Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2014 | 06:36 PM
  #1121  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
Just about everybody who is familiar and/or has firsthand experience with CDO's knows that most pilots do not sleep during the day and that they plan on getting their sleep during the break between flights at the hotel on the CDO. Just because there's not some study or statistic to support it, doesn't mean it's not a fact.
Perhaps with your own experience, this is the case. That doesn't make it the case with the majority though. I know pilots that have done an entire month of CDOs, and they most certainly did sleep during the day. CDOs have been done for years, and been done safely. That doesn't mean I want them at DAL, but it does mean that your stance on this issue is lacking factual support.
Reply
Old 08-29-2014 | 06:37 PM
  #1122  
Hillbilly's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 972
Likes: 1
From: 7ERA
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
That's sure right Ed, but don't forget they are just as scrupulous in ignoring data that would highlight our leverage. Leaving out our JV foreign competitors in contract comparisons for example.

The question I have is why? There's no question they're doing it, but why is the key. Are they doing it because they really do have an accurate pulse of the pilot group majority and this is what Delta pilots want in their union? Or is there another reason our union behaves this way?

Carl
Did the AF or KLM pilot unions give permission this time around? I asked last time around about this issue and was told that both groups provided info to the MEC on the condition that it not be published. Much of their benefits structure was government controlled as I recall and I was told that complicated apples to apples comparisons as well.

I didn't realize they had given permission this time around and that the Neg Com had ignored it. Where did you get that info? Or is that not entirely true?
Reply
Old 08-30-2014 | 04:51 AM
  #1123  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by Hillbilly
Did the AF or KLM pilot unions give permission this time around? I asked last time around about this issue and was told that both groups provided info to the MEC on the condition that it not be published. Much of their benefits structure was government controlled as I recall and I was told that complicated apples to apples comparisons as well.

I didn't realize they had given permission this time around and that the Neg Com had ignored it. Where did you get that info? Or is that not entirely true?
If you were the union and you had the official contract information, yet were asked not to publish it...okay. You are still the same union and you get the same information from open source channels (internet?). You can legally compare the two and publish the open source info with authority and legitimately be upholding the agreement not to publish the official information.

Withholding information from constituents is not lying, but it is also not exactly upholding your duty of fair representation either.
Reply
Old 08-30-2014 | 05:22 AM
  #1124  
Hillbilly's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 972
Likes: 1
From: 7ERA
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
If you were the union and you had the official contract information, yet were asked not to publish it...okay. You are still the same union and you get the same information from open source channels (internet?). You can legally compare the two and publish the open source info with authority and legitimately be upholding the agreement not to publish the official information.

Withholding information from constituents is not lying, but it is also not exactly upholding your duty of fair representation either.
I understand what you are saying. I would like to look at these open source versions of their pilot working agreements that are on the internet. I tried google and didn't see them. I found some third party sights with some "estimates" of what monthly salaries would be, although they were a couple of years old. No indication of where the salary estimates were derived from. Having salary numbers only wouldn't provide for a contract comparison anyway. I want to look at the whole enchilada. Where did you find them?
Reply
Old 08-30-2014 | 05:23 AM
  #1125  
Starcheck102's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: ATL 330 A
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Here's a typical cdo stretch, start Monday 1900 report, TVC cdo, get 7 hours of sleep, get home 0800. Don't sleep at all. Report Tuesday, 2045 report, ITH cdo, get 5 hours sleep, get home 0800, nap for 3 hours. Have the next two days off, and repeat this the entire month. Very rested, very safe.

You don't have a copy of the TA that produced LOA 14-01. There are significant differences between "CDOs" at your slave galley of an airline, and "SDPs" as defined by the TA.

C44 reps said they would have passed it except for a few items; they wanted a test period prior to allowing the program to become permanent, and they wanted SDPs to pay 8 hours (versus 7.5).

It looked like a good deal to me, and a much better use of my time than spending thirty hours in MKC. I hope they come back with the C44 suggestions attached plus a few other protections.
Reply
Old 08-30-2014 | 06:03 AM
  #1126  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by Starcheck102
You don't have a copy of the TA that produced LOA 14-01. There are significant differences between "CDOs" at your slave galley of an airline, and "SDPs" as defined by the TA.

C44 reps said they would have passed it except for a few items; they wanted a test period prior to allowing the program to become permanent, and they wanted SDPs to pay 8 hours (versus 7.5).

It looked like a good deal to me, and a much better use of my time than spending thirty hours in MKC. I hope they come back with the C44 suggestions attached plus a few other protections.
Oh I feel confident it will be back... as evidenced by the number of hard core DALPA supporters arguing in favor of it. Sounds to me like the company really wants these things, and by golly we've got to keep RA happy!

So we'll get them. The company will have their problem solved and, oh by the way, even though we know why you want to bid these, don't fly fatigued (wink, wink, nod, nod).
Reply
Old 08-30-2014 | 06:06 AM
  #1127  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
CDOs have been done for years, and been done safely.
Just because there hasn't been a mishap yet, doesn't mean they're being done "safely."
Reply
Old 08-30-2014 | 06:49 AM
  #1128  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

We should immediately ground all night cargo operations. There is no possible way they can be done safely when pilots have to sleep at home before coming into work and then flying multiple legs at night with breaks.
Reply
Old 08-30-2014 | 07:18 AM
  #1129  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
We should immediately ground all night cargo operations. There is no possible way they can be done safely when pilots have to sleep at home before coming into work and then flying multiple legs at night with breaks.
UPS 1354 Birmingham, AL.





Carl
Reply
Old 08-30-2014 | 07:31 AM
  #1130  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
UPS 1354 Birmingham, AL.





Carl
And the thousands of other weekly flights that occur without accident or incident? I suppose they've just been lucky for all of these years?

May they RIP.

Last edited by johnso29; 08-30-2014 at 07:41 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices