Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Be careful out there. A few weeks ago, I had a scheduling supervisor rip me apart on the phone, dock my pay, and try to get me in all kinds of trouble over something that would have been a non-event up until recently. Scheduling these days seems to be taking a very "we're trying to find any way we can to nail you on a technicality" approach to dealing with us. I'm really thankful for a great Chief Pilot with common sense. But FYI... be very careful with commuting and with deviating from deadhead.
Since they always follow the contract, I see no reason icrew shouldn't show us the same info they are looking at. I'm not really sure why guys on res are given so little info as to what is going on, except that it gives you the fear of the unknown.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
But Pineapple knows of a DAL FO who made $200K last year so in actuality, SWA is underpaid.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: SLC ERB
Any way you can elaborate on this a little without exposing yourself? Personally, I think the new deviate from deadhead policies are worthless. Scheduling can DH me on DCI to my base, but they can't send me home on DCI? They will PS to suit their needs, but there has to be seats available to suit my needs? If there are seats available, I can nonrev. This policy is worthless!

I'm not quite sure why Delta doesn't have this policy. I mean, what's a Skywest, or a Mesaba, or a Republic going to say - If you don't give our employees priority on DCI flights, were not going to fly for you? Yeah right.
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 18
I agree, but for slightly different reasons - DCI flights arent just code shares on another airline - they are subcontracted Delta flights. In other words, Delta pays these airlines to fly these flights, tells them when to fly these flight, handles all reservations, and owns all of the seats. We, as Delta employees should therefore n bhave rights to seats these flights as if they were mainline. We should have priority over their employees on these flights and we should be able to book PS on these flights.
I'm not quite sure why Delta doesn't have this policy. I mean, what's a Skywest, or a Mesaba, or a Republic going to say - If you don't give our employees priority on DCI flights, were not going to fly for you? Yeah right.
I'm not quite sure why Delta doesn't have this policy. I mean, what's a Skywest, or a Mesaba, or a Republic going to say - If you don't give our employees priority on DCI flights, were not going to fly for you? Yeah right.
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: SLC ERB
Edit: Ok, I looked it up - Skywest and ASA employees have priority over mainline employees on Skywest and ASA flights respectively. On other DCI flights we travel at the same priority code as their employees on their DCI flights. To me, neither of these policies are acceptable.
Last edited by Dash8widget; 07-14-2011 at 01:41 PM. Reason: Updated info
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Delta Air Lines Inc.
saw an uptick in passengers in April and carried more total system passengers than any other U.S. airline, the U.S. Department of Transportation
's Bureau of Transportation Statistics reported Thursday.
The Atlanta-based carrier had about 9.8 million passengers in April, up 3 percent from April 2010. Delta is the second busiets airline at Piedmont Triad International Airport, behind only US Airways.
U.S. airlines combined carried 60.5 million scheduled domestic and international passengers in April -- up 1.4 percent from April 2010. The April 2011 passenger total was also 1.7 percent above that of two years ago in April 2009 but remained 4.3 percent below the early recession level of April 2008, BTS noted.
Harstfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport was the busiest airport in April with 3.6 million passengers coming through -- up 1 percent over April 2010.
The Atlanta-based carrier had about 9.8 million passengers in April, up 3 percent from April 2010. Delta is the second busiets airline at Piedmont Triad International Airport, behind only US Airways.
U.S. airlines combined carried 60.5 million scheduled domestic and international passengers in April -- up 1.4 percent from April 2010. The April 2011 passenger total was also 1.7 percent above that of two years ago in April 2009 but remained 4.3 percent below the early recession level of April 2008, BTS noted.
Harstfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport was the busiest airport in April with 3.6 million passengers coming through -- up 1 percent over April 2010.
It's the very foundation of the DPA. It's their number one goal without peer. Without ALPA's purposeful weakness on scope, there would be no DPA.
Carl
So when I travel as a nonrev on a Delta flight operated by Skywest, I have priority over any Skywest employee on that flight? Is this a recent change? I admit, it's been about a year and a half since I've been a regular commuter on DCI flights but I remember many a Skywest employee boarding before me. Maybe the agents in SLC didn't get the memo?
You know, we can't non-rev on charters (except when they're empty on repositioning) and aren't we in fact chartering these DCI planes to carry our passengers? Using that idea, we would essentially be part of the chartering group and should have higher priority on all seats. Think anyone would go for that??
Bravo Sierra.
The scope language NWALPA had in place forbade the sale of Compass until a suitable DC-9 replacement for the mainline was flying (at least 10 hulls).
By removing that restriction, which did NOT occur until the JCBA, DALPA willingly facilitated the sale of Compass. We had language that directly controlled the disposition of that company...which is as close as "owning" the flying as you get without actually doing the flying, and it was given away by people who had NOT given up any negotiating capital to get it.
Nu
The scope language NWALPA had in place forbade the sale of Compass until a suitable DC-9 replacement for the mainline was flying (at least 10 hulls).
By removing that restriction, which did NOT occur until the JCBA, DALPA willingly facilitated the sale of Compass. We had language that directly controlled the disposition of that company...which is as close as "owning" the flying as you get without actually doing the flying, and it was given away by people who had NOT given up any negotiating capital to get it.
Nu
Carl
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




