Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Flamer 04-22-2014 04:42 AM


Originally Posted by Brocc15 (Post 1627874)
You are so angry, relax.... ;) but what is this about? why are you so mad? I actually don't get it, are you mad that he PD'd or that he accepted it last minute? I don't hold a line but I PD reserve days once in awhile so I'm curious what has someone get so mad in response to that comment.

It appears you are not keeping up. He was on reserve. He followed the contract. The company gave him the PD. He lost pay for that month.

No problem so far.

He did not like losing pay, and feels as though ALPA will not get him his back pay which is contractually due. He altered his behavior to follow a non-contractual memo which has the potential to create a loss of QOL.

You must now see that if everyone did this, then our contract is not work the paper it is written on. It also provides zero leverage to the pilot group and promotes the company to behave like this in the future.

Not mad at all.....just saying you should not worry about getting your pay back later, but follow the contract now. If I were to be mad at anyone, it would be the union leaders for not providing bold, unequivable guidance on this.

Purple Drank 04-22-2014 04:43 AM


Originally Posted by BigGuns (Post 1628022)
ALPA should offer!

I agree. As someone mentioned earlier, ALPA should have thought of it when SD released his contract-altering memo. The MEC has been utterly passive defending us.

"Our" "union" had no problem wasting tens of thousands of our dues dollars in fpl to fight the dpa to please Moak and the fat cats at national.

But when they have a chance to assist the line pilot on something this crucial, and garner leverage too...crickets. Just ambiguous, squishy suggestions instead of strong, decisive leadership.

MD writes a good letter. And that's about it, so far.

The Cavalier 04-22-2014 05:35 AM

I think proceeding cautiously is prudent. I agree that we need to stand up for the contract and should get something in return (say a 16 hour fallout?) but I'm not willing to see LC become a thing of the past because we towed the line on a 3 hour acknowledgement rule that many don't even use.

Dorfman 04-22-2014 05:48 AM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1627820)
So.... I have a carry out trip that goes the 1-3 of May.

There is a day trip on the first and a 2-day on the 2nd and 3rd that I'd prefer to swap that with.... but it's not letting me since the second trip (that i have to have for the drop portion due to rsv coverage) is in the May bid period. Am I hosed and stuck with the trip?

80,

Go ahead and swap for the 1 day trip only, icrew only looks at the coverage for this month so if you pick up a one day trip in essence you are dropping the three day for a one day. Then simply go into PCS for May and WS the 2 day.

Remember though that WS are run before the swap with the pot so it will take to PCS runs to do this.

crewdawg52 04-22-2014 07:03 AM


Originally Posted by Dorfman (Post 1628061)
80,

Go ahead and swap for the 1 day trip only, icrew only looks at the coverage for this month so if you pick up a one day trip in essence you are dropping the three day for a one day. Then simply go into PCS for May and WS the 2 day.

Remember though that WS are run before the swap with the pot so it will take to PCS runs to do this.

Me thinks 80 is on resv next month (2 May), so he's unable to WS or pick up that 2 dayer.

newKnow 04-22-2014 07:04 AM


Originally Posted by BigGuns (Post 1628022)
ALPA should offer!

If APLA offered to pay for the dropped trips, three things would happen:

1.) The reserve system would shut down.

2.) ALPA would go broke.

3.) Delta would take ALPA to court (and win).

gloopy 04-22-2014 07:27 AM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1627674)
We will never have support from the other employees. They are however essential to running the airline and our long term job security. That means that despite what some on the forum will say pilot contract negotiations are impacted by perceived issues from non contract employees. Even after contract 2012 resulted in significant gains for other employees there was considerable angst. A petition was submitted and almost every employee forum harangued managment for favoring the pilots. I loved one statement in a conference call where we were called "the chosen ones".

Pfffft whatever.

What.

Ever.

I have zero tolerance for that Bolshevik Occupy Red Square crap. Zero.

Every airline under the sun, DL especially, gives massive preference to other employee groups (current or former) who want to become pilots. As in pretty much on par with being a Check Airman for the Blue Angles Space Shuttle formation re-entry team.

While I think out on the line we need to remain the "quiet professionals" WRT issues like this, in the negotiating room whenever that ignorant manifesto crap is trotted out it needs to be smacked down hard, with righteous moral authority. No other group as a whole even comes remotely close to carrying the risks, having the skills or doing the job we do nor have they done what it takes to get here as a "new hire" like we have.

But as long as they were so enlightend to bring it up, which employee groups are back to pre-BK pay and which ones are not? That's what I thought. Besides its only 2 more weeks of school, just add it to your next recurrent and you'll be good to go.

Chosen ones? Seriously? We're working more than ever for historically less pay relative to any other work group and the costs/barrier to entry to even get here as a "new hire" to be junior to every entry level position for the rest of our careers are incredibly steep and expensive. I would hope that anyone on the NC or in any other role would piledrive that drivel into the mat, drop the mic into the lap of whoever vomited it up in the first place and walk out of the room for the rest of the day.

I would hope that the next time that nonsensical class warfare pinko propaganda is used on us we let it be known that point of view is wrong and entirely irrelevant.

Gack727 04-22-2014 07:30 AM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1628128)
Pfffft whatever.

What.

Ever.

I have zero tolerance for that Bolshevik Occupy Red Square crap. Zero.

Every airline under the sun, DL especially, gives massive preference to other employee groups (current or former) who want to become pilots. As in pretty much on par with being a Check Airman for the Blue Angles Space Shuttle formation re-entry team.

While I think out on the line we need to remain the "quiet professionals" WRT issues like this, in the negotiating room whenever that ignorant manifesto crap is trotted out it needs to be smacked down hard, with righteous moral authority. No other group as a whole even comes remotely close to carrying the risks, having the skills or doing the job we do nor have they done what it takes to get here as a "new hire" like we have.

But as long as they were so enlightend to bring it up, which employee groups are back to pre-BK pay and which ones are not? That's what I thought. Besides its only 2 more weeks of school, just add it to your next recurrent and you'll be good to go.

Chosen ones? Seriously? We're working more than ever for historically less pay relative to any other work group and the costs/barrier to entry to even get here as a "new hire" to be junior to every entry level position for the rest of our careers are incredibly steep and expensive. I would hope that anyone on the NC or in any other role would piledrive that drivel into the mat, drop the mic into the lap of whoever vomited it up in the first place and walk out of the room for the rest of the day.

I would hope that the next time that nonsensical class warfare pinko propaganda is used on us we let it be known that point of view is wrong and entirely irrelevant.

This!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

scambo1 04-22-2014 07:31 AM


Originally Posted by Gack727 (Post 1628134)
This!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No way man, I've got dibs on Gloopy being my hero.

gloopy 04-22-2014 07:36 AM


Originally Posted by newKnow (Post 1627935)
If he acknowledges what is on his schedule when he sees it, how is that not flying the contract?

I think the difference is doing it out of fear or reprisal when you otherwise would be getting uninterrupted rest for up to 9 hours like the long established status quo. Checking or not checking immediately are IAW the PWA, but checking by force and fear because of management threats and an atempted contract rewrite fantasy memo against doing the other 100% legal IAW the contract option is the issue.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:43 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands