Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
I don't consider you or I as a back door entrant to the new Delta. I was hired in the early 80's at a time when almost nobody was hiring after a grueling interview process and three day physical at the Mayo Clinic. I'm sure your process was something similar. That process is important if you want to fly for a major - all you have to do is get through it.
No I can't. When it comes to the decision of entering into a corporate merger, that is entirely the purview of the board of directors. Not the union, and not some line pilot.
You seem to think there's another choice. There isn't. Unions don't decide if there will be a corporate merger, or who you will merge with.
Of course our union would represent any pilot group that management decided to merge with.
That'd be great. After I won the lawsuit, my proceeds and back pay would have made for one wonderful paid vacation. But your loathing of senior pilots is starting show...again.
In my first five years at the major airline business, I was furloughed 5 times. No furlough pay, no COBRA benefits, no union help. That's the way it was back then. You don't forget that. You prepare yourself for starting over at any time. You never consider this job permanent. At least I've never been able to.
Carl
You seem to think there's another choice. There isn't. Unions don't decide if there will be a corporate merger, or who you will merge with.
Of course our union would represent any pilot group that management decided to merge with.
In my first five years at the major airline business, I was furloughed 5 times. No furlough pay, no COBRA benefits, no union help. That's the way it was back then. You don't forget that. You prepare yourself for starting over at any time. You never consider this job permanent. At least I've never been able to.
Carl
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Ummm...really? Source? Sounds like an emotional response to me Mesabah...
I think SWA is a great choice of airline to work for and now they set the bar...I highly doubt many Legacy pilots desire to start at the bottom of a SWA/AirTran seniority list. Those famous 6 year upgrades are LONG gone!!
However, please feel free to "educate" me!!
I think SWA is a great choice of airline to work for and now they set the bar...I highly doubt many Legacy pilots desire to start at the bottom of a SWA/AirTran seniority list. Those famous 6 year upgrades are LONG gone!!
However, please feel free to "educate" me!!
No, I wouldn't expect a Delta guy that has been there for 10 years or more to apply to SW, but 10 year pay at delta is 3rd year pay at southwest. Perhaps the employees at Southwest are just saying this out of arrogance, I don't know.
You will see this disparity go away in the next Delta contract beginning 1 Jan 2013. As has been stated many times before, prior to 9/11 Delta's wage structure significantly exceeded SWA's pay scales as well as many others. With the merger complete and $1.4 Billion in profit in 2010 this will be the next step.
On Reserve
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
What happened with Delta Air Elite that caused them to violate your contract?
No.
Uh oh...
Oh yeah! Well you're a.......you're a.......conversational racist and poopy-head!
I believe no such thing. Almost every pilot in America IS represented, and that is a must in our business. You're starting to lose me here Bar...
What prejudice is that? Prejudiced against something you wrongly accuse me of believing? I've NEVER said every regional pilot has applied with a major and was turned down. What I DID say is that "most people like Mesabah (a CRJ700 Captain) have likely applied to the majors and didn't get on for whatever reason."
I don't mind you trying to slam me Bar, but at least try not to blatantly put words into my cyber-mouth.
Carl
Uh oh...
Oh yeah! Well you're a.......you're a.......conversational racist and poopy-head!

I don't mind you trying to slam me Bar, but at least try not to blatantly put words into my cyber-mouth.
Carl
- As the regionals became majors (including Southwest and Republic) their pay and working conditions have improved to the point for many people there is no financial pay back for having to start over ... (for instance, as your contract and equipment stood in 2007, the numbers said there was scant difference between NWA and staying put at my regional)
Carl
The most economically viable plan (and thus the most likely to succeed) is in our merger and fragmentation policies. We could have simply flushed the NWA pilots (as your Reps accused us of trying to do). Aren't you glad your union provided you the same representation it did Delta pilots?
You've been having White Russians for breakfast...haven't you.
Carl
You will see this disparity go away in the next Delta contract beginning 1 Jan 2013. As has been stated many times before, prior to 9/11 Delta's wage structure significantly exceeded SWA's pay scales as well as many others. With the merger complete and $1.4 Billion in profit in 2010 this will be the next step.
Carl
Bullplop. But to give you the floor, please explain to me how you feel that going to a LGBP system is automatically a paycut to Timbo.. I guess there is the possibility if we keep the same old 12 year pay scale.. which is retarded anyway... but please.. enlighten me how this is a given that he would be taking a paycut.
We have 34 airplanes (777 and 747) at the top of the pay scale. Out of 742 (according to APC). That means 4.5% of our pilots are at the top of the pay scale. Under a longevity system, that means your seniority number would have to be roughly in the top 4.5% (#559 out of 12,200) to equal that pay. Yet, we have guys with seniority number of 2200+ on the 777.
As for my thoughts overall on longevity pay, several things come to mind:
1) You're not producing any more revenue for DAL just because you've been here longer, so the economic case to be made is tougher. Longevity based pay is also how ALPA ends up with $70,000/yr secretaries, which you acknowledge is ridiculous, as do I.
2) By removing a significant incentive for moving to different aircraft, you have the effect of flattening the seniority on each aircraft, and thereby reducing your options from a quality of life perspective. It would be like we have 1-2 different categories and that is it. Whereas now, a pilot with a seniority of, for example, 2000, has the choice of:
a) Super senior on the M88
b) Senior on the M88
c) Average seniority on the 767
d) Not too senior on the 764
e) Junior but able to hold the 777
So this pilot has almost limitless choices to pick just the right mix of quality of life, trips, and pay. Eliminate the pay differential, and you basically only have domestic and international as a choice, and with DAL mixing categories even that gets blurred.
Meaning, when you first get hired, you can count on 5 years of reserve, followed by 5 years of moderate seniority as an F/O, followed by 5 years of good seniority as an F/O or reserve as a Captain. Then same once you make Captain. Under the current system, if willing to stay on a small aircraft, you can be very senior fairly quickly. That option disappears under longevity based pay. That's my primary problem with it.
Bigot is such a strong word with so many racial undertones...
---->Bigotry: stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own.
How about "dogmatic" to describe Carl?
---->Dogmatic: asserting opinions in a doctrinaire or arrogant manner; opinionated.
---->Bigotry: stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own.
How about "dogmatic" to describe Carl?
---->Dogmatic: asserting opinions in a doctrinaire or arrogant manner; opinionated.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




