Details on Delta TA
#761
For us north pukes, what was 3 B.6? And exactly how did you use the leverage so provided?
Exactly how did UAL pilots use their leverage?
When you say you "went after" UAL + 1%, what does that mean? What was the process by which you "went after" something?
Carl
Carl
#762
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
4. We had used the leverage provided by 3 B. 6. and the new 777's to set the "Delta Dot," a huge pay rate for the 777. UAL pilots then leveraged that to arrive at a new contract that was higher than the bar set by the new 777 rate. We then went after UAL +1%, achieving that with an average 16% increase on Day One.

The C2K MEC talked about Restoration, and they went after it.
Why won't this MEC even mention the word?
#763
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
If at the end of that time, no pay rate had been established, the aircraft would be parked until a pay rate could be agreed upon.
Our CEO at that time was Leo Mullin, from McKinsey Associates, king of all out sourcing. Leo said he would sell them (we only had two on property, but many more coming) and cancel the orders for more. Our then MEC called his bluff and we settled for a higher pay rate. ($265 in 1998 I believe).
The answer to both of your follow on questions is the same, "Labor Risk".
Too bad it's off the table now!
Oh, and we gave 3.B.6 away in a subsequent contract...sigh. We could have used it to get much higher pay rates on the 717's.
#764
Banned
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Do you think we can replicate that strategy to get UAL +1% again? When do you think the NMB will release us into a 30 day countdown to a strike?
#765
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
We pattern bargained off of UAL. Got UAL +1% when the NMB released us into a thirty day cooling off period. I think we were about two weeks from an authorized strike.
Do you think we can replicate that strategy to get UAL +1% again? When do you think the NMB will release us into a 30 day countdown to a strike?
Do you think we can replicate that strategy to get UAL +1% again? When do you think the NMB will release us into a 30 day countdown to a strike?

But this time around, I would not even mention pattern bargaining to the NMB. Instead, I would talk about the financial INVESTMENT the PILOTS made to SAVE DELTA, and how they are now ready to be REPAID! The very minute the NMB said the word "Parked" I would call a strike, immediately.
No cooling off, no BS.
I'd get some FUPM bag stickers to set the tone first, of course!
#766
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
3.B.6 was a clause in our contract that basically said, on any 'new' equipment, for which no pay rates existed, the pilots would fly it for 6mo (or was it 9 mo?) while they negotiated a pay rate for it.
If at the end of that time, no pay rate had been established, the aircraft would be parked until a pay rate could be agreed upon.
Our CEO at that time was Leo Mullin, from McKinsey Associates, king of all out sourcing. Leo said he would sell them (we only had two on property, but many more coming) and cancel the orders for more. Our then MEC called his bluff and we settled for a higher pay rate. ($265 in 1998 I believe).
If at the end of that time, no pay rate had been established, the aircraft would be parked until a pay rate could be agreed upon.
Our CEO at that time was Leo Mullin, from McKinsey Associates, king of all out sourcing. Leo said he would sell them (we only had two on property, but many more coming) and cancel the orders for more. Our then MEC called his bluff and we settled for a higher pay rate. ($265 in 1998 I believe).

UAL used the "Delta Dot" to adjust their bargaining position and achieve their best paying contract. We then topped them with C2K. We kept the pay for 42 months of the 48 month agreement, then came LOA-46.
#767
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
If, we grant any relief it must be of limited duration.
I.e. if we flex more hours it would be for 4 months a year for 2 years.
Jerry
#768
Banned
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Section 3.b.6
If aircraft other than the equipment listed above are placed in revenue operations, prior thereto conferences shall be initiated by either the Company or the Association under the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, irrespective of Section 28 (Duration) of this Agreement, for the purpose of establishing rates of pay, rules and working conditions applicable to such new equipment. Such rates of pay, rules and working conditions shall be effective as of the date the equipment is placed in scheduled or non‑scheduled operation by the Company. Pilots shall fly such new aircraft in the Company's scheduled and non‑scheduled operation at such time as such aircraft are declared airworthy by the Federal Aviation Administration whether or not rates of pay, rules and working conditions for such equipment have been agreed upon; provided, however, that this obligation shall not continue if such rates of pay, rules and working conditions have not been agreed upon for a period of six (6) months after such new aircraft has been placed in operation by the Company.
#769
Banned
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
How much do you think this productivity concession you propose is worth, particularly if its only for 4 months? Do you think that RA will write a billion dollars worth of improvements in our contract for this concession?
#770
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
3.B.6 was a clause in our contract that basically said, on any 'new' equipment, for which no pay rates existed, the pilots would fly it for 6mo (or was it 9 mo?) while they negotiated a pay rate for it.
If at the end of that time, no pay rate had been established, the aircraft would be parked until a pay rate could be agreed upon.
Our CEO at that time was Leo Mullin, from McKinsey Associates, king of all out sourcing. Leo said he would sell them (we only had two on property, but many more coming) and cancel the orders for more. Our then MEC called his bluff and we settled for a higher pay rate. ($265 in 1998 I believe).
The answer to both of your follow on questions is the same, "Labor Risk".
Too bad it's off the table now!
Oh, and we gave 3.B.6 away in a subsequent contract...sigh. We could have used it to get much higher pay rates on the 717's.
If at the end of that time, no pay rate had been established, the aircraft would be parked until a pay rate could be agreed upon.
Our CEO at that time was Leo Mullin, from McKinsey Associates, king of all out sourcing. Leo said he would sell them (we only had two on property, but many more coming) and cancel the orders for more. Our then MEC called his bluff and we settled for a higher pay rate. ($265 in 1998 I believe).
The answer to both of your follow on questions is the same, "Labor Risk".
Too bad it's off the table now!
Oh, and we gave 3.B.6 away in a subsequent contract...sigh. We could have used it to get much higher pay rates on the 717's.
We originally opened for something way beyond 265 dollars an hour. The negotiating committee did not even like the opener and after the fact stated several times we could have had a agreement early on at a higher rate had we not opened around 400 an hour. We had 15 on order and with the disagreement the last 7 orders were cancelled.
3b6 was a one shot deal and we blew are wad. The company vowed not to take delivery of any airframe again without a agreement on rates. That basically nullified 3b6.
As far as Carl's question on UAL the Delta rates established on the 73n, 767-400 and 777 were well above anything else in the US industry. It forced the CEO of united to raise his offer substantially and UAL settled for what were essentially the 3b6 rates. The UAL referred to it as the Delta dot and said it tied his hands.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



