point or another. I cannot speak to the current candidates, although joining the winning side and claiming the high road while not living up to previous campaign promises and rhetoric is not a desirable characteristic I want to see in a candidate.
94% turnout. 62%-38% Every single council in favor. This is gerrymadering? Really? It looks to me like your point of view lost a whole series of democratic elections.
Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
(Post 1272694)
Speaking to the current small field in C20 I have heard there will be some stealth candidates who are either going to write themselves in or have ballot stuffing at the nomination meeting. Kilowatts and Rhythm and Blues. Not what I want to see in a candidate either. If you are running, stand up and have the stones to announce and appeal to the whole LEC on your merits.
If the result doesn't come out the way you want, will it be gerrymandered?:p |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1272603)
...or maybe he planned his future around the concept that his union would look out for his (and not the company's) best interests? We won't make that mistake again. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1272702)
14-5
94% turnout. 62%-38% Every single council in favor. This is gerrymadering? Really? It looks to me like your point of view lost a whole series of democratic elections. I'd prefer everyone be up front to. Isn't this predicting a repeat of DTW last cycle? If the result doesn't come out the way you want, will it be gerrymandered?:p |
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
(Post 1272606)
That argument works both ways. The short time from fervent sales pitch and the company securing a huge productivity increase to the current tone/language coming from ALPA/management is instructive. And yet none of the preexisting conditions when the contract was voted on have really changed. Not only that but we spent some future retirements in the process. It's a sales job that was not honest and no two ways about it is leading to more stagnation for those trapped in the middle and at the bottom................Dude. Spin away. Doesn't matter what ALPA says, or what the company says. My instruction leads me to believe you would have voted no if we'd been given FDX+5%. Well within your right but its weird that the vocal minority still can't sell their idealism, isn't it? |
Originally Posted by SailorJerry
(Post 1272704)
Tough to collect a check when you and your union burn your company to the ground. American Airlines was recently ranked the most likely company to not exist at the end of 2013. Why? Because the pilots hated management and r they've ruined the brand.
|
Originally Posted by dragon
(Post 1272268)
Don't try arguing with them. They don't understand why we aren't happy to sit at the bottom of a never moving list and suck hind teat.
They got theirs and don't really care. |
Originally Posted by Bainite
(Post 1272281)
Is it better to be stuck at Captain for 14 years than narrow body FO for 14 years? Abso-freakin-lutely!
|
Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
(Post 1272707)
And management hating the pilots? Interesting as a union member you seem biased to blame the pilots. There is always more to the story.? So of course there's more to the story. I don't blame pilots for American's demise either. Not sure where you got that. They did all they could to make American viable, and when management there crossed the line, they'd had enough and they ground the operation to a halt. Good for them. Being a union member doesn't remove my ability to think critically for myself. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1272709)
So I'll ask you the same question that I asked dragon. What is it you want "us" to do about it?
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1272708)
That's not really true, but putting the vitriol aside for a moment, what exactly should "we" do about it?
I'll try to put down what I think would work, but will avoid a DYP offense and wait till the morning. Have enjoyed the OU game, the GT game not so much but loving the SC beat down of UGA. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:24 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands