Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

newKnow 05-11-2010 07:51 AM


Originally Posted by iaflyer (Post 809793)
The DOT approved the request, it just requires Delta and USAir to sell a percentage of the slots. I think he's saying that Delta is going to use the slots the DOT approved in the swap, and sue for the rest.

Sounds like a good plan. Take what you got from them and fight for what you wanted.

Cycle Pilot 05-11-2010 07:56 AM


Originally Posted by FrankCobretti (Post 809766)
I ride on commuters from DCA to LGA and back all the time. It's seamless.

Ya, but you don't ride between LGA and CVG "all the time." The flights are almost all RJ's and you have a ton of displaced Comair pilots and flight attendants commuting to NYC. I commute from the West Coast and I flew with a Captain who lives in Cincinnati. He had to leave the same time I did from California! It looks like they added some mainline flights for the Summer, though. That should help out.

Sink r8 05-11-2010 08:12 AM


Originally Posted by newKnow (Post 809797)
Sounds like a good plan. Take what you got from them and fight for what you wanted.

Maybe. But you're actually suggesting we do something we're not approved to do (swap slots without meeting the terms of the approval). It's a little like refusing to go to the back of the bus, I guess. Forcing the issue in this manner is definitely a tactic. I don't think I've seen airlines use this approach (fly without approval first, sue later), at least not with the government. But I suppose it could be done.

rahc 05-11-2010 08:22 AM


Originally Posted by FrankCobretti (Post 809766)
I ride on commuters from DCA to LGA and back all the time. It's seamless.

It's a little different when you have an hourly shuttle that has less than a 50% load factor for a commute. Typical RJ commutes are not that friendly.

johnso29 05-11-2010 08:24 AM


Originally Posted by rahc (Post 809820)
It's a little different when you have an hourly shuttle that has less than a 50% load factor for a commute. Typical RJ commutes are not that friendly.


No, especially CRJ-100/200's. Getting the jumpseat on those is next to impossible. You have a better chance of getting a seat on the wing.

newKnow 05-11-2010 08:30 AM


Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 809812)
Maybe. But you're actually suggesting we do something we're not approved to do (swap slots without meeting the terms of the approval). It's a little like refusing to go to the back of the bus, I guess. Forcing the issue in this manner is definitely a tactic. I don't think I've seen airlines use this approach (fly without approval first, sue later), at least not with the government. But I suppose it could be done.

Oh wait. Maybe I misunderstood. I thought we were only talking about using the slots we were approved for, then suing for the ones we weren't. My bad. :eek:

Nosmo King 05-11-2010 08:37 AM


Originally Posted by Ferd149 (Post 809795)
Sink......exactly right.

Also, I'll add that your release and our old release are wayyyyy different and you don't know what you don't know. Once I saw yours and how little was on it, I understood why you wondered why we wanted 2. Our old one was like a "cliff notes" of the flight plan and a quick easy reference........also great scratch paper:D

I kept one just for $hits and grins and showed it to the RP we had coming home from CDG. He was blown away with it and also how "clean" and organized a World Flight flight plan was.

No worries, this time next year........we'll all be wondering what the big deal was:cool:

Ferd

Excellent summary, I may have to put up a webpage with a replica of the old Worldflight release and Flight Plan to make things clearer. Now I have to see if I saved one from a transpac or a south of NRT trip.

BTW Ferd, one of the things I noticed after requesting a copy of the ICAO strip is that we now file TAS in the Pacific. fNW we used to file mach number. This is not apparent under AWABS/FPS because the actual ICAO filed text is not printed like it was on the Worldflight release.

acl65pilot 05-11-2010 08:46 AM


Originally Posted by iaflyer (Post 809793)
The DOT approved the request, it just requires Delta and USAir to sell a percentage of the slots. I think he's saying that Delta is going to use the slots the DOT approved in the swap, and sue for the rest.

Hm - I read part of the DOT's response and you are correct. The wavier is contigent on Delta and USAir meeting the requirements. Regulations.gov

I guess Delta is going to announce the service, get everything lined up and see what happens. It's possible that they might ask for an injunction against the selling of the slots, while they sue. This way, they can use the slots. It takes time to get the flights in the system, get people to buy tickets, build the walkway between the old USAir terminal and the Delta terminal.

Kind of what I was thinking. Who knows though.

Ferd149 05-11-2010 09:28 AM


Originally Posted by Nosmo King (Post 809835)
Excellent summary, I may have to put up a webpage with a replica of the old Worldflight release and Flight Plan to make things clearer. Now I have to see if I saved one from a transpac or a south of NRT trip.

BTW Ferd, one of the things I noticed after requesting a copy of the ICAO strip is that we now file TAS in the Pacific. fNW we used to file mach number. This is not apparent under AWABS/FPS because the actual ICAO filed text is not printed like it was on the Worldflight release.

NKing.......

I printed one off the LMS. It offers you one so you could compare it to the FPS 2.0 while you were going through Phase 6. I just printed the release and the Flight Plan, the NOTAMS, WX etc isn't that different. The bad news is the one on the LMS is for a domestic flight. But, the ICAO strip would be the same.

Interesting about TAS vs mach #.......another thing I didn't see/understand. I guess Cost Index corresponds to TAS somehow? Since we were so over block time coming home last week, they gave us a constant mach (.80) all the way home. Made life sooooooo much easier.

Ferd

FrankCobretti 05-11-2010 09:38 AM


Originally Posted by rahc (Post 809820)
It's a little different when you have an hourly shuttle that has less than a 50% load factor for a commute. Typical RJ commutes are not that friendly.

Ah, well, that explains it. Here all this time, I've been reading people wanking about commuting and thinking, "What's the problem?"


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:45 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands