![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1867074)
Company: Prepare to be emasculated!
ALPA: Yes, I agree. Would be funny if it weren't so sad. Carl |
Where is the seniority calculator on the ALPA website?
|
Fixed it for you!
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1867074)
Company: Prepare to be emasculated!
ALPA, apa, usapa,swapa,etc: Yes, I agree. Would be funny if it weren't so sad. Pilots in general are too timid and too leveraged to put up a fight. They will accept the crumbs and complain. During our lockout/strike of 1998, the largest group clamoring for a deal were the widebody capts. Some said they couldn't miss one paycheck. Carl |
As usual, when I come out of lurker mode, I get verbal diahrrea. So be advised: probably TL;DR.
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1866818)
I guess you are not counting the '88 FOs who were furloughed for years while thousands of RJ Pilots were being hired. No need to single out any group - we all got hosed.
Scoop Exactly! In general, we need to look up from our own rice bowls and see what is going on with this "career". There is some real Lord of the Flies stuff going on in the regional sector now. While the demise of regionals as we know them may be imminent, and I know many of you will celebrate the day, the regional pilots will be making up a larger percentage of your list in the future. And the attitudes and behaviors they have learned/ developed will come with them. I know you (DL especially), believe that your vetting process is really great, but the system in general is rewarding some of the worst behavior. Pilots have always eaten their young, ie- Wilber vs Orvil, CA vs FO, WB vs NB, INT vs DOM, mainline vs regional, but a whole generation is coming up with a need for instant gratification and a mercenary mindset. And if there is one thing they can do, it is work the system, check the boxes, work the gouge, and get coached through an interview. And the way things are going is proving to them, that throwing your co-workers under the bus is the way to get ahead. You guys (mainline pilots/DALPA) are the adults in the room. And if you do not use your wisdom and the little bit of power you have (compared to the complete lack at the regional level) to guide/mentor or even discipline the kids to point them in the right direction, a lot of the issues y'ins are discussing, ie. C2015 are going to be a lot harder to deal with in the future. And I absolutely sympathize with the early aughts furloughs. If only scope had been locked down and those RJs had been piloted by DL pilots- problem solved. But that wasn't how it went down, and remember that plenty of regional pilots have been furloughed also. ASA took a number of the Delta furloughs temporarily, without any fuss, but not many years later we were furloughing. Imagine going into a that with the resources of a minimum wage worker, right at the 2008 downturn. And a lot of them are the same ones who after recall, put in 5ish years on reserve as regional FOs, are looking at 10+ year upgrades and may never get a shot at being a 88FO for Delta. I still have hope that DL will get far enough down into the stack to reach my very mediocre application, and that I might get to join you in the promised land- before they shut the doors here. And if I do, I am sure my perspective will change, and whether or not my ox is the one getting gored will inform my opinions. But right now, things are looking pretty bleak. |
Originally Posted by BigGuns
(Post 1867091)
Where is the seniority calculator on the ALPA website?
It lets you plot your seniority in your category, as well as other categories. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1866652)
But it is allergies. :D I swear.
I cut the grass and I'm a mess. 3-4 months every Spring in the state of Georgia I am a mess. I've lived in Alabama and Virginia and never had allergy problems. Moved to Georgia and boom. And I called in sick when it was too much not long ago and got a rather snide response from a scheduler. Total crap imho. Rarely ever do I call in sick and when I do the schedulers act ****ed. In a category with 2-3x required staffing. |
Originally Posted by Schwanker
(Post 1866740)
Hey if it's good, it won't matter. 63% will vote for something less than I believe we should settle for. IMO of course.
Nothing knee jerk about it. Actually, well thought out. |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1866704)
My jaw just about hit the floor when I read the "Update" put out by the MEC from their Special Meeting. The "develop the ability to say yes" piece.
It sounded like we've already surrendered and they are starting to prepare the pilots for the bad news. That was possibly the most horrible and demoralizing thing any union could have published at this point in a contract cycle. But then I told myself, "Self. This can't be what it sounds like. Its way too early. They just need to fire the Communications guy. That can't be the real tone of the meeting." Now this leak of the specifics they've been discussing at that meeting. Oh no. C2012 deja vu. 4833 and all the other concessions started with a leak exactly like this. This is bad. This is real bad. The piece I didn't like was the suggestion that an election means we must rush. It's amazing how willing we are to anticipate and magnify threats. That being said, the way I interpreted the discussion is Donatelli requesting the MEC to behave like honorable men, and a functional body. If we demonstrate the same divisions that we showed during/after C2012, and the modified TA that included the CDO's, we're going to cost ourselves a lot of money. Like it or not, the leverage of the guy(s) negotiating the deal increases when he/they have a legitimate claim to represent the group. The less certainty in the outcome of a TA, the less value it will have. I know this isn't an easy concept to acknowledge, but it's the way it works. MEC develops clear position that respects group, members back consensus > NC speaks for a unified body > all parties have confidence in outcome > parties can commit to a deal = maximum leverage. A divided MEC + members that leak selectively > crippled NC that can only offer a TA that will be subject to an uncertain outcome at MEC = marginal results. So I don't just scrutinize Donatelli's words, but I also look at the contents of the leaks. When I see words like "good men" and "weak links", I know I'm being manipulated. Now, we might assign more weight to one group or another, but the fact that we're manipulated at all just about guarantees we'll be poorer. The fact that this MEC leaks, and selectively, really bothers me. The people doing the leaking are doing serious damage, and probably doing the company's job by resetting expectations lower. All that being said, there seems to be an extraordinary enthusiasm to move forward and get to a deal that frankly, I don't understand. I have the uneasy feeling of watching a new airplane that may not be quite ready, being placed on a very aggressive testing schedule. AND now the test crew is fighting among themselves. I don't know if this thing will fly, but the infighting is a bad sign, a real bad sign. |
Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
(Post 1867175)
I used to be like that...absolutely miserable for 3 months every year, until I got a prescription for Flonase. Literally changed my life. The key is you have to use it everyday this time of year, not just when you have symptoms.
I used Flonase for a while...they sell it over the counter now. It does work if you use it every day. I would forget to use it when I got home from a trip for a couple of days and then be back to square one so I started using Claritin and I start taking it a couple days before a trip. My problem isn't so much seasonal allergies, but I swear I'm allergic to the dust, dead skin, and mold in the 75/76 ducts. I'm fine at home but after a couple legs on a trip and I start getting the symptoms...throw in a FL layover and I'm really stuffed up. A day or two after coming home and I'm fine again. I had the same problem on the 88. If I start taking Claritin a day or two before a trip, it really helps, but not 100%. |
Originally Posted by Leroy Smith
(Post 1866783)
Many pilots got five more years as a RJ FO.
88FO = rich people problems. I know, not your problem. But "let them eat cake" has a way of circling its way back to the ruling class in ways they don't like. We are the 1%: You need $34k income to be in the global elite... and half the world's richest live in the U.S. | Daily Mail Online Tread lightly with that populist garbage. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:30 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands