Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
12-11-2013, 07:39 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 405
Originally Posted by slowplay
Total company retirement plan contributions as of January 1, 2014 are 15%. We currently have 2 separate plans (401K and DC) that are being merged into one (401k). No pilot contributions are required to get the 15%.
12-11-2013, 07:39 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 359
Originally Posted by tsquare
Irrelevant. Guys DO answer their phone, or their kids do... get grabbed in the jetway.... or whatever. Not all, but some. I see no difference in asking to fly a GS or accepting an IA when you KNOW it is skeds on the phone. It doesn't matter. You are pressuring one pilot to forego his contractual right while rewarding another for doing the same thing.
Not disagreeing with you at all. I can only tell you from a furloughed pilots perspective there is a difference. Thats why I proposed the 75 hour hard cap if I were king for a day. THoughts on that?
12-11-2013, 07:39 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Capt
Posts: 2,025
Originally Posted by cni187
I'm also curious: If 2.6billion pre tax
is it (10% of 2.5 Billion) + (20% of .1Billion)?
Or 20% of 2.6 Billion?
250 mil + 20 mil = 270 mil
or 520 million????
That's a big difference.
is it (10% of 2.5 Billion) + (20% of .1Billion)?
Or 20% of 2.6 Billion?
250 mil + 20 mil = 270 mil
or 520 million????
That's a big difference.
12-11-2013, 07:42 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 359
edit….due to Herkflyr post edit
12-11-2013, 07:42 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Originally Posted by fisherpilot
So how would that look for a new hire? Not premerger DAL or NWA
12-11-2013, 07:43 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,399
Originally Posted by Dorfman
The problem is GS is an option to fly, a right by the contract but optional none the less. IAs are not, if they get a hold of you, i.e. don't answer your phone.
12-11-2013, 07:44 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,399
Originally Posted by Dorfman
You missed my point. I think the contract should change, via memrat, to a hard cap with guys on furlough. Yes I said if I was king for a day but since that is as likely as Carl and Tsquare agreeing on union representation I think your safe.
12-11-2013, 07:52 AM
No longer cares
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Originally Posted by Dorfman
T
Not disagreeing with you at all. I can only tell you from a furloughed pilots perspective there is a difference. Thats why I proposed the 75 hour hard cap if I were king for a day. THoughts on that?
Not disagreeing with you at all. I can only tell you from a furloughed pilots perspective there is a difference. Thats why I proposed the 75 hour hard cap if I were king for a day. THoughts on that?
12-11-2013, 07:53 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 405
Originally Posted by slowplay
It would look like 15%.
12-11-2013, 07:56 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Posts: 1,898
Originally Posted by tsquare
There shouldn't be any difference in how you view it. I gu-ar-an-tee that guys will anxiously answer the phone when they see that skeds is calling with an IA. I'll give you another perspective to think about too. When the company furloughs, they know pretty well how long they will need to have guys out. Flying overtime, not flying overtime, doesn't appreciably affect it one way or the other. I would be willing to bet that they look at it from a worst case scenario, that being nobody flies overtime but that is just a guess on my part. As far as a hard cap... sure why not? I think it's mostly a feel good thing, but it wouldn't bother me...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
