![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1650231)
While I did argue on this board that they were no less safe than a leg to SA or an all-nighter ANC - ATL,
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1650294)
For insomniacs, very cool meteor shower tonight. May wake the kids about 3:20 in North America.
We will pass through an old debris trail from 209P/LINEAR tonight and tommorrow. This one will look like a hyperspace leap towards the North Pole because of the angle of the collision. Should be a good show with 100 to 400 meteors per hour which are larger than typical. So at least I have something to look forward to on my San Juan late late nighter.... Thanks. Seriously. |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1650340)
First...as I mentioned a while back, I am fortunate that I didn't need the loan. Someone else might.
How does you mocking their situations foster "unity?" Pretty low class, really. For that matter, how does you playing the north/south card promote unity? Let's look at this whole process from management's perspective. Today, they had a hotwash with their union buster to critique the test run of their C15 strategy. It's called "Divide and Conquer." Here's how it works: - the union buster writes a memo that totally ignores the contract. SD signs it. - DALPA hems, haws and fails to provide decisive leadership, implicitly condoning the memo - the company takes hostages by monetarily and psychologically penalizing those who stand up for the contract - DALPA doesn't do jack **** to assist the hostages - the guys who step up despise DALPA for a lack of backbone - guys who aren't personally affected see DALPA rolling over; disunity ensues - several months or years later, DALPA produces an inadequate TA and MD writes a "victory lap" memo - yada yada yada (the closest description I can manage to describe what just happened) - we get our asses handed to us a la C12 Bar, you preach "unity" but blindly fail to recognize that DALPA's actions (or inactions) are largely at fault. Dude, seriously. Stop digging. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1650566)
So at least I have something to look forward to on my San Juan late late nighter.... Thanks. Seriously.
And you're *****ing about a night flight to San Juan? |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1650387)
Translation: I'm too scared to ever do anything but take whatever is offered first.
|
Originally Posted by Hawaii50
(Post 1650487)
Oh boy Carl's back! Are those helicopters black?
|
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1650568)
Stop drooling, wake up and look left. :D
And you're *****ing about a night flight to San Juan? |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1650573)
Not *****ing about it really. I just failed bidding this month and it wasn't my preference. I don't like backside of the clock and I can finally avoid it....
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1650564)
And like I replied, that logic is flawed, and just plain wrong.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1650547)
ADG going to 5:15 is a possible good thing depending on how management responds to attempt to use or misuse it. Crew rest on the A330 appears to be a clear improvement also. Everything else seems like moving the deck chairs around at best.
I would argue that not allowing flights more than 14 hours out (plus report) to be used for reroute before they've been run through trip coverage is a step in the right direction in limiting reroutes. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:47 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands