Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
05-06-2016 | 04:58 AM
Otto
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
From: Turkish Pile Driver
For the longest time there was no such animal as Economy Comfort, and we dh countless times without it.
This sucks...but is has nothing to do with pilots and contract negotiations. It is about the company trying to generate more revenue, plain and simple...it still sucks though.
This sucks...but is has nothing to do with pilots and contract negotiations. It is about the company trying to generate more revenue, plain and simple...it still sucks though.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOcvH4b0Opk
05-06-2016 | 05:21 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,193
Likes: 255
More revenue more profit sharing. Bigger fish to fry than EC seats on DH
Last edited by Trip7; 05-06-2016 at 05:35 AM.
05-06-2016 | 05:26 AM
New Hire
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Whats the junior CA DOH on the 320?
05-06-2016 | 05:34 AM
Works Every Weekend
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
If management makes a change that "sucks" for working pilots, it is illegal.
Their intent is irrelevant.
05-06-2016 | 05:35 AM
Otto
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
From: Turkish Pile Driver
Every contract violation needs to be rigorously fought, there are no little fish when the company violates the contract.
05-06-2016 | 05:36 AM
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 852
Likes: 1
05-06-2016 | 05:38 AM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,193
Likes: 255
Why not get rid of business class international? Why not remove crew meals? How about reducing per diem by a nickel per hour? Now you have to wear your hat to the pool while on layover...
Every contract violation needs to be rigorously fought, there are no little fish when the company violates the contract.
Every contract violation needs to be rigorously fought, there are no little fish when the company violates the contract.
05-06-2016 | 05:43 AM
Banned
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Why not get rid of business class international? Why not remove crew meals? How about reducing per diem by a nickel per hour? Now you have to wear your hat to the pool while on layover...
Every contract violation needs to be rigorously fought, there are no little fish when the company violates the contract.
Every contract violation needs to be rigorously fought, there are no little fish when the company violates the contract.
05-06-2016 | 05:45 AM
Works Every Weekend
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Why not get rid of business class international? Why not remove crew meals? How about reducing per diem by a nickel per hour? Now you have to wear your hat to the pool while on layover...
Every contract violation needs to be rigorously fought, there are no little fish when the company violates the contract.
Every contract violation needs to be rigorously fought, there are no little fish when the company violates the contract.
There is no contract violation here but there is a change in the status quo in violation of the Railway Labor Act.
Changes to "working conditions" do not have to be contract violations.
There's a ton of case law on that exact point.
The company could do this if we weren't in section 6. But we are.
Throughout this mandatory period of bargaining required under section 6 of
the RLA and the mediation process set forth in section 155 including the 30 day
cooling-off period after the failure of the mediatory efforts, the parties may
not alter the status quo, i.e., neither party may implement a change in the
actual objective working conditions broadly conceived, whether embodied in
agreements or not.
US Supreme Court
Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. United Transportation Union, 396 U.S. 142
(1969).
05-06-2016 | 05:49 AM
Otto
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
From: Turkish Pile Driver
We need to be precise in our terminology.
There is no contract violation here but there is a change in the status quo in violation of the Railway Labor Act.
Changes to "working conditions" do not have to be contract violations.
There's a ton of case law on that exact point.
The company could do this if we weren't in section 6. But we are.
There is no contract violation here but there is a change in the status quo in violation of the Railway Labor Act.
Changes to "working conditions" do not have to be contract violations.
There's a ton of case law on that exact point.
The company could do this if we weren't in section 6. But we are.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
