![]() |
Originally Posted by more bacon
(Post 1144696)
art (and acl, for that matter), you don't need to convince me. You're preaching to the choir. Please get your dalpa buddies on board with the above statement. Large pay increases, huge qol improvements, or a blend...show me the money.
Dpa is waiting in the wings. well stated. Bravo! |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1144687)
I think my difficulty with pay banding is that it really puts the cart (pay) before the horse (scope). Without ironclad (adequate) scope, I think pay banding is a bad idea. With ironclad scope (Delta seniority list pilots fly delta passengers. period) I think it is not so bad an idea and workable, but also not perfectly optimal.
That said, merger, fragmentation, acquisition language would have to be updated in a similarly ironclad way. In our seniority based world, it will always be worse to be junior than to be senior. Pay banding doesn't necessarily lower the ladder down to the junior any more than productivity pay pulls the ladder up. All it does is encourage the senior to fly the type of trips/aircraft they prefer to fly and the junior get what's left. That's my brief take on the whole thing. |
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
(Post 1144689)
Sampras (AKA Carl) is on his way to a grand slam on center court. McEnroe is going back and forth between crying and yelling in the corner.
|
At least we're convinced enough of an impending pilot shortage that PFT arguments have dried up.
And a DC-9 dude works way harder than anyone. No auto-throttles. Need I say more? I'll take my money in non-sequential unmarked bills. Carry on. :-^ :-v :-^ :-v :-^ :-v :-^ :-v |
Originally Posted by More Bacon
(Post 1144696)
Art (and ACL, for that matter), you don't need to convince me. You're preaching to the choir. Please get your DALPA buddies on board with the above statement. Large pay increases, huge QOL improvements, or a blend...SHOW ME THE MONEY.
DPA is waiting in the wings. |
Originally Posted by Seaslap8
(Post 1144760)
DPA is waiting in the wings to do what exactly?...and how are they going to do it?
The real question is, what is ALPA going to do on this contract to earn the irrational bennies they've been enjoying since BK? BK was a bloodbath for line pilots. But not for DALPA's inner circle. Are you familiar with their obscene FPL and stipend allowances? Have you seen DALPA's expenses (on our dime) from their FL, and other boondoggles? Of course you have. Every single Delta pilot I've spoken to on the jumpseat or in the hotel van realizes that DPA is not going to happen on this contract. But every single one will vote to boot ALPA if this contract is insufficient. Argue all you want, get as personal as you like, but that's the way it is. Show me the money. |
Originally Posted by Doug Masters
(Post 1144737)
I disagree. I, along with many others, are waiting to see how ALPA does on this contract. If they deliver whats expected, then I will be proud of my MEC and my union. If not, then the DPA has my support.
If DALPA delivers, DPA will fade into nothingness. Having said that....based on the pathetic and utterly counterproductive downward management we've seen from DALPA waterboys on this (and the DALPA) boards, I'm not holding my breath. Meanwhile, I'm upping my contributions to DPA. |
Originally Posted by More Bacon
(Post 1144763)
Whatever they do, they'll do it better, cheaper, and more efficiently than ALPA. They'll have every single cent of Delta dues money dedicated to Delta pilots. They will not fund a bloated, self-serving, and corrupt bureaucracy at national. And they WILL NOT subsidize/advocate for regional pilot groups who are trying to take our jobs and erode our quality of life. They will hire the best legal and other assistance whose ONLY interests are those of Delta pilots. All of that by itself is enough to sell me. Everything else is gravy.
The real question is, what is ALPA going to do on this contract to earn the irrational bennies they've been enjoying since BK? BK was a bloodbath for line pilots. But not for DALPA's inner circle. Are you familiar with their obscene FPL and stipend allowances? Have you seen DALPA's expenses (on our dime) from their FL, and other boondoggles? Of course you have. I'm wasting my time responding to your drivel. You have been outed as a DALPA functionary with plenty to lose from DALPA's ouster. $6,500/mo housing allowance for the President, $4,500/mo housing allowance for V.P.s, $1,600/mo car allowance, $498,000 annual compensation for the President, $120,000/year secretaries, $175,000/year magazine editors, massive bonus pensions, $329 per night hotel rooms, $260 per day per diem, etc. |
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
(Post 1144770)
$6,500/mo housing allowance for the President, $4,500/mo housing allowance for V.P.s, $1,600/mo car allowance, $498,000 annual compensation for the President, $120,000/year secretaries, $175,000/year magazine editors, massive bonus pensions, $329 per night hotel rooms, $260 per day per diem, etc.
|
Originally Posted by Gomerglideslope
(Post 1144751)
I agree, scope and pay (in that order) are first priority...and while you are correct, seniority will always be king, I think the pay banding model can open up aircraft to junior pilots that may not otherwise be open to them. It also can increase QOL if in some circumstances it removes the impetus to commute to a higher paying category.
The only thing that increases QOL is seniority. Everything else is relative. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:55 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands