![]() |
|
Originally Posted by dalad
(Post 1627361)
I would venture to guess they are filling up to the G/S trigger.
Personally I would like to see a cap on pay of 80 hours per month with anything above 80 going into the bank but even then the max monthly would be 85. Over 85 hours and something would have to be dropped. |
Originally Posted by Flamer
(Post 1627427)
Congratulations, you are now SD's B****. If everyone did what you did, there would be no problem and we could just write our contract in pencil and hand the company an eraser.
|
Originally Posted by UGBSM
(Post 1627459)
Me neither. Of course you can avoid sit length in PBS and PCS. But
a long sit usually means a long duty day, pushing FAR117 limits. I,ve seen lots of 12:30+ scheduled days with a 13 hour max. Saw a 12:53 scheduled four leg domestic... very common. Pilots routinely accepting extended duty days only encourages this scheduling practice. And from that Aviation Week article: " In terms of hours and cycles remaining in the design life, Delta could theoretically operate the MD-90s for another 50 years, based on the current dispatch profile." OH BOY! |
Originally Posted by Flamer
(Post 1627694)
I'm following the contract, not the memo. Have been on the phone with the ALPA scheduling genious a lot, had CPO threats and they even dug out my families phone number from my emergency contact section and they called that too. Real classy.
You have go to stand up for yourself and other union members when you know you are right. Tip.....know you are right, and you will be fine. Keep the union in the loop. Nothing is going to change as long as we capitulate to unilateral contract changes. |
So.... I have a carry out trip that goes the 1-3 of May.
There is a day trip on the first and a 2-day on the 2nd and 3rd that I'd prefer to swap that with.... but it's not letting me since the second trip (that i have to have for the drop portion due to rsv coverage) is in the May bid period. Am I hosed and stuck with the trip? |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1627820)
So.... I have a carry out trip that goes the 1-3 of May.
There is a day trip on the first and a 2-day on the 2nd and 3rd that I'd prefer to swap that with.... but it's not letting me since the second trip (that i have to have for the drop portion due to rsv coverage) is in the May bid period. Am I hosed and stuck with the trip? No way can Delta's Lack of Technology handle such a transaction!:rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Dorfman
(Post 1627766)
Excellent to hear. I actually agree with Purple that the union should come out and make 0% interest loans to guys like you to offset the PD. In fact if that was done and more people followed the letter of the contract the 117 negotiations would already be done.
If scheduling calls you 15 hours out, and you answer the phone and immediately acknowledge, you are following "the letter of the contract" just as much as if you waited until three hours prior. |
Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
(Post 1627778)
You are probably right...... But on an even bigger picture if there was no GS, ability to pick up 15 over ALV, ability to fly extra in vacation months, swap with pot to go even higher than ALV + 15, how many additional positions do you think we would need?
Personally I would like to see a cap on pay of 80 hours per month with anything above 80 going into the bank but even then the max monthly would be 85. Over 85 hours and something would have to be dropped. But, that is not the system we have |
Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
(Post 1627778)
You are probably right...... But on an even bigger picture if there was no GS, ability to pick up 15 over ALV, ability to fly extra in vacation months, swap with pot to go even higher than ALV + 15, how many additional positions do you think we would need?
Personally I would like to see a cap on pay of 80 hours per month with anything above 80 going into the bank but even then the max monthly would be 85. Over 85 hours and something would have to be dropped. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1627616)
Thanks for posting that.
It has been a while. Wasn't there something about the Court ordering the pilots back to work and the APA actually holding the Judge's Order to a vote? When the APA voted against the Judge's Order he hammered them (in effect showing his was in fact, larger than their's). While it was certainly fun watching the APA tell the Judge to shove the RLA up his neither regions, public defiance of authority never seems to work out as well as it does in the movies. Correct me. Is my memory accurate on this? That sickout was really really stupid. There is a right way and a wrong way to hammer mgmt when appropriate, but that was the wrong way. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:28 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands