Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-2015, 05:10 PM
  #8851  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley
Can you be 116th and Malcolm x Blvd at 2am? It's in Harlem.
Dang it Hank. Water right through the nose.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-14-2015, 05:17 PM
  #8852  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Later, SharpestTool. The banhammer hath fallen.

80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 06-14-2015, 05:21 PM
  #8853  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Moondog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 558
Default

WooooooHooooooo! Thanks 80kts!!
Moondog is offline  
Old 06-14-2015, 05:33 PM
  #8854  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
There are abusers and we all damn well know it.
Sick leave abuse is one of the most serious offenses you can have in your employment here. Its a legal issue. There are rules of evidence and procedure. Proven guilt is almost always a firing offense even for a first occasion. Pilots are NOT being terminated for it. You saying that there is abuse is your personal and anecdotal opinions. Nothing more.

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
One reason they don't get fired is that DALPA defends them mightily, the same way a defense attorney does his best even if he "knows" his client did it.
DALPA can't fix sick leave abusers. If it's proven, you're done. DALPA can't help you.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-14-2015, 05:34 PM
  #8855  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Some other perspectives:

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
I know this is a FedEx board, but you could include UPS in the title also.

Delta will have two contracts in the time both our groups have been negotiating.
Originally Posted by Full pull
Delta has a T/A 7 months before amendable date and how many years past the amendable date are we? Makes me want to go the extra mile for the company. Stop $&@king with us and give us the contract we deserve!
Originally Posted by jsled
Having read the Delta TA highlights, I see no reason to vote no. New hire seat locks? 50/50 block hours ratio on code shares (current UAL contract), shrinking DCI overall but adding 25-70/76 seaters for 50 mainline 90/95 seaters? No deal killers there. I don't really understand the SL changes from reading the TA changes (but it says it won't affect 2/3 of the pilot group) and the profit sharing change is questionable....but the pay rates and the fact that it's early? Slam dunk in my opinion. The good times won't last forever. I'd lock it in. Good luck!

Sled

slowplay is offline  
Old 06-14-2015, 05:35 PM
  #8856  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Later, SharpestTool. The banhammer hath fallen.

Now THAT'S funny. Using his own avatar as the ban hammer logo.

Tip of the hat to you Clamp!

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-14-2015, 05:38 PM
  #8857  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

.............
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-14-2015, 05:39 PM
  #8858  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flamer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Lowest Pay I Could Find
Posts: 1,044
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Some other perspectives:








I could read the ALPA talking points for a TA in the airline lav cleaning industry and assume it was a slam dunk too. But thanks for the input from the no SA guys at the other airline.
Flamer is offline  
Old 06-14-2015, 05:52 PM
  #8859  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by orvil
You know, Buzz isn't wrong about everything. The money is attractive. He glosses over the areas where our quality of life and personal information are trashed.
To me, the money isn't attractive at all given that we're funding part of the pay with profit sharing cuts.

He also glosses over top and bottom end scope job losses, a new B scale with the E190, and a huge loss to FO's with the removal of LCA trips. Other than that, Hazzard got it right.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-14-2015, 06:02 PM
  #8860  
Gets Weekends Off
 
satchip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Flying the SEC
Posts: 2,350
Default

Let's face it guys, the money is good. To us that weren't' here for C2K it's astounding. If that's all I cared about I'd be voting yes.

But when you peel back the onion you begin to cry. The money isn't growth money, it's replacement money. Every penny of increase in these pay rates comes from somewhere else in the contract. Profit sharing, scope losses, and productivity gains for the company plus the other employee groups profit sharing finances every last penny. In other words, every penny raise is taken directly from the back pocket of someone else. Is that what we are about?
satchip is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices