![]() |
Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
(Post 1141965)
How true...I was something back in 89:cool: ...flyin' vipers, hanging out at Tommy Condon's, drinking kamikazes, I thought I owned the world.
|
The early out won't be attractive to most of the very senior FA's. They all do 11 hour day turns, sleep at home every night, no luggage, spend nothing while at work, and take home 50k after taxes working one week a month at most. Full medical/ dental and passes. All holidays/ weekends off. 6 weeks of paid vacation per year and sick days. So it might be more accurate to say they work one week every two months. The ultimate part time job! Nobody would quit that. If the company was truly interested in culling the top of the FA list, they'd stop building 11 hour one day trips.
|
Originally Posted by ITSALLGOOD
(Post 1141966)
Can someone clarify for me...I know there is a limit on the 70+ strs at dci, but 50 strs are unlimited?? As dal puts a 1st class in some 70 strs, does that drop them into the unlimited category, circumventing the intent of the scope language to cap larger rjs??
No the 70 seater was certified at 70 seats and DAL put a FC in. It does not change the number at all. |
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 1141961)
No, it means we need the pilots now...
Cheaper easier to hire a new guy to fill a seat in a small jet later this year, than to displace off the big ones and have displacements ripple through the system. This is a "hedge" to have bodies in the right place without cranking up the hiring machine, but there will be a price paid for that type of insurance... Cheers George yeah except the guidance for the upcoming AE is displacements down to cover small jet stuff so they just keep kicking themselves with training because they keep underestimating who's going to bid what. Instead of hire to cover the bottom stuff they'd rather displace down and ripple the training cycles only to have to retrain guys going back up next year? these guys are doing it ass backwards...:rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 1141961)
No, it means we need the pilots now...
Cheaper easier to hire a new guy to fill a seat in a small jet later this year, than to displace off the big ones and have displacements ripple through the system. This is a "hedge" to have bodies in the right place without cranking up the hiring machine, but there will be a price paid for that type of insurance... Cheers George Airlines never do it that way for many reasons. Biggest one is when the time comes that we do need that many pilots, they are in a "emergency" situation and one in which relief from the pilots will help. They have already stated that they cannot hire the number needed in the peak years. Granted that is a decade away, but thinning the numbers out, or preemptive hiring makes the most sense. There are not going to be a ton of qualified pilots out there when the time comes. We may be doing the Capt thing the way they do in Asia, with a 200 hr wonder kid next to us in a 700,000 lb jet!! :eek: |
Originally Posted by DAWGS
(Post 1141952)
I know many here are watching all the hiring overseas. I've already told the wife, depending on this next contract, we may be moving in the next few years. I never would have thought I would consider leaving my country for a job elsewhere after being hired at Delta. The US aviation industry is going to be in a world of hurt soon if management, ATA and our government don't get a clue.
|
Originally Posted by Superpilot92
(Post 1141993)
yeah except the guidance for the upcoming AE is displacements down to cover small jet stuff so they just keep kicking themselves with training because they keep underestimating who's going to bid what. Instead of hire to cover the bottom stuff they'd rather displace down and ripple the training cycles only to have to retrain guys going back up next year? these guys are doing it ass backwards...:rolleyes:
Furthermore, if we are the airline that buys Kelly's 717's it makes more sense to create a long and short program to the jet and have everyone propositioned on the 88. Sucky, but reality. This is the only bid they can really do this with. Waiting until fall means that they will need to start working on 2013 and 2014 staffing were the WB flying will be a lot more even than we are seeing now. |
nevermind...
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1141934)
Or Hawaiian......
Wait, we used to fly nonstop from MSP to HNL, but then dropped it, so obviously there aren't enough people in Minnesota or the upper Midwest that want to go to Hawaii. Nope, not enough. |
Originally Posted by freightguy
(Post 1141997)
Same here! If contract 2012 does not restore our pay, I'm out the door as well. In fact, I have some gigs short-listed already... each of them pays more than twice what I'm making now at Delta. There all a lot of opportunities out there. In fact, if the management wants to try furlough to scare us, I say BRING IT ON! In fact, I would be delighted. But I won't give a single concession on scope nor would settle for anything less than restoration of my 40% paycut.
That is exactly what a lot of the pilots telling me they are looking are saying. There are even some junior capts looking at bailing if this contract does not restore a lot of this career. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:13 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands