![]() |
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1654842)
That's quite short sighted. Why not shore something up when it is extremely cheap vs paying full price? If we don't take care of it now, the pendulum will swing back again the other direction and bite us again.
Denny |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 1654850)
I agree with Ts on this one. With the coming of the 1500 hour rule, I'm not so sure the pendulum is swinging any more.
Denny |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1654842)
That's quite short sighted. Why not shore something up when it is extremely cheap vs paying full price? If we don't take care of it now, the pendulum will swing back again the other direction and bite us again.
|
So with the new guarantee of 5:15 per day for reserve, am I right to assume that reserve will pay 84 hours for a 14 day off reserve line (16 days on) and 89:15 for 13 days off reserve line (17 days on)?
One more, so 10am is the earliest report for reserve and 12noon with the commuter option. Do your two flights for the call-in-honest have to be in before 10am or noon? |
Originally Posted by Flamer
(Post 1654869)
Because how much you care about outsourcing is inversely proportional to your seniority.
I'm confused.:confused: Denny |
Originally Posted by [email protected]
(Post 1654896)
So with the new guarantee of 5:15 per day for reserve, am I right to assume that reserve will pay 84 hours for a 14 day off reserve line (16 days on) and 89:15 for 13 days off reserve line (17 days on)?
|
The minimum reserve guarantee is 72:00 hours and the maximum is 80:00 hours.
Denny |
Originally Posted by [email protected]
(Post 1654896)
So with the new guarantee of 5:15 per day for reserve, am I right to assume that reserve will pay 84 hours for a 14 day off reserve line (16 days on) and 89:15 for 13 days off reserve line (17 days on)?
One more, so 10am is the earliest report for reserve and 12noon with the commuter option. Do your two flights for the call-in-honest have to be in before 10am or noon? |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 1654897)
Now I think that's an unfair characterization. I kinda feel like darned if you do and darned if you don't. I know I'm going to regret this but it seems to me you guys are critical of senior guys about scope no matter what we say. Consider the discussion about small jet scope in contract 2012. On the one hand, it's now contractual about getting rid of 100's of 50 seat RJ's for some some more 70+ seaters. On the other hand, the 50 seaters were going away anyway. Okay, you convinced me, they were/are going away anyway. Now why would I want to spend negotiating capital to make it contractual? Isn't that what we did in C2012 and many guys were upset about the deal?
I'm confused.:confused: Denny |
Originally Posted by CGfalconHerc
(Post 1654737)
Buy the C-series, bring the flying back to mainline, and be done with it..
Unfortunately, it will be some time in the "foreseeable future" before we can unravel outsourcing.. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:50 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands