Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

scambo1 02-06-2011 04:57 AM


Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy (Post 942891)
Carl, I think that is an EXCELLENT national philosophy. What Capt. Moak just said was, "If you, Delta ALPA, sell out scope for higher pay rates then your contract is focused 'solely on self-interests and will inevitably lower the high standards that this union has established for eight decades and in the end hurt all of us.'" How true!

What's not to like about that? By my line of thinking, any contract that increases outsourcing to the lowest bidder violates his objective, and thus he has offered national level resources to ensure the greater good for the entire profession. Anyone who thinks the greater good rests with more outsourcing to the lowest bidder is wrong; and no where in his statement does he indicate that is his purpose. Similarly, any regional contract that tries to undermine a fellow regional is also focused "solely on self-interests and will inevitably lower the high standards that this union has established for eight decades and in the end hurt all of us" and thus, is also, against national ALPA policy.


PG;

LM cannot help but to be a breath of fresh air leadership-wise from our two previous Nat'l Chairs - two absolute disasters IMO.

You have repeatedly sounded the trumpet that higher payrates are unsustainable at least not C2K (forget COLA).

My guess is you are just trying to counter Carl because he posted one side of the spectrum's opinion.

The truth is, LM's quote was vague enough that it could be taken many ways. The greater good of the profession is certainly difficult to nail down - who's agenda is going to be GREATER in a good way?

Pineapple Guy 02-06-2011 05:04 AM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 942900)
PG;

LM cannot help but to be a breath of fresh air leadership-wise from our two previous Nat'l Chairs - two absolute disasters IMO.

You have repeatedly sounded the trumpet that higher payrates are unsustainable at least not C2K (forget COLA).

Actually, that's not true. What I have said, and still believe, is that absent our fellow pilots doing their part instead of thumping their chests, it is unsustainable for Delta pilots pay rates to be 50+% above the industry average. We can be at the top, even some percentage above the next competitor, but not 50%.


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 942900)
My guess is you are just trying to counter Carl because he posted one side of the spectrum's opinion.

The truth is, LM's quote was vague enough that it could be taken many ways. The greater good of the profession is certainly difficult to nail down - who's agenda is going to be GREATER in a good way?

Only the biggest cynic would believe what many here seem to believe: that somehow it is in ALPA National's interest for flying to be transferred from higher wage paying (and dues paying) pilot groups to lower wage (and dues) paying pilot groups. I simply try to counter that illogical argument every time it comes up.

Columbia 02-06-2011 05:14 AM


Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy (Post 942891)
What's not to like about that? By my line of thinking, any contract that increases outsourcing to the lowest bidder violates his objective, and thus he has offered national level resources to ensure the greater good for the entire profession. Anyone who thinks the greater good rests with more outsourcing to the lowest bidder is wrong; and no where in his statement does he indicate that is his purpose. Similarly, any regional contract that tries to undermine a fellow regional is also focused "solely on self-interests and will inevitably lower the high standards that this union has established for eight decades and in the end hurt all of us" and thus, is also, against national ALPA policy.

OK, no more increased outsourcing as it undermines collective bargaining efforts at the majors. Also, no more undercutting of one another at the regionals in an effort to take flying away from fellow regionals. How about going a bit further? What if CAL/UAL, for example, were to not only stop increased outsourcing, but in fact reduce it or "take it back" to CALs 50-seat level at the expense of their regional partners and subsequently cause many regional pilots to lose jobs? This in turn would give those regionals with looser scope to then undermine the now higher CASM 50-seat UAL/CAL regionals.
In other words, isn't taking it back from the regionals as undermining as giving it out? In SuperSunday terms, a good defense is necessary to stop the advance, however, you need to ultimately advance the ball in the other direction to win. Football isn't a zero sum game.

Too Tall 02-06-2011 05:15 AM

Question for those with more reserve know how than me, I have a PR partial payback day tomorrow Mon, and I'm on an X day today. That means I'm off until my partial pay back day ends tomorrow at 18:55 then back to long call correct? Thanks in advance.

Carl Spackler 02-06-2011 05:29 AM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 942900)
The truth is, LM's quote was vague enough that it could be taken many ways. The greater good of the profession is certainly difficult to nail down - who's agenda is going to be GREATER in a good way?

I think the evidence is clear that Moak thinks any attempt to regain outsourced flying by the majors is a change in the status quo, and as such, will be fought by national.

But the main point is that Moak believes ALPA national has the right and the obligation to determine what a local's contract should be as it relates to the rest of the industry's "greater good." This is the most revealing and troubling part. He unwittingly lays out the truth for everyone to see. The truth is that local leadership does not negotiate their own contracts. ALPA national provides all the money and the vast majority of the resources. Lee just said that ALPA national's highest priority in collective bargaining is to use those resources at national to ENSURE that local contracts benefit the "greater good."

Carl

Check Essential 02-06-2011 06:08 AM


Originally Posted by Too Tall (Post 942906)
Question for those with more reserve know how than me, I have a PR partial payback day tomorrow Mon, and I'm on an X day today. That means I'm off until my partial pay back day ends tomorrow at 18:55 then back to long call correct? Thanks in advance.

You are correct but don't forget you still have a required "schedule check".

A partial day is just like an X day. Only the end time is different so the traditional 1500 schedule check time is different also.
The deadline for crew scheduling to put something on your line is 9 hours prior to the end of the PB day and the deadline for for the schedule check is 2 hours after your payback day ends.

The earliest you could be required to report or start short call is 5 hours after your PB day ends.

The rules are the same as any "last X day". Its just that midnight is not the magic hour.

Kinda confusing but I hope that was helpful.

flh57 02-06-2011 06:09 AM

My niece is looking for a job with the TSA. On their website it shows pay scales reaching $155,500 per year. Toll collecter making $90,000 per year. If we don't get a hugh payraise then we need better negotiaters.

Check Essential 02-06-2011 06:16 AM

Its Super Bowl Sunday. We need some cheerleaders or something.

How about some Pam?


iaflyer 02-06-2011 06:19 AM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 942732)

What's odd? This is just a picture from the Madrid overnight.
The older guy in the middle is obviously an ER Captain with his young FA girlfriend (on the left). The guy on the right is a junior FO on the ER with his Cougar FA girlfriend. I mean, they ARE wearing Red Dresses - jeesh guys. You can't tell from the angle of the shot, but they are wearing their Sub Commander suits. ;)

The guy in the middle? The gay FA that everyone gets along with.

Columbia 02-06-2011 06:32 AM


Originally Posted by flh57 (Post 942927)
My niece is looking for a job with the TSA. On their website it shows pay scales reaching $155,500 per year. Toll collecter making $90,000 per year. If we don't get a hugh payraise then we need better negotiaters.

Unions Head for Showdown With Senate Over TSA Representation - FoxNews.com


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:49 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands