![]() |
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1662819)
Nothing so nefarious as an area 51 kinda thing, but I think that the effect of PBS has been trivialized from the beginning. I cannot prove it, it is a gut feeling, but it seems very logical to me. Nd as I said, the percentages add up, and they are all linked. To say that PBS was a merely a 5% concession is disingenuous.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1662896)
PBS was just under 5%. The biggest manning changes over time were elimination of the hard cap,bow wave and vacation changes. The average Block hours per pilot has increased from 600 to 800 per year. Having said that we are still one of the least efficient us airlines.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1662896)
Having said that we are still one of the least efficient us airlines.
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1662833)
My primary concern is whether or not she can grow a mustache.
|
Originally Posted by EdGrimley
(Post 1662906)
Delta management states Delta is most efficient US airlines to investors. Are they lying?
|
Originally Posted by 76drvr
(Post 1662595)
Pure speculation on your part, which conflicts with statements made in SEC filings and investor presentations. Enjoy the growth brought to you by C2012.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1662912)
I don't care, and neither should you. If what Freebird said is right, we are 25% more efficient than we were. That is enough. Again, I am not going to argue for restoration or any of that all in one fell swoop, but PBS and all the ancillary agreements made us waaaay more efficient than we were. We will NEVER be as efficient as SWA or many of the single airframe carriers, but I'll betcha a cold one we are light years ahead of any of the legacys.
You may not care how we compare against other airlines but if we are working for release from the NMB they will. It's a key component of total pilot block hour cost. I fully realize that some of the productivity issue is the result of managements fleet plan choices where they seek out every orphaned and bastard aircraft type to operate. DALPA will certainly have to make that point in negotiations but they are also going to have to provide numbers on what shortfalls are contractual verses fleet plan against our competitors. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1662954)
They are not talking about pilots.
UCAL? No work rules. So I don't feel sorry for being more inefficient. UsAir? :D Who cares if we are more inefficient then they. American? That would be interested to know. Alaskan? I don't really think we should compare ourselves to a Delta Connection carrier. Who did I leave out? FedEx? Cargo. UPS? Cargo. I can live with being more inefficient and demand for more. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1662833)
My primary concern is whether or not she can grow a mustache.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1662896)
. Having said that we are still one of the least efficient us airlines.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:36 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands