![]() |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 814036)
NW was not Delta. They had a very static route system and basing situation unlike Delta. I don't think you would ever get marketing to commit to a system that required basing and flying forcasts on a monthly basis. Comparing the requirements and what is involved in staffing a airline from the old NW to the new Delta is not really valid. A monthly bid is basically unworkable when you have the degree of change we have going on. Its fine when you are replacing retired pilots and adding a few block hours here and there.
Your point in red is exactally why DAL needs the monthly APA system. It allows the company much more flexiblity in moving people and expanding or contracting positions which Delta seems to do a lot more than NWA did. Lets say that tomorrow DAL discovers the need to dramatically downsize SEA base and increase JFK because some bean counter really fouled things up. Would you want to do it now or wait until Sep/Aug because that is the next AE. Just saying that a monthly tweaking seems to allow more flexibility than 3 times a year does and would also give guys a better idea of what they can do rather than shooting in the dark alot. Each position had a viewable list of who was bidding the position along with displacements if there were any. We did the AE thing before we got APA just like you guys do now. Having done both systems I vote for APA. Trust me you would like the monthly gig.;) |
My view (since we all seem to be giving the APA a discussion today) is that I wouldn't like an APA-style system. Here's why:
First - it gives marketing too much ability to tweak stuff. "Oh, we're short two FOs over here, we have 6 extra Captains here". Sometimes at companies, if you give someone the ability to constantly micromanage something, they will. I think the AE system forces marketing and flight ops to plan ahead, which is nice since our lifestyle and pay depends on it. ;-) Second, from my view of APA (from a far, I've never flown under it) from talking with my NWA buddies, it results in a near-constant status of training. Some guys over at NWA haven't gone to a recurrent class in years, because they keep moving back and forth between equipment. Personally, I don't want to head to MSP or ATL twice a year for weeks at a time. Third, the company does have the ability to run many AEs per year. They don't need to wait for a certain month, from what I understand. The reason there are less is that there is more training in each one. The only reason there is DTW777 on this bid is that the schoolhouse could only handle the amount of training that was on the last one. |
One of the biggest reasons that I liked the APA system is that you knew when you would be going to training.
I don't care what system we are using, as long as they have upward movement.:) |
Originally Posted by 944Turbo
(Post 813920)
Thanks! You get to move up 1, too!
Roughly 23 in front and 19 behind me |
Originally Posted by Nosmo King
(Post 814011)
The DC-9 leaks like the Titanic :rolleyes:
You ARE the King, brother! Quote of the Month for that one. The DC-9 windows and side panels look like a freakin salmon ladder when it rains. Not enough paper on the plane to stop it anymore since galley wipes went the way of progress. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 814038)
Close. It is when a pilot junior to you converts. Period.
22.12.4 A pilot who loses his 24.E.10. return rights 180 days after SOC will receive pay protection under the following conditions: a) The pilot will receive the difference between the payrate of the highest position his seniority entitles him to hold and the payrate for the highest paying position for which he lost his 24.E.10. return rights. b) The pay protection will cease at the earlier of: 1) the conversion of a pilot junior to such pilot to a category with a payrate which is equal to or higher than the payrate for the 24.E.10. category, provided the award was the result of a vacancy posting awarded after SOC, or 2) 36 bid periods plus 180 days following SOC. Note: A pilot will not lose this pay protection if he was under a category freeze incurred prior to SOC Thanks for the response ACL, I know I drive you crazy with them at times. |
Originally Posted by Nosmo King
(Post 814011)
The DC-9 leaks like the Titanic :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 814016)
Terminal 6??? But I'ze getz scared down in that tunnel :D
|
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 814088)
Yeah, its weird isn't it? I always feel like I'm walking the Long Green Mile to the chair, when I go down there.l:eek:
I'm guessing a mural... Cheers George |
I forgot to bid MSP 7ER. :(
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:42 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands