Notices

Details on Delta TA

Old 05-31-2015 | 03:53 PM
  #5281  
Snake
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Here's what you and your team don't understand: The reps control this process. The unelected MEC admins can squeal all they want, but they work at the behest of the reps. If the reps decide something in closed session needs to be communicated to those they represent, they get to decide. They're the bosses. Surely you get that?



You join APC this month and with nearly all of your 15 posts, you sing the same hymn that Sink r8, Professor, slowplay, sailingfun, shiznit, etc. are all singing. As you say, I'm just keeping you honest. You all have the right to your opinions, but your attempt to stifle communication is failing. Whatever agenda you're trying to push is suffering as a result. Just sayin.

Carl
Again with the association argument?

"They're the bosses" is as non sequitur as it gets. They also signed non-disclosure agreements.

Leaking confidential information is an abuse of trust, could get you investigated by the SEC, and only results in diminished transparency, low-ball proposals by the company, and getting parked at the NMB.

But you like it.
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 03:58 PM
  #5282  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
That's one weird athlete you got there. Did he suffer a head injury?
Since you were talking about plea bargaining, I thought you'd appreciate the athlete analogy.

Carl
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 04:50 PM
  #5283  
Big E 757's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 12
From: A320 Left seat
Default

Originally Posted by dalad
Exactly right Carl. Returning money to the investors is pure BS. RA and his minions are becoming quite wealthy with all this. The luster has completely worn off and we have an MEC with Stockholm Syndrome. The problem WE as pilots have is membership apathy. Nobody bothers to show up at LEC meetings, or even bother to vote in their LEC elections.
I pointed this out around a year ago, the self-serving nature of the quest for an S&P listing, stock buy backs, investment grade rating, and got a talking to by TSquare...it's a good thing you guys are bunky's up there in NYC.

Be careful next time he shows up at the crash pad Dalad, check his pockets before turning your back on him. I'm kidding, of course. I know he's harmless. Just likes a good debate.
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 05:02 PM
  #5284  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Undoubtedly management has re crunched their own numbers.



I agree. Management has crunched and dissected their own numbers, and our DALPA experts have crunched and dissected management's numbers.

Sure would be great if our union had independent economic and financial analysts.

Oh wait.

Carl
I guess the fact that ALPA's economic and financial analysts are considered the best there is for looking at the books in the airline industry has escaped you. They are so good they often get hired out as subcontractors for other accounting firms that dont have their expertise.
I do agree their numbers would be different then yours. Perhaps since you recently posted that not only was contract 2012 cost neutral but it funded all the other employees raises you might back that up with a few facts.
Please feel free to explain the following.
1. Pay raises of 20% for 80% of the pilot group and and around 27% for reserves. Cost in direct dollars close to 500 million a year.
2. Indirect raises in training and vacation.
3. When all the work rules were averaged together the jobs to block hour ratio remained the same so no real job loss to work rules.
4. Increase in retirement
5. Profit sharing hitting 16.8% last year for another 300 million to the pilots. Expected to be 19% to 20% this year for another 380 million to the pilot group.

Now Carl please feel free to post where the concessions are that added up to the 800 million additional pay dollars received in 2014 with substantially more due in 2015 and another 300 million to pay for the other employees improvements. Don't just post BS. Put some numbers out there and attach those numbers to contract changes. If your going to try and claim manning as some have post the block hours and number of pilots.
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 05:02 PM
  #5285  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by rube
Again with the association argument?
If you don't like the association, stop making it impossible to miss.

Originally Posted by rube
"They're the bosses" is as non sequitur as it gets. They also signed non-disclosure agreements.
NDA's signed were for protection of non-public info disclosed by Delta management. What's your point?

Originally Posted by rube
Leaking confidential information is an abuse of trust, could get you investigated by the SEC,
Oh, OK now I see where you're coming from. First, the SEC doesn't care about what the union discloses about itself. Second, if you didn't already know that, what non-public information about Delta has been released by anyone covered under that NDA.

Originally Posted by rube
and only results in diminished transparency, low-ball proposals by the company, and getting parked at the NMB.
I'll let others take this one. It's too easy.

Carl
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 05:42 PM
  #5286  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I guess the fact that ALPA's economic and financial analysts are considered the best there is for looking at the books in the airline industry has escaped you. They are so good they often get hired out as subcontractors for other accounting firms that dont have their expertise.
Believing your own press releases and PR is a recipe for being beaten by opponents.

Originally Posted by sailingfun
I do agree their numbers would be different then yours.
Yes, but would they be different THAN mine?

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Perhaps since you recently posted that not only was contract 2012 cost neutral but it funded all the other employees raises you might back that up with a few facts.
It's what Richard and Ed have said many times publicly and to lie about that would be problematic if not worse since they are directors of a public company.

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Please feel free to explain the following.
1. Pay raises of 20% for 80% of the pilot group and and around 27% for reserves. Cost in direct dollars close to 500 million a year.
2. Indirect raises in training and vacation.
3. When all the work rules were averaged together the jobs to block hour ratio remained the same so no real job loss to work rules.
4. Increase in retirement
5. Profit sharing hitting 16.8% last year for another 300 million to the pilots. Expected to be 19% to 20% this year for another 380 million to the pilot group.

Now Carl please feel free to post where the concessions are that added up to the 800 million additional pay dollars received in 2014 with substantially more due in 2015 and another 300 million to pay for the other employees improvements. Don't just post BS. Put some numbers out there and attach those numbers to contract changes. If your going to try and claim manning as some have post the block hours and number of pilots.
Two sides can explain what Richard and Ed meant when they said what they said. Richard and Ed don't seem to think they need to clarify. DALPA could release the costing sheets to show exactly how C2012 was either cost neutral or not. How it also funded initiatives to benefit OTHER employee groups at Delta, or not. DALPA refuses to release them.

Carl
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 06:09 PM
  #5287  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Do you honestly think those numbers have not been crunched again? I would bet they have not only been crunched but dissected by both sides!
Idk, sure seems like there are some on our side who would never want to recapture that scope and its convenient to hide behind numbers you'll never get to check.

Would you want CRJ900s and E175s here?
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 07:30 PM
  #5288  
Big E 757's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 12
From: A320 Left seat
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Idk, sure seems like there are some on our side who would never want to recapture that scope and its convenient to hide behind numbers you'll never get to check.

Would you want CRJ900s and E175s here?
I'm surprised we haven't heard any rumors about relaxing the 76 seat restriction on scope.

Doesn't Skywest have an order for 100 90-100 seat Mitsubishi or Canadair Jets? Doesn't our scope clause prohibit Delta from code sharing with a company that operates aircraft larger than our size limit, even if it's for a different airline? Based on what I understand about our Section 1, the minute Skywest takes delivery of their first 76+ seat aircraft! we no longer do business with them...unless the language changes.

My guess is there will be a subtle rewording of that provision in our contract, if it hasn't already been re-written. There was that Republic buying Frontier and owning Shuttle America (our code-share partner) debacle a few years ago.
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 07:30 PM
  #5289  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 0
From: Power top
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
Let me guess......Long time lurker upset with all the disinformation coming out and felt compelled to post.
Excellent analysis Deahhead, your ready to be the base First Officer management pilot, checking for hats.
Reply
Old 05-31-2015 | 07:52 PM
  #5290  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Any bets on a TA coming from the meeting this week?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices