![]() |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 632523)
Super,
I totally agree that "IF" the no furlough provisions are kept in their current form, they will hold up. They are spelled out very clearly. Currently the word is still no furloughs, but an important point is that they have not come out this time around and stated this as a, matter of fact. They are closely looking at our staffing needs and how they relate to three different Flight Plans going forward. If the way they have priced tickets for this weekend and the loads are any indication, we will just have to come up with a new model to forecast with. I bet many of the commuters coming out of Dallas would have like a few more 757's this summer. |
All the kids just got out of school. Flights are always full this time of year. Most of May they were empty. Also keep in mind that the load a flight carries does not relate to the profit it makes. Marketing can fill every flight if they desire. The balance is how you fill the seat at a price point that is profitable. Yields are down 20 percent from last year. Absent a yield improvement the rest of the year is not going to be great. Break even at best. Had there not been major capacity reductions yields would be much lower this summer.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 632408)
I'm sorry, I don't understand your point. The guy I was addressing was saying that basically a big "RJ" was beneath him, and it is since he can now (most likely) hold a pseudo-(not really a)widebody airplane. So he wants to throw all the young guys under the bridge. I can't wait to fly with HIM... :rolleyes:
I was supporting your argument by adding that if the the -190 rates are $20 less than what the -9 is, it can't be that objectionable because thats what the -9 got paid last year. Ok. Now I confused myself. :D |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 632592)
Most of May they were empty. Also keep in mind that the load a flight carries does not relate to the profit it makes. Marketing can fill every flight if they desire. The balance is how you fill the seat at a price point that is profitable.
|
Originally Posted by Gladioslave
(Post 632554)
Thanks. They do it every month huh? How do they know what is req'd? You could get moved down at any month?
|
DAL COUNCIL 44 MEETING NOTICE
DATE: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 TIME: 10:30 a.m.– 2:00 p.m. PLACE: DoubleTree Club Hotel ATL Airport 400 Norman Berry Drive Atlanta, GA 30344 (404) 763-1600 Council 44 will pay for parking at this hotel for the LEC meeting. AGENDA: 1. Officer Reports 2. Old Business - Approval of Meeting Minutes 3. New Business - Master Chairman and Supreme Leader Lee Moak - MEC Negotiating Committee Update - MEC Training Committee - Scope Brief Resolution (see attached PDF) Proxy Form Attached and Allowed for the Scope Resolution and Approval of Meeting Minutes. Any thoughts about the pending meeting? Scheduling just called so I'm flying. :( |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 632636)
DAL COUNCIL 44 MEETING NOTICE
DATE: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 TIME: 10:30 a.m.– 2:00 p.m. PLACE: DoubleTree Club Hotel ATL Airport 400 Norman Berry Drive Atlanta, GA 30344 (404) 763-1600 Council 44 will pay for parking at this hotel for the LEC meeting. AGENDA: 1. Officer Reports 2. Old Business - Approval of Meeting Minutes 3. New Business - Master Chairman and Supreme Leader Lee Moak - MEC Negotiating Committee Update - MEC Training Committee - Scope Brief Resolution (see attached PDF) Proxy Form Attached and Allowed for the Scope Resolution and Approval of Meeting Minutes. Any thoughts about the pending meeting? Scheduling just called so I'm flying. :( |
Sounds like a conspiracy! The Company is flying all the Scope Hawks to keep them from voting!
TIC |
Originally Posted by Superpilot92
(Post 632642)
What was the pdf on the scope resolution?
SOURCE: Armando Gomez PROPOSED RESOLUTION: WHEREAS the scope language in Section 1 of the Delta Pilot Working Agreement (PWA) binds Delta Air Lines to the Delta pilots and the Delta PWA, and WHEREAS Section 1 of the Delta Pilot Working Agreement states, “Except as provided in Sections 1 D, E, N, O, and Q: All flying performed by or for the Company or any affiliate will be performed by pilots in accordance with the terms and conditions of this PWA,” and WHEREAS there have been several modifications to the Delta Pilot Working Agreement over several contracts, with subsequent agreements expanding the amount of Delta flying performed by other than Delta pilots, and WHEREAS the pilots of Council 44 wish to monitor the effectiveness of Section 1 in protecting Delta pilot jobs, and WHEREAS the pilots of Council 44 desire transparency on the level of outsourcing of Delta flying, and WHEREAS it is in the best interest of the pilots of Council 44 that they have reliable and current data from their council in order to form opinions on the effectiveness of Section 1 in protecting Delta pilot jobs, as opposed to rumors and speculation, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Council 44 request the Council 44 representatives brief Council 44 on the history of scope at DAL at the next scheduled LEC 44 meeting. This brief should, to the greatest extent possible, contain an explanation of scope language and changes to scope language since the 1986 Delta Pilot Working Agreement, as well as year by year information on the numbers and types of aircraft operated by our Connection carriers, numbers and types of aircraft operated by the mainline, as well as block hours, ASMs, revenue carried, or other information the Council 44 representatives feel is appropriate, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Council 44 request the Council 44 representatives to provide periodic updates on our code-share agreements to the council, to include to the greatest extent possible: 1) The number and type of aircraft engaged in Category A and C operations limited under the language of Sections 1D4, 1D5, and 1D6. 2) The number of block hours, ASMs, departures, and revenue attributed to Category A and C operations. 3) The current percentages, number of seats, or number of flights limited under the language of Sections 1E2a, 1E2b, 1E2c, 1E2d, and 1E8. 4) The current and historic number of block hours flown under the company’s “Joint Venture” with Air France/KLM and limited under the language of Section 1P. 5) The current number and types of aircraft in the Delta mainline fleet. 6) The number of pilots employed and DOH of the most junior captain at Delta Air Lines. Or any other data the Council 44 representatives feel is appropriate so that the pilots of Council 44 can determine the effectiveness of Section 1 in protecting Delta pilot jobs and careers, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Council 44 direct its representatives report to the Council 44 pilots actions taken on the above resolution in a timely manner.
Originally Posted by satchip
(Post 632643)
Sounds like a conspiracy! The Company is flying all the Scope Hawks to keep them from voting!
TIC Actually, all kidding aside, who are we fighting to get Compass combined and strengthen scope? The Company or the Union :mad: or both? Sometimes I feel as if the company would let us have E175s if we fought for em, maybe I'm wrong. |
Originally Posted by satchip
(Post 632643)
Sounds like a conspiracy! The Company is flying all the Scope Hawks to keep them from voting!
TIC The Company could care even less than our union does about those of us who seek scope restoration. If anything, our own flight operations management pulls for their team. What many people don't get is that there is a disconnect between what our flight operations management wants and what they get from the highest levels of Company leadership. In effect our flight operations management is not a whole lot different than flight operations management at any of our regional competitors. They hope we get flying and grow. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:55 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands