Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 08-10-2011 | 04:30 PM
  #73391  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
If Delta opens with a concessionary offer, I'm going to treat this job as a stepping stone to UPS, Fedex, or Southwest. There is no reason why ANYONE cannot expect us to get some sort of raise after everything we've been through.
Hockey,

I think it's obvious that right now the grass is greener at those airlines. But, you can't forget that grass never stays green. Sometimes, the grass gets scorched by the sun, or dries up, or gets torched, cut, infested, (you know what I.m getting at).

The bottom line is that no airline has ever been on top forever. Jumping ship right now might work out, but it might not. Ask my bid who jumped ship in 1999 from NWA to go to United. Delta is a good place to be right now. We might just have to duke it out to get to where we need to be, that's all. Things will get better.


Hows that for a pep talk?
Old 08-10-2011 | 04:39 PM
  #73392  
nwaf16dude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
From: 737A
Default

Originally Posted by PilotFrog
I bet it will really throw everyone for a loop if they actually open with something decent. I'm not even going to try and describe something decent, but it would be funny.
Our "constructive engagement" strategy is supposed to get us a decent contract in minimum time without a big fight, right? We'll get a major indication of how much management appreciates our cooperation when we see their opener.
Old 08-10-2011 | 04:55 PM
  #73393  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
I had a captain a few days ago greet the passengers as they were deplaning. Problem was he was still wearing his baseball cap. What's with guys wearing ball caps while flying in a shirt and tie? The guy looked like an idiot when he didn't take it off in passenger view.
I use the David Clark headset. The metal adjustment thingy will pull out what's left of my hair, therefore I wear a ball cap. That, and if you have ever stood up too fast and hit your head on the CB panel, you will know that it can leave a mark.. sometimes a liquid red one. That being said, I take it off when saying bye bye...
Old 08-10-2011 | 05:02 PM
  #73394  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg
Apply the same methodology used to constrain and lock down the JV to domestic codeshare...

-Departures
-Seatmiles/kilometers
-Block Hours
-Production Balance
etc.

We have some guys with great ideas for the wide-body international stuff.
I wish we could convince them that their ideas are just as important and relevant for the domestic stuff.

Cheers
George

George;

My TIC non apologist post may not have translated well.

I completely agree with you.

Why no quid pro quo with any of the domestic code/outsource? Oh yeah we have no furlough language. Until...(pick your disaster)

AK codeshare flying is solid mid seniority flying, they are growing like a weed, recalling furloughees and hiring. We are...thinking about an aircraft order...pulling down some int'l... moving sims (think decreased training capacity for some period of time)...I dont know, its a good job.

equal pay for equal work? How about equal work for equal work?
Old 08-10-2011 | 05:56 PM
  #73395  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by groundstop
The worse part is ALPA gave them permission to do it.
Originally Posted by TheManager
Actions like that just keep the DPA snowball moving downhill. Its the intransigence on the FPL resolutions that get that snowball rolling as opposed to just moving.

Wait until the MEC get the upcoming block representation resolutions. Avalanche.
Good job groundstop. Post an unfounded rumor.

Manager, you disappoint. I find you to be one of the more "rational" (though I still disagree most of the time) DPA fans, to latch on to such a baseless comment and take it as some sort of truth isn't very logical.

Leave your gripes with ALPA in areas where problems actually exist, don't join the soccer hooligans just because it's fun to riot.
Old 08-10-2011 | 06:12 PM
  #73396  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg
Last year I had a Maddog with a big yellow sticker on the logbook:

Aircraft under warranty, overhauled by Aeromexico.

I'm guessing TechOps has their plate full and is concentrating on their major revenue centers like 75/76 overhaul...
AFAIK TechOps is a profit center.

Cheers
George
Tech Ops does Engine MRO and makes a killing at it. We outsource the heavy maintenance to other MRO shops so we can make the big money on engines.

767's go to HKG...
Old 08-10-2011 | 06:24 PM
  #73397  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
I would be pleasantly surprised. But I'm expecting the usual company excrement in the opener. Not like anyone has played this game before or anything. If you don't expect it, you haven't been in this industry for too long.
I bet they will open with a paycut disguised as a raise. Something like "increases of up to 40%" which of course will only be 5ish% per year partial cost of living adjustments, a few minor improvements here and there, and a few net concessionary things here and there. They will then count on the media, watercooler talk among other employee groups and even pilot apologists to parrot the "40% raise" lie. This is basic freshman airline management 101 straight from their oldest playbook. As a bonus, doesn't RA does work with one of the federal reserve branches/board of governers? Either way, he knows very well how inflationatory policy is used as a hidden tax to siphon wealth away from those who earn it, retroactively and across the board.

This goes so far beyond "restoration" as a general concept or "back in my day you could buy a Cadillac with a month's pay" or whatever. Forget high water marks of a different era and let's take all the emotion like that out of it and focus on what we know to be reasonably true, right here, right now.

Is it absolutely essential that we:

1. take note of the full and complete increase in cost of living, which is far in excess of the bogus "official" CPI numbers which exclude food and energy, which are, by far, the biggest inflationary cost pressures to most of us when it comes to how much to look for in a COLA, therefore we MUST:

2. back that number OUT of any claim of a "raise" over the life of the agreement AND:

3. Demand instant SWA per pilot small narrowbody W-2 parity, plus a premium for our massive additional revenue and higher per pilot revenue, plus a premium for our massive scope relief for flat out whole product outsourcing, plus a premium for our massive code share partnership relief, plus a premium for widebody flying above all that in proportion.

4. Back out every penny at or below SWA per pilot W-2 from being in the same room as the word "raise" or "increase" especially "over the life of" nonsense. If it takes 35% to get SWA parity and on day one we get 40%, we got a 5% raise. If we get 5% per year for 5 years, that is, at best, a zero percent raise, as the trillions we are printing out of thin air, including compounded interest costs which are also being printed out of thin air, will at least equal that (and likely more). But we have to start with a number at some point, so a negative 5% erosion, compounder per year, at a minimum, should statistically be backed out of any and all "raise" claims in additon to backing out 100% of every penny it takes to just equal SWA.

5. Only discuss money in excess of SWA AND in excess of a coumpounded 5% per year as a "raise" both initially and over the live of C12K.

6. In the event that a company or union agreed upon offer, TA, proposal or even opener is less than above, it shall be referred to appropriately as a pay cut.

7. ALPA's esteemed EF&A needs to drastically recalculate its epic fail method of calculating/rationalizing positive "bargaining credits" for outsourcing to its proper metric, which is clearly a substantial negative wage and benefit pressure on a per pilot basis, which is the entire reason for outsourcing the core business of an airline to begin with when you give them relief in section one: to give management relief from sections 2 through infinity, which not only prevents jobs at YOUR airline/pilot group, but produces long lasting negative wage, benefit, retirement and work rule pressure at every level.

The hoodwinking is over for C12K. Partial COLA's are not raises. Partial restoration is not a raise. SWA parity is not a raise. SWA pay, SWA scope, premiums for widebody, premiums for our massive network/first class/travel infrastructure, SWA work rules at a minimum for narrowbody domestic (plus inprovement for reasons already mentioned) and once all of that is taken care of, then and only then can the "me too" nonsense even be allowed into the discussion. If the company says that is too expensive, the debate should automatically shift to the issue of management competency.

1. SWA pay
2. SWA scope
3. SWA profitability sure beats

1. outsource/shrink
2. ?
3. profits.
Old 08-10-2011 | 06:28 PM
  #73398  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
Manager, you disappoint. I find you to be one of the more "rational" (though I still disagree most of the time) DPA fans, to latch on to such a baseless comment and take it as some sort of truth isn't very logical.
Typical of your selective responses. Care to actually respond to what TheManager posted below that I've bolded?:

Originally Posted by TheManager
Actions like that just keep the DPA snowball moving downhill. Its the intransigence on the FPL resolutions that get that snowball rolling as opposed to just moving.
Are you saying that DALPA/ALPA has complied with the Council 20 FPL resolution on Flight Pay Loss?

Carl
Old 08-10-2011 | 06:42 PM
  #73399  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
I bet they will open with a paycut disguised as a raise. Something like "increases of up to 40%" which of course will only be 5ish% per year partial cost of living adjustments, a few minor improvements here and there, and a few net concessionary things here and there. They will then count on the media, watercooler talk among other employee groups and even pilot apologists to parrot the "40% raise" lie. This is basic freshman airline management 101 straight from their oldest playbook. As a bonus, doesn't RA does work with one of the federal reserve branches/board of governers? Either way, he knows very well how inflationatory policy is used as a hidden tax to siphon wealth away from those who earn it, retroactively and across the board.

This goes so far beyond "restoration" as a general concept or "back in my day you could buy a Cadillac with a month's pay" or whatever. Forget high water marks of a different era and let's take all the emotion like that out of it and focus on what we know to be reasonably true, right here, right now.

Is it absolutely essential that we:

1. take note of the full and complete increase in cost of living, which is far in excess of the bogus "official" CPI numbers which exclude food and energy, which are, by far, the biggest inflationary cost pressures to most of us when it comes to how much to look for in a COLA, therefore we MUST:

2. back that number OUT of any claim of a "raise" over the life of the agreement AND:

3. Demand instant SWA per pilot small narrowbody W-2 parity, plus a premium for our massive additional revenue and higher per pilot revenue, plus a premium for our massive scope relief for flat out whole product outsourcing, plus a premium for our massive code share partnership relief, plus a premium for widebody flying above all that in proportion.

4. Back out every penny at or below SWA per pilot W-2 from being in the same room as the word "raise" or "increase" especially "over the life of" nonsense. If it takes 35% to get SWA parity and on day one we get 40%, we got a 5% raise. If we get 5% per year for 5 years, that is, at best, a zero percent raise, as the trillions we are printing out of thin air, including compounded interest costs which are also being printed out of thin air, will at least equal that (and likely more). But we have to start with a number at some point, so a negative 5% erosion, compounder per year, at a minimum, should statistically be backed out of any and all "raise" claims in additon to backing out 100% of every penny it takes to just equal SWA.

5. Only discuss money in excess of SWA AND in excess of a coumpounded 5% per year as a "raise" both initially and over the live of C12K.

6. In the event that a company or union agreed upon offer, TA, proposal or even opener is less than above, it shall be referred to appropriately as a pay cut.

7. ALPA's esteemed EF&A needs to drastically recalculate its epic fail method of calculating/rationalizing positive "bargaining credits" for outsourcing to its proper metric, which is clearly a substantial negative wage and benefit pressure on a per pilot basis, which is the entire reason for outsourcing the core business of an airline to begin with when you give them relief in section one: to give management relief from sections 2 through infinity, which not only prevents jobs at YOUR airline/pilot group, but produces long lasting negative wage, benefit, retirement and work rule pressure at every level.

The hoodwinking is over for C12K. Partial COLA's are not raises. Partial restoration is not a raise. SWA parity is not a raise. SWA pay, SWA scope, premiums for widebody, premiums for our massive network/first class/travel infrastructure, SWA work rules at a minimum for narrowbody domestic (plus inprovement for reasons already mentioned) and once all of that is taken care of, then and only then can the "me too" nonsense even be allowed into the discussion. If the company says that is too expensive, the debate should automatically shift to the issue of management competency.

1. SWA pay
2. SWA scope
3. SWA profitability sure beats

1. outsource/shrink
2. ?
3. profits.

Gloopy;

Can I send this to my reps?
Old 08-10-2011 | 06:46 PM
  #73400  
georgetg's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
From: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
1. outsource/shrink
2. ?
3. profits.
Step 1. Collect underpants
Step 2. ?
Step 3. Profits

Nice SP reference Sir!

Cheers
George
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices