Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

gloopy 11-09-2011 05:31 PM


Originally Posted by Desperado (Post 1082540)
Wasn't it PG who was making a big deal about pilots who "choose" to commute. I'm thinking that the MEM based guys didn't get to make that "choice".

And neither will the many hundreds of other guys who see their life disrupted from this bid. Commuting is an absolute reality in this industry. It is not some eccentric lifestyle choice. And taking full advantage of a paid move every single time one is eligible for it would be way more expensive to the company than the occasional call in honest commuter.

acl65pilot 11-09-2011 05:33 PM


Originally Posted by ilinipilot (Post 1082613)
I think this bid and subsequent ones present the company and ALPA with a unique opportunity to help all us line pilots out who commute. I plan on asking JG tomorrow to form a committee to deal with commuting issues. I know its my choice to commute blah blah blah but some of us cannot live in base. For example military people, kids issues, babysitting issues, medical issues, cost issues all are reasons why guys cannot commute. So this is a time for the company, alpa, marketing, and scheduling to get together so show they care about the pilots.
Some ideas I have
1. survey the pilots again and the top bases with the most commuters make the lines 50% commutable.
2. provide free hotel rooms a night for pilots
3. find out where the most pilots commute to from that base and assign overnights in those cities to that base. ie a lot of ATL commuters will be from MEM so assign 320 trips with MEM overnights.
I know this will never happen but i believe it is in the best interest of the company to make commuting as painless as possible.
Dont forget just in time for summer the company is pulling seats out to put in econo comfort.
I for one am getting tired of hearing marketing drives this airline. There is no reason they cannot make our lives easier by swapping out fleets. in most of our cities we can interchange a 737, m88/90 and an airbus and we need to start doing that so our commuters are taken care of.
I

Marketing runs the airline, but hotel and crew costs are seeing as way too high. Eliminating 50% of the overnights in NYC saves this company tons of money.

Overnights in lets say ATL on the 320 will be next to nothing after this conversion window because they are moving time here. No layo, no trip rigs, equates to lower pilot cost. It is what is driving the base moves.

Just think of all of the credit time saved by moving the 330 to ATL. No more 12 day ATL-HNL trips. Now it is a 17.50 three day with no credit.

acl65pilot 11-09-2011 05:35 PM


Originally Posted by iaflyer (Post 1082615)
My guess? The company isn't sure about the economy. Although there are lots of issues right now (just check out the debate to hear a few), I think the price of oil is a biggy for airlines. Everytime there is a hint of the economy is doing better or we're getting out of the recession, oil jumps 20%. That makes air travel more expensive, airlines raise prices, less people travel. Rinse, repeat.

But you are correct, now is the time to interview if you want pilots to be in place for early summer 2012. I think I read somewhere that Delta wasn't expecting any growth for 2012, or actually a slight decrease in pilot hours. Thus, no need to hire.

It is why I wish RA would charge DC on one issue he mentions. Fuel costs, and the fact that domestic tickets have to have the fuel included in the tickets. We can not add a fuel surcharge on after the ticket price for domestic flights. We must do this. Every other industry can do this. Breaking out the fuel cost would be a major win for us.

Also no reason to hire if you are going to get a flow agreement with a big regional like is rumored on the DALPA forum! :eek:

gloopy 11-09-2011 05:36 PM


Originally Posted by One Taco (Post 1082511)
All the while I was dying to ask him just one question - why does Delta need CVG? Where does CVG fit into Delta's strategy? But, unfortunately in the course of his Q and A, he made it abundantly clear that he didn't know where the price of oil (and hence the state of our company) would be 6 months hence. So, the desire to ask my question naturally abated.

CVG is probably on the way out, but there is one glimmer of hope for it staying. As we get 100 more 737's, the CVG 737 base, which is also supposedly a mini 737 MX base as well, will likely see more 737 traffic through it. Its hard for anywhere to be a base when mainline flying gets to a certain level and that flying is shared with 3 or 4 other mainline planes. The MD88 base there is probably gone regardless though. The 737 base has a (less than half) chance of surviving. Just a WAG.

iaflyer 11-09-2011 05:39 PM


Originally Posted by ilinipilot (Post 1082613)
show they care about the pilots.
Some ideas I have
1. survey the pilots again and the top bases with the most commuters make the lines 50% commutable.
2. provide free hotel rooms a night for pilots
3. find out where the most pilots commute to from that base and assign overnights in those cities to that base. ie a lot of ATL commuters will be from MEM so assign 320 trips with MEM overnights.
I know this will never happen but i believe it is in the best interest of the company to make commuting as painless as possible.
Dont forget just in time for summer the company is pulling seats out to put in econo comfort.
I for one am getting tired of hearing marketing drives this airline. There is no reason they cannot make our lives easier by swapping out fleets. in most of our cities we can interchange a 737, m88/90 and an airbus and we need to start doing that so our commuters are taken care of.
I

I live in base, and choose not to commute to a base with better trips. What are you going to ask the company for those who aren't commuters?

Here are some ideas:
Maybe a cab service from my house so I don't have to make the 30 minute drive back and forth.
Free hotel room in base once in a while for a night on the town with the spouse, with per diem of course
Special crew room for non-commuters so commuters don't use up all the chairs sleeping from their commute.

But seriously, there are people at this airline who don't commute. I imagine you're frustrated but by asking for special treatment, you're taking stuff away from those who live in base.

hoserpilot 11-09-2011 05:40 PM


Originally Posted by ilinipilot (Post 1082613)
I think this bid and subsequent ones present the company and ALPA with a unique opportunity to help all us line pilots out who commute. I plan on asking JG tomorrow to form a committee to deal with commuting issues. I know its my choice to commute blah blah blah but some of us cannot live in base. For example military people, kids issues, babysitting issues, medical issues, cost issues all are reasons why guys cannot commute. So this is a time for the company, alpa, marketing, and scheduling to get together so show they care about the pilots.
Some ideas I have
1. survey the pilots again and the top bases with the most commuters make the lines 50% commutable.
2. provide free hotel rooms a night for pilots
3. find out where the most pilots commute to from that base and assign overnights in those cities to that base. ie a lot of ATL commuters will be from MEM so assign 320 trips with MEM overnights.
I know this will never happen but i believe it is in the best interest of the company to make commuting as painless as possible.
Dont forget just in time for summer the company is pulling seats out to put in econo comfort.
I for one am getting tired of hearing marketing drives this airline. There is no reason they cannot make our lives easier by swapping out fleets. in most of our cities we can interchange a 737, m88/90 and an airbus and we need to start doing that so our commuters are taken care of.
I



I live in base and LOVE commutable trips. I like to start late on day one and finish early on the last day. Unfortunately for a commuter I would be taking a trip that would benefit them as well. Do you see the problem here???:):)

TenYearsGone 11-09-2011 05:42 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 1082614)
TYG;
Think of the reasons why.

Possible reasons we can delay hiring:
-Shrinking
-Merger or Acquisition
-FT/DT will allow less pilots
-Productivity changes will make us more efficient
-Trip Parking, and yes, it is on the rise esp in the WB categories.
-No one retiring
-By not hiring, when they need to hire they will be able to claim duress and beg for scope relief. (We can't hire that many, we must outsource jobs to keep the network intact)

Just naming possibilities.

ACL, I know...I was hoping you would not say something so pessimistic. And more importantly, I was hoping ALPA, which I know has the plan at hand, can help mitigate this BS maneuver by the company


Originally Posted by iaflyer (Post 1082615)
My guess? The company isn't sure about the economy. Although there are lots of issues right now (just check out the debate to hear a few), I think the price of oil is a biggy for airlines. Everytime there is a hint of the economy is doing better or we're getting out of the recession, oil jumps 20%. That makes air travel more expensive, airlines raise prices, less people travel. Rinse, repeat.

But you are correct, now is the time to interview if you want pilots to be in place for early summer 2012. I think I read somewhere that Delta wasn't expecting any growth for 2012, or actually a slight decrease in pilot hours. Thus, no need to hire.

The cost of oil is just the price you have to pay to be in business. It should not be of concern to me or any other pilots. UAL/CAL is expanding, DAL is implying-->Shrinkage. OIL is high for UAL/CAL, Alaska, KLM/AF, PCL and Hawaiian too; but somehow they are flying our routes and we are paying them,,hmmmm

TEN

Bucking Bar 11-09-2011 05:42 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1082545)
And we'll know that how Bar?

Carl

Carl, you have forgotten your history over the last decade. The Comair and ASA pilots wanted scope which bound Delta Air Lines. ALPA said "no, the only party at the table with Delta Air Lines is, and ever will be, Delta pilots." When the Comair and ASA pilots sued ALPA defended the right of the Delta pilots to bargain exclusively with their management.

The DPA's false allegations against straw men will do nothing to advance the contract or careers of Delta pilots. Delta pilots have been subjected to ten years of crap by people like you who want to rally the troops against our brothers. As stated so well by a former NWA pilot at a C44 meeting "NWA pilots did not get date of hire, stop telling us fixing scope will result in Comair pilots getting date of hire." (I laughed and clapped as did most of the room)

Blaming others for our problems is tired. We (and you) must take responsibility for our contract.

TenYearsGone 11-09-2011 05:45 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 1082614)
TYG;
Think of the reasons why.

Possible reasons we can delay hiring:
-Shrinking
-Merger or Acquisition
-FT/DT will allow less pilots
-Productivity changes will make us more efficient
-Trip Parking, and yes, it is on the rise esp in the WB categories.
-No one retiring
-By not hiring, when they need to hire they will be able to claim duress and beg for scope relief. (We can't hire that many, we must outsource jobs to keep the network intact)

Just naming possibilities.

BAD BIZ CHOICE! We should not give any relief!

TEN

acl65pilot 11-09-2011 05:49 PM


Originally Posted by iaflyer (Post 1082623)
I live in base, and choose not to commute to a base with better trips. What are you going to ask the company for those who aren't commuters?

Here are some ideas:
Maybe a cab service from my house so I don't have to make the 30 minute drive back and forth.
Free hotel room in base once in a while for a night on the town with the spouse, with per diem of course
Special crew room for non-commuters so commuters don't use up all the chairs sleeping from their commute.

But seriously, there are people at this airline who don't commute. I imagine you're frustrated but by asking for special treatment, you're taking stuff away from those who live in base.

I don't commute because I am lucky enough or stupid enough to have moved from a former base. Some are not that lucky. I know a few guys that were told by their Mrs. You can move but you will be doing it as a single man. They commute.

I think the best thing we can do is make the commuting policy contractual, and if someone needs it every trip so be it.

Some of us may be forced out of base on this AE, and become involuntary commuters. You were once one, but the merger provided a base within driving distance of your house. That is like winning the lottery. Many are not that lucky, and therefore, it is my opinion that we as a pilot group need to do something for the commuters. I do not care how much you sugar coat a commute, it sucks. Hotel rooms, probably not, but a good commuter clause and a little better trip construction would go a long way.

Many should have thought of that and filled out the scheduling rotation construction survey.

BTW, if I get bumped on this AE, and end up in another base, I cannot move. My house has lost over 150K and value. I am stuck. I will be a commuter out of necessity. Making 4K more a month as a line holder in another base is reason enough to deal with the commute than to take a 1.5K a month paycut on lower equipment.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands