![]() |
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1725951)
Ask yourself what a micro base is and how the company would like to handle staffing and reserves in such a base?
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1725951)
Perhaps however you guys are making much ado about nothing as far as the ER program. You have missed the forest for the trees as far as widebody redeployment with the 747's is concerned. I am going to pull a Jerry and throw a hand grenade in the room.
Ask yourself what a micro base is and how the company would like to handle staffing and reserves in such a base? |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1725956)
Shirley, you don't mean the satellite base monster is rearing its' ugly head, again?
|
My buddy in MSP said one of the guys running for FO rep is married to a flight ops manager in the MSP CPO?? Can anyone confirm?
If so...gives new relevance to the complaint that ALPA is in bed with management. :eek: On the surface, that potential situation seems fraught with downside for the pilot group. |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1725973)
My buddy in MSP said one of the guys running for FO rep is married to a flight ops manager in the MSP CPO?? Can anyone confirm?
If so...gives new relevance to the complaint that ALPA is in bed with management. :eek: |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 1725935)
I've been watching the discussion over the past week, or so, and that's the thing I don't understand.
Twenty-five 747captains taking early retirement, instead of twenty-five pilots taking displacements to the A330, hurts me how? In fact, how doesn't that help me? :confused: First of all, I'll betcha no where near 25 guys will take it. 15 if we are LUCKY. The 25 non-74 guys will take it, but won't be displaced anyway until they are supposed to leave. So those guys get a really really really good deal. They get the package, and get to hang around until they have to retire anyway, AND.. get a really nice bonus check just for signing up. All the 747 early retirement does is protect the bottom 31 -74 guys. All this will do is postpone the inevitable, and give a really select group a great deal. IMHO, it sets a horrible precedence, and bails the company out of a bunch of training. You and I get bupkus out of this deal. Carl and his buddies get a great deal... again. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1725951)
Perhaps however you guys are making much ado about nothing as far as the ER program. You have missed the forest for the trees as far as widebody redeployment with the 747's is concerned. I am going to pull a Jerry and throw a hand grenade in the room.
Ask yourself what a micro base is and how the company would like to handle staffing and reserves in such a base? |
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 1725739)
Actually it is a 72 year old virgin (confusion in translation). Won't those exploding Mo's be surprised.
|
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1725426)
So once again, the Network and Crew Resources guys open a 777 base for a few years, only to close it...because THEY moved the flying around...
These guys are Brilliant! I swear, they only do it to justify their own existence!:rolleyes: Here's a CLUE for those clueless nitwits: Delta only has 18 777's!! BASE THEM ALL IN ATL (like they were at one time) and let everyone DH from there! (you morons!) :rolleyes:
Originally Posted by SailingFun
Ask yourself what a micro base is and how the company would like to handle staffing and reserves in such a base?
Think of what 777/747 guys (who are a majority commuters) would love. |
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 1725990)
and
They are talking about similar things. Think about what a "mini base" or "micro base" would be like. Think of what 777/747 guys (who are a majority commuters) would love. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:49 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands