![]() |
|
Originally Posted by TOGA LK
(Post 1350362)
Free up more 767s for Florida. ;)
|
Originally Posted by TOGA LK
(Post 1350264)
Anyone else find it odd that AA/US, Alaska and CAL/UAL are hiring and posting bids with upward movement and have wide bodies on order while we keep MDing into smaller equipment, leasing old vs purchasing new (refleeting long term )? I find it deeply troubling.
Alaska is a situation that does trouble me as well. I would much rather have organic growth on the west coast. Now I do agree it would be good to see forward movement and I will be concerned if I don't see a WB order in the next 18 months. But the grass may not be greener at the new AA or UCal |
Originally Posted by Dorfman
(Post 1350366)
This is not quite as rosy of a picture as you paint for AA/US and UCAL. Both AA and United have pilots on furlough and both mergers are going to have huge SLI issues. The Cal side is hiring off the street because the furloughed United guys won't take the jobs under the present terms.
Alaska is a situation that does trouble me as well. I would much rather have organic growth on the west coast. Now I do agree it would be good to see forward movement and I will be concerned if I don't see a WB order in the next 18 months. But the grass may not be greener at the new AA or UCal |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1349988)
Here is just one item where you are just lying again. The last two bids have had three times more pilots moving to higher paying positions than moved to lower paying positions. So your thesis is incorrect. 25% is more than 1%. Luckily the Delta pilots are too smart to fall for your simple word games.
Here's my post again for your review:
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1349865)
Talk about word games. Pay RATES may have gone up, but far too many of us are seeing those RATE gains neutralized by displacements. Displacements allowable by contract changes that allow us to do more flying with less pilots. I know you know this, so I wonder who you are trying to fool with this line of "reason".
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1349988)
In fact every base that had a rep vote no on this deal all voted in majority for it. These reps couldn't even convince their own pilots. That is how thin their arguments were.
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1349988)
If the Negotiating Committee violated the policy manual then name the section they violated. Or are you just repeating another set of lies? The process was followed, the MEC voted, and you are just playing sour grapes because you lost.
I don't want to clog up this thread again with you and I going at it. Take it to PM's if you have any more dishonorable BS to spread. Carl |
Originally Posted by Fly4hire
(Post 1350152)
PM sent. Time for a change up anyways :cool:
Carl |
Originally Posted by TOGA LK
(Post 1350285)
And a content locker on our personal iPad.
TEN |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1350166)
Alfa,
Would it be correct to state "the MEC voted in agreement, rendering any speculation with regard to noncompliance moot?" I would like to know your thoughts on ALPA National enabling Pinnacle to do a pilot contract with Delta management without even a "how do you do" to the Delta MEC. Do you agree with Bill Robert's redefinition of "Delta flying" to only that flying performed by Delta pilots currently? Are you aware his previous statements on the record were clear that Delta flying includes the flying we perform, as well as the flying we permit? Do you agree there is significance in that change in perception among our leadership? What is your opinion on "Delta flying" speaking only for yourself? I don't know anything about this other than the public press reports. I haven't spoken with anyone about this ever and I have no idea what anyone has said or didn't say, therefore I won't comment on speculation and hearsay, it is not fair to anyone involved. With great joy and relief, I am "out of the loop" and have no intention of getting back "in the loop". I don't know what the MEC is thinking or the MEC Administration, I have not spoken with anyone about this. The last time I saw anyone from the administration was at a football party and thankfully we did not talk about ALPA crap. It is someone else's turn to worry about this junk because I am done with it. I assume that the MEC will address this in detail at the next meeting (tomorrow) and perhaps your rep (or incoming rep) can give a detailed recap. |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1350403)
With great joy and relief, I am "out of the loop" and have no intention of getting back "in the loop".
I don't know what the MEC is thinking or the MEC Administration, I have not spoken with anyone about this. The last time I saw anyone from the administration was at a football party and thankfully we did not talk about ALPA crap. Yes, yes. We've got it. you are trying to separate yourself from all the failure you helped propagate. It becomes more and more apparent with each passing day that we got bamboozled on the contract. Why can't DALPA just admit we got our clocks cleaned? Rather than telling us how they plan to rectify it, they just continue the demagoguery and jedi mind tricks. The well is poisoned. We'll never achieve our earnings/lifestyle potential with DALPA (and its self-serving, self-preserving agenda) on the property. |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1350416)
Then why are you still here spewing DALPA talking points?
|
Originally Posted by TOGA LK
(Post 1350419)
He wants confirmation that he didn't contribute to further decline in the industry, despite all the indicators pointing that way.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:45 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands