Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

sailingfun 06-11-2014 05:26 PM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1662819)
Nothing so nefarious as an area 51 kinda thing, but I think that the effect of PBS has been trivialized from the beginning. I cannot prove it, it is a gut feeling, but it seems very logical to me. Nd as I said, the percentages add up, and they are all linked. To say that PBS was a merely a 5% concession is disingenuous.

PBS was just under 5%. The biggest manning changes over time were elimination of the hard cap,bow wave and vacation changes. The average Block hours per pilot has increased from 600 to 800 per year. Having said that we are still one of the least efficient us airlines.

EdGrimley 06-11-2014 05:43 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1662896)
PBS was just under 5%. The biggest manning changes over time were elimination of the hard cap,bow wave and vacation changes. The average Block hours per pilot has increased from 600 to 800 per year. Having said that we are still one of the least efficient us airlines.

Delta management states Delta is most efficient US airlines to investors. Are they lying?

tsquare 06-11-2014 06:01 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1662896)
Having said that we are still one of the least efficient us airlines.

I don't care, and neither should you. If what Freebird said is right, we are 25% more efficient than we were. That is enough. Again, I am not going to argue for restoration or any of that all in one fell swoop, but PBS and all the ancillary agreements made us waaaay more efficient than we were. We will NEVER be as efficient as SWA or many of the single airframe carriers, but I'll betcha a cold one we are light years ahead of any of the legacys.

Mesabah 06-11-2014 06:02 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1662833)
My primary concern is whether or not she can grow a mustache.

http://i58.tinypic.com.jpg

sailingfun 06-11-2014 07:35 PM


Originally Posted by EdGrimley (Post 1662906)
Delta management states Delta is most efficient US airlines to investors. Are they lying?

They are not talking about pilots.

forgot to bid 06-11-2014 07:42 PM


Originally Posted by 76drvr (Post 1662595)
Pure speculation on your part, which conflicts with statements made in SEC filings and investor presentations. Enjoy the growth brought to you by C2012.

http://i.imgur.com/ZVmuOZX.gif

sailingfun 06-11-2014 07:43 PM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1662912)
I don't care, and neither should you. If what Freebird said is right, we are 25% more efficient than we were. That is enough. Again, I am not going to argue for restoration or any of that all in one fell swoop, but PBS and all the ancillary agreements made us waaaay more efficient than we were. We will NEVER be as efficient as SWA or many of the single airframe carriers, but I'll betcha a cold one we are light years ahead of any of the legacys.

As I posted the block hour average has gone from 600 to 800 per year. Another poster mentioned the system block hours were the same in 07 as 01 yet we had 25 percent fewer pilots. That is all correct. It is about 25%.
You may not care how we compare against other airlines but if we are working for release from the NMB they will. It's a key component of total pilot block hour cost. I fully realize that some of the productivity issue is the result of managements fleet plan choices where they seek out every orphaned and bastard aircraft type to operate. DALPA will certainly have to make that point in negotiations but they are also going to have to provide numbers on what shortfalls are contractual verses fleet plan against our competitors.

forgot to bid 06-11-2014 07:46 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1662954)
They are not talking about pilots.

Are we comparing ourselves to SWA? I could see where they're more efficient, for starters, they don't have a single block hour that requires 4 pilots on the airplane.

UCAL? No work rules. So I don't feel sorry for being more inefficient.

UsAir? :D Who cares if we are more inefficient then they.

American? That would be interested to know.

Alaskan? I don't really think we should compare ourselves to a Delta Connection carrier.

Who did I leave out? FedEx? Cargo. UPS? Cargo.

I can live with being more inefficient and demand for more.

Elliot 06-11-2014 07:51 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1662833)
My primary concern is whether or not she can grow a mustache.

How do you know she doesn't already have a mustache? :eek:

ImTumbleweed 06-11-2014 08:02 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1662896)
. Having said that we are still one of the least efficient us airlines.

Said the ALPA national guy who doesn't fly a line....


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:36 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands