Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2012 | 05:11 PM
  #95181  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
There used to be a thread for this rhetoric.
Asked and answered. The mods are part of the rethoric. What do you expect the judgment to be?

Overruled.
Old 04-08-2012 | 05:13 PM
  #95182  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
and

and

and

and


All on one page! It's like reading (a smarter version of) Bacon's stuff.

You started out with a great question. Then you jump right into the full sales pitch with the next sentence. I'd like an answer before get all "alternative union" on this beotch.

I was trying to be implicit that I'm for positive change away from the current establishment MEC unelected types. I, like you, would prefer to not go nuclear and have change from within.

I was trying to convey that the arrogant manner that the establishment types talk down to the people they are supposed to be serving is why we're in this "alternate" drive in the first place. Logic before emotion.
Old 04-08-2012 | 05:13 PM
  #95183  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
The "facts" you and alpha posted were not facts. They were at best misinformed conjecture.

The "fact" is that you're so stuck in your ways that you can't see anything that is outside of the box.
Then dispute the facts with numbers, not rhetoric.
Old 04-08-2012 | 05:15 PM
  #95184  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Please reread the opener on Section 1, a portion posted here:

Improve protections for domestic and international codeshare
Improve balance of flying between Delta and DCI
Change the definition of “permitted aircraft type” to include propeller and geared turbo-fan aircraft

Add new language to restrict the use of permitted and non-permitted aircraft within holding companies


Change the definition of “permitted aircraft type” to include propeller and geared turbo-fan aircraft


Allowing more efficient geared turbofan aircraft and propeller aircraft without the current seat limit doesn't seem like reeling in DCI to me.
Old 04-08-2012 | 05:18 PM
  #95185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
I was trying to be implicit that I'm for positive change away from the current establishment MEC unelected types. I, like you, would prefer to not go nuclear and have change from within.

I was trying to convey that the arrogant manner that the establishment types talk down to the people they are supposed to be serving is why we're in this "alternate" drive in the first place. Logic before emotion.
Agreed fully on the part in bold. As for the next sentence, I agree that some come across this way. We had a rep replaced that spoke that way, all the time, even though I think his heart was actually in the right place. Took out another rep that was deemed guilty by association (so to speak).

I think any union is about 1/3 brilliant technocrats/lifers, 1/3 entrenched/self-serving technocrats, 1/3 cycling through and doing their best.
Old 04-08-2012 | 05:20 PM
  #95186  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Then dispute the facts with numbers, not rhetoric.
Alpha's numbers were quickly shown to be wrong, yet you supported him and even half way tried to argue his invalid point. Why??
Old 04-08-2012 | 05:30 PM
  #95187  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." John Adams, 'Argument in Defense of the Soldiers in the Boston Massacre Trials,' December 1770

I'm all for a better way to run things. Show me one and convince me that it works. I'll be with you, and won't even throw rocks from the sidelines. Otherwise, I'll stick with the plan that has put more money in pilot pockets.
Ironic that someone would quote John Adams to support tyranny.

The Delta MEC supposes the Delta pilots are too stupid and uninformed to know what is best for them. For the most part, I suppose the MEC is correct.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 04-08-2012 at 05:41 PM.
Old 04-08-2012 | 05:33 PM
  #95188  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Asked and answered. The mods are part of the rethoric. What do you expect the judgment to be?

Overruled.
I tried over and over and over again to keep the DPA/DALPA thing out of this thread, but it was rarely assisted.

I guess I'm doing things right when I'm accused by the DPA people of being biased for DALPA and vice versa by the DALPA people.
Old 04-08-2012 | 05:37 PM
  #95189  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Change the definition of “permitted aircraft type” to include propeller and geared turbo-fan aircraft


Allowing more efficient geared turbofan aircraft and propeller aircraft without the current seat limit doesn't seem like reeling in DCI to me.
If the definition were changed over 50 seat aircraft like the Q400 or new generation follow-on would count against the permitted aircraft limit. Right now as long as they're under the gross weight limit they don't.

It is definitely a tightening of scope.
Old 04-08-2012 | 05:42 PM
  #95190  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
If the definition were changed over 50 seat aircraft like the Q400 or new generation follow-on would count against the permitted aircraft limit. Right now as long as they're under the gross weight limit they don't.

It is definitely a tightening of scope.
This is correct.

The lines that you bolded from the opener are what are so incredibly vague that they are of little substance.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices