![]() |
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1547157)
When I get called by scheduling to cover a trip, it's happened twice in the last month, the scheduler has alluded to the other pilot as not really being sick. So, my opinion is there is a bias, within scheduling, to assume sick calls are bogus. I think a bias like that is how bad metrics get generated and therefore why decisions on how to respond to/handle the problem are faulty from the start.
|
Holiday Pay, just like the other employees get, would solve all of Scheduling's coverage problems. There would be zero open time left to cover after the first PBS run, and there'd be guys lined up 5 deep to white slip anything that did come open over the holiday.
Every other employee group piggy backs on us when we get raises, I've never understood why that's only a one-way street, but it is. |
Originally Posted by DeadHead
(Post 1547151)
I think a lot of the angst is probably due to all the sick call verification/accusation talk on here lately. I'm doubtful that every pilot who calls in sick is a target, just as every pilot who calls in sick is being entirely honest. I have no idea what the final lack of crew cancellation count will be, but I'm sure the lack of coverage will carry over into the next few days and into New Years.
I'm curious to see what the company says about it in a few days, and I really hope that communication doesn't come across as accusatory towards the pilot group in any way. Management, as good as they are right now, needs to be a little more fluid in their approach with the pilot group going into next contract. Basically bank sick time, holiday pay, ability to green slip in advance on big holidays (or whenever scheduling will clearly run dry on reserves).....just a few ideas. If management plans on running an overally lean pilot staffing level then they will need to find other ways to get adequate coverage on certain holidays and/or summertime flying. Basically money talks, and sweetening the pot on busy days and de-incentivizing sick leave abuse are a better solution than not hiring while ignoring the problem. Just a few of my own thoughts. |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1547164)
Holiday Pay, just like the other employees get, would solve all of Scheduling's coverage problems. There would be zero open time left to cover after the first PBS run, and there'd be guys lined up 5 deep to white slip anything that did come open over the holiday.
Every other employee group piggy backs on us when we get raises, I've never understood why that's only a one-way street, but it is. There are always some things one group has that another does not. Overall however we do better then most of the other employees. As a example I don't know of any employees getting double pay for overtime. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1547162)
Certainly we have some bad schedulers. We also have some very good ones. Some have a bias and some don't. If you are ever in training and have some spare time go over to scheduling and ask to be shown around. If it's a bad weather day you might find it a eye opening experience. Listen to how some pilots treat the schedulers. The road runs both ways.
At some time after the merger, I don't know if it was RA/SD/Big Data/new schedulers/NW Schedulers/changes in management/potential abuse/the post-BK era, somehow the green light was given to an entirely different stance, and sarcasm and doubt were institutionalized. Many schedulers are still pros, some are not. Then again, it's pretty normal for people to act a little frustrated when given impossible tasks. If they're not given enough pilots for the flying... |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1547174)
Then again, it's pretty normal for people to act a little frustrated when given impossible tasks. If they're not given enough pilots for the flying...
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1547172)
As a example I don't know of any employees getting double pay for overtime.
|
Thanks
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1546638)
1 and 2 have the new HD visuals. Makes for much more pleasing to the eye impact into the mountains. :)
|
Another point that gets lost in the shuffle of staffing is our profitability. I think management is running the company like we are on the verge of bankruptcy. I appreciate a cost conscious management style but now it is affecting the operation and it will not be long before it affects our bottom line in loss of revenue. We do not need to spend money like drunken sailors but we need to adequately fund the operation to be able to deal with contingincies. I see it the same as upgrading jfk or adding lie flat seats to our planes. we must spend the money to upgrade the operation. We will never have this opportunity again in our lifetime where all three of our major competitors are merging. we should not spoil it by ****ing away our lead because we did not invest in our airline.
I |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1547157)
When I get called by scheduling to cover a trip, it's happened twice in the last month, the scheduler has alluded to the other pilot as not really being sick. So, my opinion is there is a bias, within scheduling, to assume sick calls are bogus. I think a bias like that is how bad metrics get generated and therefore why decisions on how to respond to/handle the problem are faulty from the start.
A) I bet every scheduler and 4th floor type could fly sick. I mean I could type on this computer all day long and be an ass on the internet even with the flu. In fact, I can take this computer to the bathroom if need be. B) And I bet every pilot here could fly with the flu too. But just because you can doesn't mean it's smart, wise, safe or the responsible thing to do. And if there is an incident and you were flying sick... C) if you do a 12 or 14 leg trip, you have the opportunity to get 1 other pilot, multiple flight attendants and possibly the 12 or 14 other pilots who flew after you to be sick. D) Earlier in the year I called in sick, I know the scheduler didn't believe me. I got better. Two weeks later I flew completely fine, clear sinuses and everything but nearly busted an ear drum on landing. It hit out of the blue and it hurt so bad. Took 3 weeks to get hearing back. I ended up going to the doctor and he was surprised it wasn't worse. E) The tolerance for our mistakes is low, our tolerance to fly even slightly sick should be just as low. F) We could be offered a chance to win a Ford Explorer with a perfect attendance record (Continental Airlines) but all you do is encourage people to fly sick. You could require verification for every sick call but you're encouraging people to fly sick. There needs to be a better way.
Originally Posted by DeadHead
(Post 1547151)
I think a lot of the angst is probably due to all the sick call verification/accusation talk on here lately. I'm doubtful that every pilot who calls in sick is a target, just as every pilot who calls in sick is being entirely honest. I have no idea what the final lack of crew cancellation count will be, but I'm sure the lack of coverage will carry over into the next few days and into New Years.
I'm curious to see what the company says about it in a few days, and I really hope that communication doesn't come across as accusatory towards the pilot group in any way. Management, as good as they are right now, needs to be a little more fluid in their approach with the pilot group going into next contract. Basically bank sick time, holiday pay, ability to green slip in advance on big holidays (or whenever scheduling will clearly run dry on reserves).....just a few ideas. If management plans on running an overally lean pilot staffing level then they will need to find other ways to get adequate coverage on certain holidays and/or summertime flying. Basically money talks, and sweetening the pot on busy days and de-incentivizing sick leave abuse are a better solution than not hiring while ignoring the problem. Just a few of my own thoughts. I have a question though, how many pilots are offline because of the 717 or other training? I held this week off but I am not qualified on the 717 yet and I'm not the only one I'm sure. I wonder how many? It had to be what killed the MD88 and why I'm starting to think they're not concerned that staffing is improper. :mad: |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:29 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands