Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Flamer 02-27-2012 04:18 PM


Originally Posted by Doug Masters (Post 1142119)
A 1.2 billion dollar profit and SWA paying 52% more than our -88 rate should be a game changer

I don't remember seeing those statistics in the contract comparison.

acl65pilot 02-27-2012 04:27 PM


Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg (Post 1142083)
I saw an ALPA rep yesterday in the ATL airport (he identified himself and said he was going to DC for upcoming meetings). I asked him about the upcoming contract and possible raises and he stated "AMR has changed the game." I actually put him in his place saying "We already have done things in our BK that AMR has yet to do (PBS, loss of pensions, etc), and our airline is also nowhere close to AA in terms of losses. Our airline has done VERY well." He tried to back track of course, saying "Of course, of course" but I told him stearnly that the DPA was catching on, and if this future TA is weak, he should expect to go back to the line full time." He didn't like that, but I think he got the picture.


Would love to know what Rep was going to DC for a meeting yesterday. Special meeting was last week, and the regular one is next week in ATL. Last special meeting was in ATL. The DC meeting was two meetings ago, unless this is something else that does not surround the MEC business. :rolleyes:

AMR does change some of the game, not our side, but the companies. Fact is that they are asking for what?, 350 million for their pilots. PBS saves a heck a lot more than that. Their term sheet will probably save AMR at least 1.5-1.8 billion in job losses, efficiencies in scheduling, and worse hotels, not to mention scope. Ergo, it does not change it that much.

I give AMR about a 25% chance of leaving intact without a merger. They need a business plan, and thus far what we seeing is not sustainable imo. They know it too and will beg for an extension on March 29th.

acl65pilot 02-27-2012 04:31 PM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1142104)
Interesting angle, I hadn't though to that one.

But I still wonder how much of a short course it would be. Best case I would guess would be like a 320 to 330 type of a program. That's all well and good, but it would still be a new category that would generate multipile system wide rebids regardless of freezes.

Add in the self imposed training onslaught just to "save" a few clicks on the pay scale for a year or so before another self imposed training onslaught just in time for the big retirement wave and it really makes you go hmmmmmmm.

HI and AS wouldn't generate much if any capacity pull down. Not enough to even make a dent in imminent hiring anyway.

Large pieces of AA, USAir and/or JB on the other hand, would represent a golden opportunity to slaughter our seniority list by adding capacity just to dump large portions of it and taking the bulk out of DL pilot's careers.

Either that or there's some serious 4th floor giddiness over potential future cabotage in one form or another.

That is my concern. It must be good for the pilots here and generate growth period. If it fails in that regard, pay or any other quid means little.

A bad SLI and we will see pilots bailing from their current projections to the left seat.

Simply put, they got to get it right.

acl65pilot 02-27-2012 04:33 PM


Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1142110)
I still don't see why anyone would lobby for relief from the 1500 hours on the civilian side. That won't help meet demand at all and in fact will actually serve to hurt demand. Even 1000 means the vast majority will have to instruct for a while (750ish hours), likely at the university level. But it creates self imposed brain drain at an earlier point at the very programs that are being used to justify the lower mins.

If they kept it 1500 for civie FO candidates, it would guarantee that not only the university programs but also the other 141 and 61 schools would be able to get more instructing out of pilots before they lose them. The problem is getting qualified pilots into and through the pipeline, not getting them hired soon enough. Cannibalizing the CFI's sooner just to appease the RAA spastic "by any means necessary" mentality for covering flights means fewer instructors with less experience to train an increasing demand for new pilots. That was some of the dumbest airline lobbying I think I've ever seen.

That extra 500 hours is nothing and will happen in a matter of a few months yet would allow each CFI to train more future pilots, which will be necessary to cover not only "normal" attrition/wash out rates the profession at that stage has always seen, but poor return on investment generated attrition if the career doesn't start to improve.

Some of the colleges probably lobbied for it on the assumption that it will be a huge selling point to new pilots. But being able to skip 500 hours that someone else is paying you to get and that you will build in a few months is a very small carrot that probably isn't going to justify the enormously higher costs commonly associated with those types of schools in the first place.


FWIW, the RAA, and ATA were pushing no change in the cutout. They wanted a 250 hr waiver for any 141/142 school. 750 is a far cry from that. Perfect, heck no, but the other side wanted no change. It is a 300% increase for those pilots.

sailingfun 02-27-2012 04:46 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1142155)
Sailingfun! Welcome back. I know you probably forgot, but there was a pending question to you from the floor when you last left us. For review, here it is again:





Wouldn't want you to forget.

Carl

Sorry Carl, I never saw the question. I don't read every post. I have however many times posted my thoughts on scope. In fact had you bothered to look you would have noted I made a post with my thoughts on scope just two days ago. I believe and always have believed the E170/175 is a mainline aircraft and belongs at the mainline. I was very vocal when John Malone a DPA organizer gave that aircraft up to DCI in LOA 46. We should work in the coming contract to bring that aircraft back to the mainline and sunset those contracts. I don't think we can produce a economic case to operate the smaller DCI aircraft at the mainline however we should not allow additional airframes in the under 70 seat category beyond what is currently in the contract.


Now Carl, Back to my question? Which Rep, Which Base?

forgot to bid 02-27-2012 05:36 PM

I ran into a Fedex MD11A friend today at Costco. He is just finishing LCA training and has his first OE coming up for a new hire placed directly into ANC MD11. Btw, he has 17 years seniority there.

Thought I'd pass that years of service along for comparison and contrast.

forgot to bid 02-27-2012 05:37 PM

http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3571/3...870_z.jpg?zz=1

http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/ai...7400Flarge.jpg

TenYearsGone 02-27-2012 05:46 PM

Ok, Ill bite.

"There is no money in Cargo???":confused:

TEN

TenYearsGone 02-27-2012 05:47 PM


Originally Posted by Superpilot92 (Post 1142198)

Super,

Is that Gary Busy?

TEN

FlyZ 02-27-2012 06:20 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1142203)
I ran into a Fedex MD11A friend today at Costco. He is just finishing LCA training and has his first OE coming up for a new hire placed directly into ANC MD11. Btw, he has 17 years seniority there.

Thought I'd pass that years of service along for comparison and contrast.

A friend who started at SWA just before I started here (about 4 years ago) grossed $16,000 last month. Not even working that hard. Please pass that on to the captains you fly with. How many years at Delta would that take right now? 15? 20? And he is flying a 737. All domestic. How long until openers?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:52 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands