Details on Delta TA
#7061
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
8%, .05 cents, :15 minutes of vacation, 1% DC in2017.
That is it. That is an epic fail.
The massive concessions are unnecessary and insulting.
Anyone who tries to.sell this is an enemy of our profession.
That is it. That is an epic fail.
The massive concessions are unnecessary and insulting.
Anyone who tries to.sell this is an enemy of our profession.
#7062
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
That 21.5% is in 2018. Just to be fair. Of the 14% THIS year, 5% of that is from the PS reduction. (I rounded down) The way I figure it, we are only getting an 8% pay increase this year, and the 21% pay increase in 2018 is similarly tainted but I have not run the numbers on it yet. I don't think I really need to do so.
The truth will come out. Another large and unnecessary concession that will cost us 1% of our W-2.
#7063
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
DALPA process has been and is being followed.
Ask your REP if it is being followed.
Educate yourself and ask questions if a TA is handed off.
Argue in facts and perhaps your opinion will be held up as valid.
#7064
PS will go to 10% of 6 billion (600 million) our share is approximately 33% of that figure so 200 million. Then the 20%... (Oh and BTW did you see the little nugget in there how they would change how PTIX would be calculated). There will be little chance to make over 6 billion and get into that extra 10% bucket.
Currently, we have a extra 3.5 billion in at the 20% bucket. In my scenario, this year we make 6 billion in profit. PS would be 10% up to 2.5 billion or 250 million.... Then 3.5 billion at 20% or 700 million more for a total of 950 million. We get a third, so let's call it 317 million to the pilots.
Now with the new TA, we get 600 million as a employee group, pilots share is 200 million. That is a loss of 117 million each year for EVER. This TA is funded by PS give backs from the employee group. Our Union used to say we can't ask for that because the other employees will want that too. Now we apparently don't give a crap and will take away large sums of their PS and 117 million of our PS to fund this. Heck, we can't even get the training pay that FA's get around hear. This TA has more skeletons that a graveyard.
#7065
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 0
#7066
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 0
How do you figure?
PS will go to 10% of 6 billion (600 million) our share is approximately 33% of that figure so 200 million. Then the 20%... (Oh and BTW did you see the little nugget in there how they would change how PTIX would be calculated). There will be little chance to make over 6 billion and get into that extra 10% bucket.
Currently, we have a extra 3.5 billion in at the 20% bucket. In my scenario, this year we make 6 billion in profit. PS would be 10% up to 2.5 billion or 250 million.... Then 3.5 billion at 20% or 700 million more for a total of 950 million. We get a third, so let's call it 317 million to the pilots.
Now with the new TA, we get 600 million as a employee group, pilots share is 200 million. That is a loss of 117 million each year for EVER. This TA is funded by PS give backs from the employee group. Our Union used to say we can't ask for that because the other employees will want that too. Now we apparently don't give a crap and will take away large sums of their PS and 117 million of our PS to fund this. Heck, we can't even get the training pay that FA's get around hear. This TA has more skeletons that a graveyard.
PS will go to 10% of 6 billion (600 million) our share is approximately 33% of that figure so 200 million. Then the 20%... (Oh and BTW did you see the little nugget in there how they would change how PTIX would be calculated). There will be little chance to make over 6 billion and get into that extra 10% bucket.
Currently, we have a extra 3.5 billion in at the 20% bucket. In my scenario, this year we make 6 billion in profit. PS would be 10% up to 2.5 billion or 250 million.... Then 3.5 billion at 20% or 700 million more for a total of 950 million. We get a third, so let's call it 317 million to the pilots.
Now with the new TA, we get 600 million as a employee group, pilots share is 200 million. That is a loss of 117 million each year for EVER. This TA is funded by PS give backs from the employee group. Our Union used to say we can't ask for that because the other employees will want that too. Now we apparently don't give a crap and will take away large sums of their PS and 117 million of our PS to fund this. Heck, we can't even get the training pay that FA's get around hear. This TA has more skeletons that a graveyard.
#7067
You will notice the DALPA sales team have colluded on some talking points early on (with many more to come I am sure). Taken from the public MEC webpage...
"Don't jump to conclusions. My personal opinion--as this is the final, max from the company, this should go to all pilots for our vote! It's OUR union, we should get our say!"
- Jan Donatelli
I think we need to look at the full language and have our say. I hated C12 at first and now looking back I realize how profitable it's been for the Delta Pilots.
- Brian Shinnick
It's easy to pick one or two issues that are "no" worthy, but there has to be a path forward and not just no. If the mec votes not to pass the ta forward then you abrogate your ability to have a democratic say into the outcome that affects 12,700 or so pilots. You concede to 10 mec members the inability to memrat, which, by the way, naysayers including dpa supporters, that memrat is paramount to ANY deal. So, in this case you don't, all others you do.
- John White
So it's only democratic if it goes to memrat. It's clear the majority want this sent back. As with the survey, the desires of the pilots are falling on deaf ears....again.
Another bogus play is stating pay rates combining hourly pay, profit sharing and DC against other airlines hourly pay but leaving out the fact AA or Fedex have a pension (for example) and what those numbers (combing the value of 60% FAE with hourly) would be worth. This is the kind of manipulative BS that makes the union lose credibility. They twist the info to sell. It's dishonest and a dirtbag way to operate. Do none of these guys feel any shame?
Here's an exchange between one of the company/union yesman and a line pilot who exposes some flawed logic.
Line Pilot: "My seat (88 Capt) still won't exceed the pay rate I had on the same seat in 2004 until 2017. No amount of evaluation of the language can change that simple fact. My NO vote is already planned. Send this back and get something real."
DALPA sales guy: $317 an hour in 2016 if you include profit sharing and DC contributions
Line Pilot: The hourly pay for 88 Capt in 2004 was $237. In 2016 it will be $236.62. It will not exceed that rate til 2017. PS is not guaranteed & DC is not current income. Let's compare apples to apples. Also in 2004 I was promised 60% FAE, a darn sight more than any DC or PS promise.
Does this manipulative sale job make anybody angry? It should. Eject the guys pulling this nonsense from ever doing union work regardless of what union survives.
"Don't jump to conclusions. My personal opinion--as this is the final, max from the company, this should go to all pilots for our vote! It's OUR union, we should get our say!"
- Jan Donatelli
I think we need to look at the full language and have our say. I hated C12 at first and now looking back I realize how profitable it's been for the Delta Pilots.
- Brian Shinnick
It's easy to pick one or two issues that are "no" worthy, but there has to be a path forward and not just no. If the mec votes not to pass the ta forward then you abrogate your ability to have a democratic say into the outcome that affects 12,700 or so pilots. You concede to 10 mec members the inability to memrat, which, by the way, naysayers including dpa supporters, that memrat is paramount to ANY deal. So, in this case you don't, all others you do.
- John White
So it's only democratic if it goes to memrat. It's clear the majority want this sent back. As with the survey, the desires of the pilots are falling on deaf ears....again.
Another bogus play is stating pay rates combining hourly pay, profit sharing and DC against other airlines hourly pay but leaving out the fact AA or Fedex have a pension (for example) and what those numbers (combing the value of 60% FAE with hourly) would be worth. This is the kind of manipulative BS that makes the union lose credibility. They twist the info to sell. It's dishonest and a dirtbag way to operate. Do none of these guys feel any shame?
Here's an exchange between one of the company/union yesman and a line pilot who exposes some flawed logic.
Line Pilot: "My seat (88 Capt) still won't exceed the pay rate I had on the same seat in 2004 until 2017. No amount of evaluation of the language can change that simple fact. My NO vote is already planned. Send this back and get something real."
DALPA sales guy: $317 an hour in 2016 if you include profit sharing and DC contributions
Line Pilot: The hourly pay for 88 Capt in 2004 was $237. In 2016 it will be $236.62. It will not exceed that rate til 2017. PS is not guaranteed & DC is not current income. Let's compare apples to apples. Also in 2004 I was promised 60% FAE, a darn sight more than any DC or PS promise.
Does this manipulative sale job make anybody angry? It should. Eject the guys pulling this nonsense from ever doing union work regardless of what union survives.
Their slogan...we can't possibly do worse.
#7070
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post


Apparently I downloaded it to my computer and I still have it. If I can find it I will post the link.

