Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Check Essential 05-08-2014 09:17 AM


Originally Posted by CGfalconHerc (Post 1638841)
Was reading an article in AW&S about 6 months ago about Skywest's large order for Mitsubishi RJ's along with more E175's. They asked the Mitsubishi program manager about how the new MRJ's exceeded the MGTOW for all of Skywest's scope provisions with DAL. The program manager let the cat out of the bag when he said they would "just have dual certifications that would meet any required scope limitations".

ALPA needs to be on the lookout for pencil whipping!

Or another "separate certificate" trick just like Republic Air Holdings and their Frontier A-319s.

ALPA's performance on that fiasco was not exactly stellar.
We all thought our scope clause prevented a codeshare partner from using the revenue they get from Delta to set up as a competitor flying "non-permitted" aircraft.
Turns out -- not so much. Our high dollar battalion of lawyers left a little loophole.

Denny Crane 05-08-2014 09:19 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1638849)
... and that is the way it is now.

But make no mistake, they perform Delta flying which we PERMIT to be outsourced in our Section 1. We define the operation and if you want to define it so that our "craft and class" must interview then you elect Reps who want that.

Meanwhile other groups of "craft and class," like managers, cross the arbitrary inter divisional shell game with no loss of longevity.

The price of preserving your distinction only costs one employee group, pilots.

It is in ALPA's best long term interest to rid this profession of alter ego replacement flying. Politically we are not there yet, but your world is changing, for the better.

No argument from me with anything above, I would welcome the change.

Denny

Bucking Bar 05-08-2014 09:29 AM


Originally Posted by CGfalconHerc (Post 1638841)
Was reading an article in AW&S about 6 months ago about Skywest's large order for Mitsubishi RJ's along with more E175's. They asked the Mitsubishi program manager about how the new MRJ's exceeded the MGTOW for all of Skywest's scope provisions with DAL. The program manager let the cat out of the bag when he said they would "just have dual certifications that would meet any required scope limitations".

ALPA needs to be on the lookout for pencil whipping!

Yes.

This happens with the Republic fleet now (I ordered the aircraft records and spoke with their program manager). The GTF jets have a heavier BOW which squeezes their capacities under our Section 1.

I think Expressjet' s refusal to play along with the Pinnacle concessions makes it difficult for them (and Skywest) unless Anderson backs down.

Notice that Delta did not order half of what they were allowed to outsource in C 2012. I suspect (speculation alert) someone did the math and learned it makes more sense to operate these airplanes at their Certified limits rather than our scope limits ... In other words "Delta pilots."

Gunhog 05-08-2014 09:31 AM

For those of you that still own any Delta stock from the merger -

I called Fidelity today and confirmed we do get the stock dividend quarterly payout. But since the Delta Pilot stock fund is a frozen fund the dividends are not used to buy additional Delta stock. The dividend money is immediately transferred to your money market account within your 401K retirement portfolio.

CGfalconHerc 05-08-2014 09:35 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1638866)
Yes.

This happens with the Republic fleet now (I ordered the aircraft records and spoke with their program manager). The GTF jets have a heavier BOW which squeezes their capacities under our Section 1.

I think Expressjet' s refusal to play along with the Pinnacle concessions makes it difficult for them (and Skywest) unless Anderson backs down.

Notice that Delta did not order half of what they were allowed to outsource in C 2012. I suspect (speculation alert) someone did the math and learned it makes more sense to operate these airplanes at their Certified limits rather than our scope limits ... In other words "Delta pilots."

Hope your "crystal ball" is accurate. Tie that to RA's comments regarding the GTF and C-series and we may see some of that outsourced flying come back to mainline. It would definitely make DL the preferred destination for new-hires compared to AA/UCAL..and as the overall pool of approx 10k ATP's gets sucked up, the legacy who can staff the operation wins..JMHO.

I know I'd love to fly a C-series back up to FCA, JAC, HDN, BZN...!

Bucking Bar 05-08-2014 09:38 AM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1638857)
Our high dollar battalion of lawyers left a little loophole.

That was by design. We facilitate outsourcing and having more bidders results in lower prices ... which creates the differential that pays us for permitting others to do our work.

We did not screw up, legally.

flyallnite 05-08-2014 09:45 AM


Originally Posted by CGfalconHerc (Post 1638872)
Hope your "crystal ball" is accurate. Tie that to RA's comments regarding the GTF and C-series and we may see some of that outsourced flying come back to mainline. It would definitely make DL the preferred destination for new-hires compared to AA/UCAL.

I know I'd love to fly a C-series back up to FCA, JAC, HDN, BZN...!

EB said earlier in the year that SLC will see an increase of about 10 percent capacity and will be all 2 class service by 2017. The new terminal will be built by 2019 and it will look much like a mini-Detroit configuration. I wouldn't be surprised to see mainline flying replacing the RJ's out of there.

tsquare 05-08-2014 09:52 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1638866)
Yes.

This happens with the Republic fleet now (I ordered the aircraft records and spoke with their program manager). The GTF jets have a heavier BOW which squeezes their capacities under our Section 1.

I think Expressjet' s refusal to play along with the Pinnacle concessions makes it difficult for them (and Skywest) unless Anderson backs down.

Notice that Delta did not order half of what they were allowed to outsource in C 2012. I suspect (speculation alert) someone did the math and learned it makes more sense to operate these airplanes at their Certified limits rather than our scope limits ... In other words "Delta pilots."


That's fine.. The company can pay mainline rates for them too. non-negotiable imho.

sinca3 05-08-2014 09:58 AM


Originally Posted by duece12345 (Post 1638805)
I was hired this year. I 100% agree! I was just responding to his post clarifying that there are people leaving DAL for other airlines.

Were said pilots in the pool for interviews or class dates? Either way they weren't "on property" therefore not earning a paycheck and had to split...totally understandable! Too, bad for DAL but I still stand by my premise. E
Eg. Eagle pilot living in Dallas hired by both AA and DAL chose DAL and a commute over AA.

Bucking Bar 05-08-2014 09:58 AM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1638888)
That's fine.. The company can pay mainline rates for them too. non-negotiable imho.

I think we should pay by the seat / speed / productivity matrix we have always tried to negotiate. By that standard you and I are currently underpaid and need to be brought up. Do I have a second?

Another consideration is we need to get flying on the property. Once we own the market, then we price the market.

Both considerations benefit you and are in perfect alignment with each other, as well as long standing labor practice.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:29 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands