![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Doug Masters
(Post 1570728)
When I was hired in '07 it was the highest social had the lowest seniority number (meaning high social=better seniority).
Seniority numbers will be assigned to individuals on the first day of their new-hire training in the following order: a.Company transferees will be assigned the lowest seniority numbers within the class, in order of their most recent date of employment with the Company, then b.New-hires will be assigned seniority numbers on the basis of the last four digits of each individual’s social security number. Individuals with the higher numbers will be assigned the lowest seniority numbers. Note: New-hires with identical last four digits of their social security numbers, and transferees with identical employment dates, will determine their relative placement by drawing numbers. |
It is for sure by SS# highest to lowest. 9999 is a great number to have.
|
Originally Posted by MoonShot
(Post 1570767)
Maybe they should draw numbers from a hat? How could anyone complain about that?
How would they figure out who got to draw first? Someone could sue because they were forced to draw last. I think age was the fairest, even though it put me three from the bottom, the older guys get a little bump to start their career, followed by 10-15 years of stagnation. Although that looks like it is about to change here soon. E |
http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...ps9c5fc2e2.png
God hasn't taunted the state of Georgia like this since, oh, well, I guess November 16th when Nick Marshall dropped back on 4th and 18... |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1570674)
Well Spud, my brother is also a biologist (PhD), and he says "we don't know if it's real. If it is ever proven to real, given the small sample size of the available data, we can't possibly know conclusively what might have caused it."
We could go round and round. You won't change my mind, and I won't change yours. I'll leave it there. The key words in that state statement are "sample size". Any statistician worth a s--t, would say that looking at the dynamics of a 6 billion year old planet and using the last 200 years of weather data and, 1. Thinking you had enough data to know what was truly going on, and 2. What was causing the fluctuations, is crazy talk. Is the climate changing? Yes. I live outside Chicago and if I compare this winter to the one two years ago, when I could leave the house with just a sweatshirt on most days, If that was the only information I used in my decision, I would be featured on next years "Doomsday Preppers". But I also remember 1976, and a lot of winters in between. We do know that back in the 1500-1600s that Europe went through a mini ice age, (They didn't call them the dark ages for nothing) while Greenland was fit for agriculture during the summer. This was because the Gulfstream that keeps Ireland and England relatively moderate during the winter actually reversed for a time and warmed Greenland and cooled Ireland, the UK, and Northern Europe, and this happened way before Internal combustion engines were invented or coal burning power plants. The climate is changing, but are we to blame? I think no. I can't remember who said it on here a few pages ago but, if this were truly about saving our environment, and not about grant money and carbon emission taxes, then the powers that be would be leaning on the biggest pollution culprits (China) to stop screwing up our environment, instead of just trying to scare us and profit from the whole thing. These guys that preach global warming/climate change don't seem to have a problem being the only passenger riding in a G-V while they do their National tour to promote environmental issues...why is that? They don't start throwing stones at China...why not? Because there isn't any money in that. Why did you try to rob that bank, sir? Cause that's where the money is. It is very important to preserve our Natural resources and protect our environment, don't get me wrong, but until someone rides their high horse over to Beijing and tells those guys to stop polluting our planet, unplugging my cable box every time I leave the house isn't going to guarantee a healthy environment for my kids. And if I unplug my cable box, my DVR won't record Real Housewives of (insert any city) for my wife. On second thought, maybe I do need to start being more environmentally conscientious. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1570864)
http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...ps9c5fc2e2.png
God hasn't taunted the state of Georgia like this since, oh, well, I guess November 16th when Nick Marshall dropped back on 4th and 18... |
Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
(Post 1570535)
Best. Photoshop. Ever.
Is that your work or did you find it somewhere. I need a copy of it! |
Trying to figure out how to get to work tomorrow. One flight looks like it will have a plane and flight attendants, but no pilots. Another flight looks like it will have a crew, but no plane. Another flight already cancelled. They are showing no delays, but these flights are leaving really early in the morning. Confusing. Obviously I am just going to go to the airport and hope for the best, but what a pain. Commuting is usually easy. I guess I'll probably spend a lot more time in the crew room or at my commuting airport before my sign in tomorrow than I usually do if I even make it.
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1570864)
http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...ps9c5fc2e2.png
God hasn't taunted the state of Georgia like this since, oh, well, I guess November 16th when Nick Marshall dropped back on 4th and 18... They bought some chains yesterday. They're ready for the next time. http://i1057.photobucket.com/albums/...ps07085703.jpg |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1570904)
Not to worry. The Georgia DOT has learned their lesson.
They bought some chains yesterday. They're ready for the next time. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:14 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands