![]() |
|
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1717834)
I keep hearing that too, but I can't seem to find the napkin with the math on it to show how it can be the case.
BTW, what do you think the potential 787 on this RFP means?... what happens if the 787 loses? Do we cancel existing orders? If it wins, do we take orders we were going to take anyway, and if so could they realistically even be on property prior to 2020 anyway? Or do you think they are potential "growth" 787's and we will still take the 2020 ones anyway? I don't know. The debate over the Import Export Bank involved some rather explicit rebuttals on both sides. One would not think Boeing would "trash talk" a premier client like Delta if Boeing were hopeful for an order. The 787 is at least $15 million more than the A330. In my view the 787-900 is right sized for a large number of missions and it's fuel numbers have been coming in even better than promised. I figured the A330/NEO for a winner until Qantas backed out of their order. That leaves the right airplanes at the right price for Delta. As completely screwed up as Boeing is (analysts putting sell ratings on Boeing the last few days because of 777 sales not being sufficient to keep the line operating until the -X programme) I would still like to see a 777 and 787 order. IMHO it is a better airplane, but I'm hugely biased towards the Boeing jet as a pilot. |
Originally Posted by Piklepausepull
(Post 1717842)
Just heard via the grapevine that the "merger committee" has been holding "emergency" meetings!
I wonder what's up?!?!?! Anyone else? |
Originally Posted by AirCav
(Post 1717833)
United Airlines plans to retire its 50-seat regional jets by next year, instead deploying larger Embraer regional jets that can seat 76 passengers. The Trefis Team writes that "fleet restructuring focused on replacing older, less fuel-efficient airplanes with new, more fuel-efficient airplanes will add growth to United's results in the coming years." Forbes (8/29) Imagine that...an airline managed to get rid of 50 seaters without its union telling the pilots some story... |
Originally Posted by Roadkill
(Post 1717797)
Just saw on news delta had to divert into Jackson for an unruly pax. Something about an argument over reclining seat. Figured details would be here already...man we are slipping!
;-) |
Originally Posted by satchip
(Post 1717186)
Isn't speeding a crime?:rolleyes:
Carl |
Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
(Post 1717830)
Bucking Bar,
I don't know when you were hired, however in my years here I know that this will never happen and the FA's DO have a pseudo union in ALPA. Just look the history of how they end up getting whatever we negotiate to some extent. Profit sharing was one. |
Originally Posted by Roadkill
(Post 1717797)
Just saw on news delta had to divert into Jackson for an unruly pax. Something about an argument over reclining seat. Figured details would be here already...man we are slipping!
;-) Need a company policy on how to handle this situation... probably will see it again. |
Originally Posted by iceman49
(Post 1717901)
Re: the profit sharing, don't know how you could exclude any group from sharing in the profits if you are part of the company...
|
As long as the large RJ's are permitted flying in section 1, they can be flown anywhere, at any rates, even on the Delta cert. Even when DCI falls apart, you will still have to spend negotiating capital to bring the RJ rates up to mainline standards.
Also, since Endeavor is ALPA, single carrier status does not apply with the NMB, so there can be no staple, unless 51%+ of the Delta pilots vote for it. Not going to happen in 100 billion years. |
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1717908)
I am fairly certain that different employee groups could well have different profit sharing plans as part of their overall compensation. Management certainly does...
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:29 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands